Conservation, relocation and duplication in genome evolution

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 593-597

  Castillo Davis, Cristian I ^a   Hartl, Daniel L ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED RNA;

AUTOSOME; BACTERIUM; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EUKARYOTE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE CONTROL; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE FUNCTION; GENE LOCATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GERM LINE; HERMAPHRODITISM; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; X CHROMOSOME;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EUKARYOTA; NEMATODA;

EID: 0242380296     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.009     Document Type: Short Survey

References (47)

1. Kamath R.S., et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 421:2003;231-237.
2. Riedl R. Order in Living Organisms. 1978;John Wiley & Sons.
3. Raff R.A. The Shape of Life. 1996;University of Chicago Press.
4. Arthur W. The Origin of Animal Body Plans. 1997;Cambridge University Press.
5. Reinke V., et al. A global profile of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Mol. Cell. 6:2000;605-616.
6. Kelly W.G., et al. X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development. 129:2002;479-492.
7. Meyer B.J. Sex in the worm: counting and compensating X-chromosome dose. Trends Genet. 16:2000;247-253.
8. Rutherford S.L., Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 396:1998;336-342.
9. Meiklejohn C., Hartl D.L. A single mode of canalization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;468-473.
10. Parisi M., et al. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science. 299:2003;697-700.
11. Ranz J.M., et al. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science. 300:2003;1742-1745.
12. Boutanaev A.M., et al. Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. Nature. 420:2002;666-669.
13. Cohen B.A., et al. A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 26:2000;183-186.
14. Blumenthal T., et al. A global analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans operons. Nature. 417:2002;851-854.
15. Caron H., et al. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science. 291:2001;1289-1292.
16. Florens L., et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature. 419:2002;520-526.
17. Lercher M.J., et al. Coexpression of neighboring genes in Caenorhabditis elegans is mostly due to operons and duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13:2003;238-243.
18. Pal C., Hurst L.D. Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate. Nat. Genet. 33:2003;392-395.
19. Lercher M.J., et al. Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31:2002;180-183.
20. Gu Z., et al. Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature. 421:2003;63-66.
21. Lynch M., Force A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics. 154:2000;459-473.
22. Lynch M., Conery J.S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 290:2000;1151-1155.
23. Long, M. and Thornton, K. (2001) Gene duplication and evolution. Science 293, 1551a.
24. Zhang, L. et al. (2001) Gene duplication and evolution. Science 293, 1551a.
25. Lynch, M. and Conery, J.C. (2001) Gene duplication and evolution (reply). Science 293, 1551a.
26. Castillo-Davis C.I., Hartl D.L. Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2002;728-735.
27. Wilson A.C., et al. Biochemical evolution. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46:1977;573-639.
28. Hurst L.D., Smith N.G.C. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9:1999;747-750.
29. Hirsh A.E., Fraser H.B. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature. 411:2001;1046-1049.
30. Pál C., et al. Rate of evolution and gene dispensability. Nature. 421:2003;496-497.
31. Pál C., et al. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics. 158:2001;927-931.
32. Jordan I.K., et al. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in Bacteria. Genome Res. 12:2002;962-968.
33. Fraser H.B., et al. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science. 296:2002;750-752.
34. Jordan I.K., et al. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:2003;1.
35. Fraser H.B., et al. A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:2003;11.
36. Yang J., et al. Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;772-774.
37. Papp B., et al. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature. 424:2003;194-197.
38. Rice W.R. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution. 2002:1984;735-742.
39. Chippindale A.K., et al. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;1671-1675.
40. Gibson J.R., et al. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 269:2002;499-505.
41. Rogers D.W., et al. Male genes: X-pelled or X-cluded? BioEssays. 25:2003;739-741.
42. Wu C.-I., Xu Y.E. Sexual antagonism and X inactivation - the SAXI hypothesis. Trends Genet. 19:2003;243-247.
43. Wang P.J., et al. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat. Genet. 27:2001;422-426.
44. Lercher M.J., et al. Evidence that the human X chromosome is enriched for male-specific but not female-specific genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;1113-1116.
45. Li Y.J., et al. Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: application of the maximum likelihood method. Genes Genet. Syst. 74:1999;117-127.
46. Wall J.D. Estimating ancestral population sizes and divergence times. Genetics. 163:2003;395-404.
47. Betran E., et al. Retroposed new genes out of the X in Drosophila. Genome Res. 12:2002;1854-1859.