Development of a regression-based method with case-based tuning to solve the due date assignment problem

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 65-82

  Sha, D Y ^a,b   Storch, R L ^c   Liu, C H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b ASIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Due date assignment; Dynamic tuning; Regression based method

Indexed keywords

PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; RANDOM PROCESSES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SCHEDULING;

DUE DATE ASSIGNMENT; DYNAMIC TUNING; REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS; REGRESSION-BASED METHOD;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 33751501444     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540500507435     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chang, F.C.R., A study of factors affecting due-date predictability in a simulated dynamic job shop. J. Manuf. Syst., 1994, 13, 393-400.
2. Chang, Y.J. and Lee, C.E., A bottleneck based due date assignment methodology. Int. J. Manuf. Tech. Manage., 2000, 1, 318-327.
3. Cheng, T.C.E. and Jiang, J., Job shop scheduling for missed due-date performance. Comp. & Indust. Eng., 1998, 34, 297-307.
4. Chung, S.H., Yang, M.H. and Cheng, C.M., The design of due date assignment model and the determination of flow time control parameters for the wafer fabrication factories. IEEE Trans. on Camp., Pack., Manuf. Tech.-Part C, 1997, 20, 278-287.
5. Conway, R.W., Priority dispatching and job lateness in a job shop. J. Indust. Eng., 1965, 16, 228-237.
6. Eilon, S. and Chowdhury, I.G., Due date in job shop scheduling. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1976, 14, 223-238.
7. Enns, S.T., Job shop flow time prediction and tardiness control using queue analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1993, 31, 2045-2057.
8. Frank, E., Wang, Y., Inglis, S., Holmes, G. and Witten, I.H., Using model trees for classification. Mach. Learn., 1998, 32, 63-76.
9. Gee, E.S. and Smith, C.H., Selecting allowance policies for improved job shop performance. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1993, 31, 1839-1852.
10. Hsu, S.Y. and Sha, D.Y., Due date assignment using artificial neural networks under different shop floor control strategies. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2004, 42, 1727-1745.
11. Kim, Y.D., Kim, J.U., Lim, S.K. and Jun, H.B., Due-date based scheduling and control policies in a multiproduct semiconductor wafer fabrication facility. IEEE Trans. Semicon. Manuf., 1998, 11, 155-164.
12. Lawrence, S., Resource constrained project scheduling: an experimental investigation of heuristics scheduling techniques. Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University, 1984.
13. Moses, S., Grant, H., Gruenwald, L. and Pulat, S., Real-time due-date promising by build-to-order environments. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2004, 42, 4353-4375.
14. Philipoom, P.R., Rees, L.P. and Wiegmann, L., Using artificial neural networks to determine internally-set due date assignment for shop scheduling. Decision Sci., 1994, 25, 825-847.
15. Philipoom, P.R., Wiegmann, L. and Rees, L.P., Cost-based due-date assignment with the use of classical and neural-network approaches. Naval Res. Logist., 1997, 44, 21-46.
16. Quinlan, J.R., Learning with continuous classes, in Proceedings of 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992, pp. 343-348.
17. Quinlan, J.R., A case study in machine learning, in Proceedings of 16th Australian Computer Science Conference, Brisbane, 1993a, pp. 731-737.
18. Quinlan, J.R., Combining instance based and model based learning, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993b, pp. 236-243.
19. Ragatz, G.L. and Mabert, V.A., A simulation analysis of due date assignment rules. J. Op. Manage., 1984, 5, 27-39.
20. Roman, D.B. and Valle, A.G., Dynamic assignation of due dates in an assembly shop based in simulation. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1996, 34, 1539-1554.
21. Sha, D.Y. and Hsu, S.Y., Due-date assignment in wafer fabrication using artificial neural networks. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2004, 23, 768-775.
22. Smith, C.H., Minor, E.D. and Wen, H.J., Regression based due date assignment rules for improved assembly shop performance. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1995, 33, 2375-2385.
23. Tsai, C.-H., Chang, C.-T. and Li, R.-K., Integrating order release control with due-date assignment rules. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1996, 35, 3379-3392.
24. Udo, G.J., Neural networks applications in manufacturing process. Comp. Indust. Eng., 1992, 23, 97-100.
25. Vig, M.M. and Dooley, K.J., Mixing static and dynamic estimates for due date assignment. J. Op. Manage., 1993, 11, 67-79.
26. Vig, M.M. and Dooley, K.J., Dynamic rules for due date assignment. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1991, 29, 1361-1377.
27. Wang, Y. and Witten, I.H., Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes, in Proceedings of the Poster Papers of the European Conference on Machine Learning, University of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague, 1997, pp. 128-137.
28. Wein, L.M., Scheduling semiconductor wafer fabrication. IEEE Trans. Semicon. Manuf., 1988, 1, 115-130.