In Vitro Fracture Force and Marginal Adaptation of Ceramic Crowns Fixed on Natural and Artificial Teeth

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 387-391

  Rosentritt, Martin ^a,b   Plein, Tobias ^a   Kolbeck, Carola ^a   Behr, Michael ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; LIQUID CRYSTAL POLYMER; POLYMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POLYMERS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 0034280714     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson L, Wozniak W. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-482.
2. Krejci I, Albert R, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78:713-719.
3. Kappert HF, Knode H, Schultheiss R. Strength of the In-Ceram system under mechanical loads and thermocycling in artificial saliva. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:129-131.
4. Scherrer S, De Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-467.
5. Füllemann J, Krejci I, Lutz F. Composite inlays: Clinical and scanning electron microscopic research after a 1-year functional period. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1992;102:292-298.
6. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-399.
7. Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Scharnagl P, Behr M, Handel C. Regensburger masticator. Materials Testing 1997;39:77-80.
8. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1445-1449.
9. Behr M, Hindelang U, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of failure rates of adhesive-fixed partial dentures in in-vivo and in-vitro studies. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:25-30.
10. Brosius G, Brosius F. SPSS Base System and Professional Statistics. Bonn: Inter Thomson, 1995.
11. Ludwig K. Untersuchungen zur Bruchfestigkeit von IPS-Empress-Kronen in Abhängigkeit von den Zementiermodalitäten. Quintessenz Zahntech 1994;20:247-256.
12. Yoshinari M, Dérand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:329-338.
13. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded-to-tooth ceramic restorations: In vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;3:299-305.
14. Plein T, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. LCP - A suitable substitute for human/bovine dentin in in-vitro tests [abstr 348]? J Dent Res 1999;78:149.
15. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Tensile stress in glass-ceramic crowns: Effects of flaws and cement voids. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:351-358.
16. Meier M, Fischer H, Richter EJ, Maier HR, Spiekermann H. Effects of different preparation designs on the fracture strength of all-ceramic molar crowns. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995;50:295-299.
17. Hofmann E, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of technical failure rate of single crowns and 3-4 FPD [abstr 284]. J Dent Res 1999;78:118.