Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity - A scanning electron microscopic study

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 8-17

  Federlin, Marianne ^a   Sipos, C ^b   Hiller, K A ^a   Thonemann, B ^a   Schmalz, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Feldspathic porcelain; Luting agents; Margin analysis; Partial ceramic crowns; Preparation design

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROCESS DESIGN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CERAMICS; CROWNS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;

EID: 15844387100     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-004-0276-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Besek MJ, Mörmann WH, Lutz F (1996) Curing of composites under CEREC inlays. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 347-360
2. Bindl A, Mörmann WH 2003 Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 111:163-169 12648269
3. Broderson S (1994) Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 25:535-539 1:STN:280:BymD3cvpvVM%3D
4. Burke FJT (1996) Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: The effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 27:115-121 1:STN:280:ByiB3MjitVU%3D
5. Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller K-A, Thonemann B, Schmalz G (2004) Partial ceramic crowns: Influence of preparation design and luting material on marginal integrity in vitro: A microleakage study. Oper Dent (accepted for publication)
6. Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1995) The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 11:186-190 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80016-6
7. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA (1998) Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 2:161-167 10.1007/s007840050064
8. Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (2000) Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: Results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 4:199-205 10.1007/s007840000082
9. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 25:459-465 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3gt1Cjsw%3D%3D
10. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B (1997) Clinical and quantitative margin analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:163-168 10.1007/s007840050028
11. Haller B, Thull R, Klaiber B, Schmitz A (1990) Reinforcement of cusps with adhesively luted inlays in MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 45: 660-664
12. Hürzeler M, Zimmermann E, Mörmann WH (1990) Marginal adaptation of machined ceramic onlays in vitro [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:715-720 2198654
13. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N (1996) Procedures for multi-cusp restorations. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 143-152
14. Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445-1449 1:STN:280:By6C3MjpslM%3D
15. Kunzelmann KH (1999) Ceramic restorations - state of the art of ceramic inserts, ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns [German]. Bayerisches Zahnärzteblatt 3:17-22
16. Lang H, Schüler N, Nolden R (1998) Ceramic inlay or partial ceramic crown? [German.] Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:53-56
17. Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R (1994) Deflection of restored teeth [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 49:812-816
18. Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 80:699-707 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FkslOisQ%3D%3D
19. Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (1996) Marginal integrity of composite and ceramic inlays in large MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 51:701-704
20. Mehl A, Pfeiffer A, Kremers L, Hickel R (1998) Marginal integrity of Cerec II inlays in extensive MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:57-60
21. Pröbster L (2001) Are all ceramic crowns and bridges scientifically accepted? [German.]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:575-576
22. Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Computerized Dent 3:9-23 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3lsVSntQ%3D%3D
23. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ (1998) Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:280-301 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmt1Oitr4%3D
24. Roulet JF, Janda R (2001) Future ceramic systems. Oper Dent Suppl 6:211-228
25. Roulet JF (1997) Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:40-46 10.1007/s007840050007
26. Schmalz G, Guertsen W (2001) Ceramic inlays and veneers. Scientific statement of the German Dental Association [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:347-348
27. Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF (1995) Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 74:145-150 1:STN:280:BymC38bnsVQ%3D
28. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV (1998) A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 56:263-267 10.1080/000163598428428
29. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard E (1996) Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 76:472-476 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90003-7
30. Staehle HJ (1999) Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhesive Dent 1:267-284
31. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr, Thompson JY (2003) Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 89:551-557 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00173-2
32. Tidehag P, Gunne J (1995) A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 8: 456-460 1:STN:280:BymC2sjgslI%3D
33. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 11:161-168 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80012-3
34. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1997) SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in class II composite restorations. Dent Mater 13:192-197 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjtFWgug%3D%3D
35. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Schams A (1997) Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1:27-34 10.1007/s007840050005
36. van Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (2001) Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 109:222-229 10.1034/ j.1600-0722.2001.00063.x
37. van Dijken JWV, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (1999) Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent 82:529-535 10559724
38. Wagner J, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G (2003) Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs. ceramic partial crowns. Clin Oral Invest 7:80-85 10.1007/s00784-003-0205-8