The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required to preserve genome integrity upon DNA damage in S-phase

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 34, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 5880-5891

  Laha, Suparna S ^a   Das, Shankar Prasad ^a   Hajra, Sujata ^a   Sau, Soumitra ^a   Sinha, Pratima ^a  

^a BOSE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; PROTEIN CHL1P; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SYNTHESIS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WILD TYPE;

ALKYLATING AGENTS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MUTATION; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 33845628084     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl749     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Melo,J. and Toczyski,D. (2002) A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 14, 237-245.
2. Nyberg,K.A., Michelson,R.J., Putnam,C.W. and Weinert,T.A. (2002) Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet., 36, 617-656.
3. Osborn,A.J., Elledge,S.J. and Zou,L. (2002) Checking on the fork: The DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol., 12, 509-516.
4. Friedberg,E.C. (2003) DNA damage and repair. Nature, 421, 436-440.
5. Friedberg,E.C., McDaniel,L.D. and Schultz,R.A. (2004) The role of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage and mutagenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 14, 5-10.
6. Cobb,J.A., Shimada,K. and Gasser,S.M. (2004) Redundancy, insult-specific sensors and thresholds: Unlocking the S-phase checkpoint response. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 14, 292-300.
7. Emili,A. (1998) MECl-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell, 2, 183-189.
8. Vialard,J.E., Gilbert,C.S., Green,C.M. and Lowndes,N.F. (1998) The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/ Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J., 17, 5679-5688.
9. Schwartz,M.F., Duong,J.K., Sun,Z., Morrow,J.S., Pradhan,D. and Stern,D.F. (2002) Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell, 9, 1055-1065.
10. Kiser,G.L. and Weinert,T.A. (1996) Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol. Biol. Cell, 7, 703-718.
11. Aboussekhra,A., Vialard,J.E., Morrison,D.E., de la Torre-Ruiz,M.A., Cernakova,L., Fabre,F. and Lowndes,N.F. (1996) A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J., 15, 3912-3922.
12. Navas,T.A., Sanchez,Y. and Elledge,S.J. (1996) RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev., 10, 2632-2643.
13. Santocanale,C. and Diffley,J.F.X. (1998) A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature, 395, 615-618.
14. Shirahige,K., Hori,Y., Shiraishi,K., Yamashita,M., Takahashi,K., Obuse,C., Tsurimoto,T. and Yoshikawa,H. (1998) Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature, 395, 618-621.
15. Lowndes,N.F. and Murguia,J.R. (2000) Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 10, 17-25.
16. Tercero,J.A. and Diffley,J.F. (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mecl/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature, 412, 553-557.
17. Lopes,M., Cotta-Ramusino,C., Pellicioli,A., Liberi,G., Plevani,P., Muzi-Falconi,M., Newlon,C.S. and Foiani,M. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature, 412, 557-561.
18. Sogo,J.M., Lopes,M. and Foiani,M. (2002) Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science, 297, 599-602.
19. Clarke,D.J., Segal,M., Andrews,C.A., Rudyak,S.G., Jensen,S., Smith,K. and Reed,S.I. (2003) S-phase checkpoint controls mitosis via an APC-independent Cdc20p function. Nat. Cell. Biol., 5, 928-935.
20. Krishnan,V., Nirantar,S., Crasta,K., Cheng,A.Y. and Surana,U. (2004) DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behaviour. Mol. Cell, 16, 687-700.
21. Paulovich,A.G., Margulies,R.U., Garvik,B.M. and Hartwell,L.H. (1997) Rad9, Rad17 and Rad24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics, 145, 45-62.
22. 1 phase is recombinogenic in DNA polymerase β defective mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 280-288.
23. Tercero,J.A., Longhese,M.P. and Diffley,J.F.X. (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell, 11, 1323-1336.
24. Maine,G.T., Sinha,P. and Tye,B.-K. (1984) Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosome. Genetics, 106, 365-385.
25. Tye,B.-K. (1999) MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 68, 649-686.
26. Bell,S.P. and Dutta,A. (2002) DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 71, 333-374.
27. Forsburg,S.L. (2004) Eukaryotic MCM proteins: Beyond replication initiation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 68, 109-131.
