The evolution of internet genres

Computers and Composition

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 269-282

  Bauman, Marcy Lassota ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative writing; Composition; Genre theory; Hypertext; Writing pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033473973     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s8755-4615(99)00007-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (V. W. McGee, Trans.), C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bazerman, Charles. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Berkenkotter, Carol, & Huckin, Thomas. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition, Culture, Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
4. Bolter, Jay David. (1991). Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Devitt, Amy. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573-586.
6. Giltrow, Janet. (1994). Genre and the pragmatic concept of background knowledge. In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric (pp. 155-178). London: Taylor and Francis.
7. Haley-James, Shirley. (1993). Entries from a new e-mail user's notebook. Computers and Composition, 10(4) 5-10.
8. Harris, Joseph. (1997). Virtual citings. College Composition and Communication, 48(1). [Online]. Available: [April 21, 1999].
9. Johnson, Stephen. (1997). Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate. San Francisco, CA: HarperEdge.
10. Landow, George. (1992). Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
11. Lanham, Richard. (1990). Foreword. In Carolyn Handa (Ed.), Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-first Century (pp. 13-15). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton/Cook.
12. Lenzer, Robert, & Johnson, Stephen S. (1997, March 10). Seeing things as they really are. Forbes [Online, WWW]. Available: [March 24, 1997].
13. Lunsford, Andrea, & West, Susan. (1996). Intellectual property and composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 47(3), 383-412.
14. Miller, Carolyn R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
15. Moran, Charles. (1998). From a high-tech to a low-tech writing classroom: You can't go home again. Computers and Composition, 15(1), 1-10.
16. Moulthrop, Stuart. (1992). Toward a rhetoric of informating texts. In J. Nanard & M. Nanard (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext (pp. 171-180). Milan: Association for Computing Machinery.
17. The NODE Learning Technologies Network. (1999). [Online, WWW]. Available: [July 27, 1998].
18. NAWEB. (1997). [Online, WWW]. Available: [Oc-tober 2, 1997].
19. Rosenblatt, Louise. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
20. Samuelson, Pamela. (1998). The digital rights war. The Wilson Quarterly, 22, 48-53.
21. Seife, Cynthia, & Holdstein, Deborah. (1990). Computers and Writing: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: MLA Press.
22. Spooner, Michael, & Yancey, Kathleen. (1996). Postings on a genre of e-mail. College Composition and Communication, 47(2), 252-278.