Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 222-229

  Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a,d   Hasselrot, Lars ^b   Örmin, Annika ^c   Olofsson, Anna Lena ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Public Dental Health Center Korpen   (Sweden)

^c Public Dental Health Center Holmsund   (Sweden)

^d UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cement; Ceramic; Clinical; Composite; Resin

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND SYSTEM; ALL-BOND SYSTEM; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISFIL; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA; GLUTARALDEHYDE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; VARIOLINK;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALUMINUM SILICATES; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLUTARAL; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0035430776     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00063.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. DIJKEN VAN JWV. All-ceramic restoratives: classification and clinical evaluations. Comp Contin Dent Educ 1999; 20: 1115-1134.
2. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Multiple versus one-bottle bonding systems. Réalités Cliniques 1999; 10: 199-222.
3. BURKE FJT, QUALTHROUGH AJE, WILSON NHF. A retrospective evaluation of a series of dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 103-106.
4. BURKE FJT. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 293-300.
5. BURKE FJT. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: the effect if increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 115-121.
6. DIJKEN VAN JWV, HASSELROT L, ÖRMIN A, OLOFSSON A-L. Clinical evaluation of extensive dentin/enamel-bonded all-ceramic onlays and onlay-crowns. J Dent Res 1999; 79: 445.
7. BURKE FJT, WATTS DC. Effect of differing luting systems on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 21-27.
8. MCCORMICK JT, ROWLAND W, SHILLINGBURG HT, DUNCANSSON MG. Effect of luting media on the compressive strength of two types of all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 405-408.
9. DIJKEN VAN JWV, HÖGLUND-ÅBERG C, OLOFSSON AL. Fired ceramic inlays. A six year follow up. J Dent 1998; 26: 219-225.
10. PALLESEN U, DIJKEN Van JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 239-246.
11. BREEDING LC, NIXON DL, CAUGHMAN WF. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosth Dent 1991; 65: 512-518.
12. HASEGAWA EA, BOYER DB, CHAN DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosth Dent 1991; 66: 187-192.
13. RUEGGEBERG FA, CAUGHMAN WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 48-55.
14. SJÖGREN G, MOLIN M, DIJKEN van JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or a chemically cured luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 263-267.
15. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Clinical evaluation of three different adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 285-291.
16. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
17. BORGMEIJER PJ, KREULEN CM, AMERONGEN WE, AKERBOOM HBM, GRUYTHUYSEN RMJ. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with class II composite resin restorations. J Dent Child 1991; 58: 378-383.
18. SIEGEL S. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956; 166-172.
19. DIJKEN VAN JWV, KIERI C, CARLÉN M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin-modified GIC-composite. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1319-1325.
20. DAVIDSSON CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esth Dent 1994; 6: 223-226.
21. DAVIDSSON CL, FEILZER AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25: 435-440.
22. LIEBENBERG WH. Use of resin-bonded partial coverage ceramic restorations to treat incomplete fractures in posterior teeth: A clinical report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 739-747.
23. DONG JK, LUTHY H, WOHLWEND A, SCHÄRER P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 9-16.
24. DIJKEN VAN JWV, ORMIN A, OLOFSSON AL. Pressed ceramic inlays (IPS Empress) luted with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a chemical-cured resin composite. J Prosth Dent 1999; 82: 529-535.
25. TIDEHAG P, GUNNE J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 456-460.
26. MAK M, QUALTHROUGH AJE, BURKE FJT. The effect of different ceramic materials on the fracture resistance of dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 197-203.
27. PATEL SN, SAUNDERS WP, BURKE FJT. Microleakage of dentin-bonded crowns placed with different luting materials. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 179-183.
28. LEHNER C, STUDER S, BRODBECK U, SCHÄRER P. Short-term result of IPS-Empress full-porcelain crowns. J Prosthodontics 1997; 6: 20-30.
29. STUDER S, LEHNER C, BRODBECK U, SCHÄRER P. Six-year results of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998; 3: 218-225.
30. SJÖGREN G, LANTTO R, GRANBERG Å, SUNDSTRÖM B-O, TILLBERG A. Clinical examination of leucite reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 122-128.
31. KRÄMER N, FRANKENBERGER R, PELKA M, PETSCHFELT A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999; 27: 325-331.
32. DIJKEN VAN JWV. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. Swed Dent J 1991; 15: 259-264.
33. TOUATI B, MIARI P, NATHANSON D. Esthetic dentistry and ceramic restorations. London: Martin Dunitz, 1999.
34. BURKE FJT, WATTS DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 335-340.
35. HOPKINS K. An investigation into the role of porcelain thickness in determing the load-carrying capacity of porcelain laminates. Br Dent J 1989; 167: 201-204.
36. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in class V abrasion lesions. A four-year follow-up. Dental Mat 1994; 10: 319-324.
37. HEYMANN HO, STURDEVANT JR, BRUNSON WD, WILDER AD, SLUDER TB, BAYNE SC. Twelve-month clinical study of dentin adhesives in class V cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 116: 179-183.
38. VAN MEERBEEK B, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent 1994; 22: 141-146.
39. PRATI C, CHERSONI S, MONGIORGI G, PASHLEY DH. Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentin layer in young, old, and sclerotic dentin. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 66-72.
40. DUKE ES, ROBBINS JW, SNYDER DE. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 889-895.