28. Haber,J.E. (1974) Bisexual mating behavior in a diploid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evidence for genetically controlled non-random chromosome loss during vegetative growth. Genetics, 78, 843-858.
29. 2/M. EMBO J., 9, 4347-4358.
30. Skibbens,R.V. (2004) Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion. Genetics, 166, 33-42.
31. Mayer,M.L., Pot,I., Chang,M., Xu,H., Aneliunas,V., Kwok,T., Newitt,R., Aebersold,R., Boone,C., Brown,G.W. and Hieter,P. (2004) Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 1736-1745.
32. Dcc1/Ctf8, the helicase Chl1 and the polymerase-α-associated protein Ctf4 is essential for chromatid disjunction during meiosis II. J. Cell Sci., 117, 3547-3559.
33. Weiler,K.S., Szeto,L. and Broach,J.R. (1995) Mutations affecting donor preference during mating type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 139, 1495-1510.
34. Das,S.P. and Sinha,P. (2005) The budding yeast protein Chl1p has a role in transcriptional silencing, rDNA recombination and aging. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 337, 167-172.
35. Holloway,S.L. (2000) CHL1 is a nuclear protein with an essential ATP binding site that exhibits a size-dependent effect on chromosome segregation. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 3056-3064.
36. Amann,J., Kidd,V.J. and Lahti,J.M. (1997) Characterization of putative human homologues of the yeast chromosome transmission fidelity gene, CHL1. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 3823-3832.
37. Hirota,Y. and Lahti,J.M. (2000) Characterization of the enzymatic activity of hChlR1, a novel human DNA helicase. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 917-924.
38. Cantor,S.B., Bell,D.W., Ganesan,S., Kass,E.M., Drapkin,R., Grossman,S., Wahrer,D.C.R., Sgroi,D.C., Lane,W.S., Haber,D.A. and Livingston,D.M. (2001) BACH1, a novel helicase-like protein, interacts directly with BRCA1 and contributes to its DNA repair function. Cell, 105, 149-160.
39. Maiti,A.K. and Sinha,P. (1992) The mcm2 mutation of yeast affects replication, rather than segregation or amplification of the two micron plasmid. J. Mol. Biol., 224, 545-558.
40. Kilmartin,J.V., Wright,B. and Milstein,C. (1982) Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J. Cell Biol., 93, 576-582.
41. Gietz,R.D. and Sugino,A. (1988) New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene, 74, 527-534.
42. Fitch,M.J., Donato,J.J. and Tye,B.-K. (2003) Mcm7, a subunit of the presumptive MCM helicase, modulates its own expression in conjunction with Mcm1. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 25408-25416.
43. Breeden,L.L. (1997) Alpha-factor synchronization of budding yeast. Methods Enzymol., 283, 332-341.
44. Poddar,A., Roy,N. and Sinha,P. (1999) MCM21 and MCM22, two novel genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for chromosome transmission. Mol. Microbiol., 31, 349-360.
45. Ghosh,S.K., Sau,S., Lahiri,S., Lohia,A. and Sinha,P. (2004) The Im13 protein of the budding yeast is required for the prevention of precocious sister chromatid separation in meiosis I and for sister chromatid disjunction in meiosis II. Curr. Genet., 46, 82-91.
46. Ray,A. and Sinha,P. (1995) The mcm2-1 mutation of yeast causes DNA damage with a RAD9 requirement for repair. Curr. Genet., 27, 95-101.
47. Roy,N., Poddar,A., Lohia,A. and Sinha,P. (1997) The mcm17 mutation of yeast shows a size-dependent segregational defect of a mini-chromosome. Curr. Genet., 32, 182-189.
48. Cheeseman,I.M., Drubin,D.G. and Barnes,G. (2002) Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: Linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol., 157, 199-203.
49. Sinha,P., Chang,V. and Tye,B.-K. (1986) A mutant that affects the function of autonomously replicating sequences in yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 192, 805-814.
50. Yan,H., Merchant,A.M. and Tye,B.-K. (1993) Cell cycle-regulated nuclear localization of MCM2 and MCM3, which are required for the initiation of DNA synthesis at chromosomal replication origins in yeast. Genes Dev., 7, 2149-2160.
51. Hajra,S. (2003) Kinetochore structure of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A study using genetic and protein-protein interactions. PhD Thesis, Jadavpur University, Kolkata.
52. Hartwell,L.H. and Smith,D. (1985) Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics, 110, 381-395.
53. Chang,M., Bellaoui,M., Boone,C. and Brown,G.W. (2002) A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 16934-16939.
54. Pan,X., Ye,P., Yuan,D.S., Wang,X., Bader,J.S. and Boeke,J.D. (2006) A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell, 124, 1069-1081.
55. Desany,B.A., Alcasabas,A.A., Bachant,J.B. and Elledge,S.J. (1998) Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes. Dev., 12, 2956-2970.
56. Watt,P.M., Hickson,I.D., Borts,R.H. and Louis,E.J. (1996) SGS1, a homologue of the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 144, 935-945.
57. Myung,K., Datta,A., Chen,C. and Kolodner,R.D. (2001) SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homologous recombination. Nature Genet., 27, 113-116.
58. Frei,C. and Gasser,S.M. (2000) The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev., 14, 81-96.
59. Memisoglu,A. and Samson,L. (2000) Base excision repair in yeast and mammals. Mutat. Res., 451, 39-51.
60. Pal,A. (1992) Characterization of a mutant that effects the function of autonomously replicating sequences in yeast. PhD Thesis, Jadavpur University, Kolkata.
61. Fox,C.A., Loo,S., Dillin,A. and Rine,J. (1995) The origin recognition complex has essential functions in transcriptional silencing and chromosomal replication. Genes Dev., 9, 911-924.
62. Liang,C., Weinreich,M. and Stillman,B. (1995) ORC and Cdc6p interact and determine the frequency of initiation of DNA replication in the genome. Cell, 81, 667-676.
63. Liang,C. and Stillman,B. (1997) Persistent initiation of DNA replication and chromatin-bound MCM proteins during the cell cycle in cdc6 mutants. Genes Dev., 11, 3375-3386.
64. Green,B.M. and Li,J.J. (2005) Loss of rereplication control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in extensive DNA damage. Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 421-432.
65. Watanabe,K., Morishita,J., Umezu,K., Shirahige,K. and Maki,H. (2002) Involvement of Rad9-dependent damage checkpoint control in arrest of cell cycle, induction of cell death, and chromosome instability caused by defects in origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryotic Cell, 1, 200-212.
66. Weinberger,M., Ramachandran,L., Feng,L., Sharma,K., Sun,X., Marchetti,M., Huberman,J.A. and Burhans,W.C. (2005) Apoptosis in budding yeast caused by defects in initiation of DNA replication. J. Cell Sci., 118, 3543-3553.
67. Dillin,A. and Rine,J. (1998) Roles for ORC in M phase and S phase. Science, 279, 1733-1737.
68. Gibson,D.G., Bell,S.P. and Aparicio,O.M. (2006) Cell cycle execution point analysis of ORC function and characterization of the checkpoint response to ORC inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells, 11, 557-573.
69. Warren,C.D., Eckley,D.M., Lee,M.S., Hanna,J.S., Hughes,A., Peyser,B., Jie,C., Irizarry,R. and Spencer,F.A. (2004) S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 1724-1735.
70. Kenna,M.A. and Skibbens,R.V. (2003) Mechanical link between cohesion establishment and DNA replication: Ctf7p/Eco1p, a cohesion establishment factor, associates with three different replication factor C complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 2999-3007.
71. Suter,B., Tong,A., Chang,M., Yu,L., Brown,G.W., Boone,C. and Rine,J. (2004) The origin recognition complex links replication, sister chromatid cohesion and transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 167, 579-591.
72. Sjogren,C. and Nasmyth,K. (2001) Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol., 11, 991-995.
73. Strom,L., Lindroos,H.B., Shirahige,K. and Sjogren,C. (2004) Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell, 16, 1003-1015.
74. Cantor,S., Drapkin,R., Zhang,F., Lin,Y., Han,J., Pamidi,S. and Livingston,D.M. (2004) The BRCA1-associated protein BACH1 is a DNA helicase targeted by clinically relevant inactivating mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 2357-2362.