Revealing two-state protein-protein interactions of calmodulin by single-molecule spectroscopy

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 31, 2006, Pages 10034-10042

  Liu, Ruchuan ^a   Hu, Dehong ^a   Tan, Xin ^a   Lu, H Peter ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY; OLIGOMERS; POLARIZATION;

CALMODULIN (CAM); CONFORMATIONAL DYNAMICS; FLUORESCEIN-BASED ARSENICAL HAIRPIN BINDER (FLASH); FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER (FRET);

PROTEINS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE (CALCIUM); AMINO ACID; ARSENIC; CALMODULIN; FLUORESCEIN; PEPTIDE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL INTERACTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OLIGOMERIZATION; POLARIZATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE MOLECULE SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY;

CALMODULIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 33746969931     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja057005m     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Moerner, W. E.; Orrit, M. Science 1999, 283 (5408), 1670-1676.
2. Nie, S.; Zare, R. N. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 1997, 26, 567-596.
3. Weiss, S. Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Single Biomolecules. Science 1999, 283 (5408), 1676-1683.
4. For reviews, see: Acc. Chem. Res. (special issue on single molecule spectroscopy) 2005, 38 (7).
5. For a review, see: Protein-Ligand Interactions; Nienhaus, G. U., Ed.; Humana Press: New Jersey. 2005.
6. Chin, D.; Means, A. R. Trends in Cell Biology 2000, 10 (8), 322-328.
7. James, P.; Vorherr, T.; Carafoli, E. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995, 20 (1), 38-42.
8. Babu, Y. S.; Sack, J. S.; Greenhough, T. J.; Bugg, C. E.; Means, A. R.; Cook, W. J. Nature 1985, 315, 37-40.
9. Chattopadhyaya, R.; Meadorl, W. E.; Means, A. R.; Quiocho, F. A. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 228 (4), 1177-1192.
10. Kuboniwa, H.; Tjandra, N.; Grzesiek, S.; Ren, H.; Klee, C. B.; Bax, A. Nature Structural Biology 1995, 2 (9), 768-776.
11. Vetter, S. W.; Leclerc, E. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003, 270, 404-414.
12. Drum, C. L.; Yan, S.-Z.; Bard, J.; Shen, Y.-Q.; Lu, D.; Soelaiman, S.; Grabarek, Z.; Bohm, A.; Tang, W.-J. Nature 2002, 415, 396-402.
13. Meador, W. E.; Means, A. R.; Quiocho, F. A. Science 1992, 257, 1251-1255.
14. Schumacher, M. A.; Rivard, A. F.; Bächinger, H. P.; Adelman, J. P. Nature 2001, 410, 1120-1124.
15. Elshorst, B.; Hennig, M.; Försterling, H.; Diener, A.; Maurer, M.; Schulte, P.; Schwalbe, H.; Griesinger, C.; Krebs, J.; Schmid, H.; Vorherr, T.; Carafoli, E. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 12320-12332.
16. Ikura, M.; Clore, G. M.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Zhu, G.; Klee, C. B.; Bax, A. Science 1992, 256 (5057), 632-638.
17. Osawa, M.; Tokumitsu, H.; Swindells, M. B.; Kurihara, H.; Orita, M.; Shibanuma, T.; Furuya, T.; Ikura, M. Nature Structural Biology 1999, 6 (9), 819-824.
18. Zhang, M.; Tanaka, T.; Ikura, M. Nature Structural Biology 1995, 2 (9), 758-767.
19. Chen, B.; Mayer, M. U.; Markillie, L. M.; Stenoien, D. L.; Squier, T. C. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 905-914.
20. Chapman, E. R.; Alexander, K.; Vorherr, T.; Carafoli, E.; Storm, D. R. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 12819-12825.
21. Small, E. W.; Anderson, S. R. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 7 (1), 418-428.
22. Sun, H.; Squier, T. C. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275 (3), 1731-1738.
23. Yao, Y.; Squier, T. C. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 6815-6827.
24. Chang, S.-L.; Szabo, A.; Tjandra, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, (37), 11379-11384.
25. Baber, J. L.; Szabo, A.; Tjandra, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3953-3959.
26. Evenäs, J.; Forsén, S.; Malmendal, A.; Akke, M. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289, 603-617.
27. Johnson, J. D.; Snyder, C.; Walsh, M.; Flynn, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271 (2), 761-767.
28. Kasturi, R.; Vasulka, C.; Johnson, J. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268 (11), 7958-7964.
29. Malmendal, A.; Evenäs, J.; Forsén, S.; Akke, M. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293, 883-899.
30. Peersen, O. B.; Madsen, T. S.; Falke, J. J. Protein Science 1997, 6 (4), 794-807.
31. Yao, Y.; Schöneich, C.; Squier, T. C. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 7797-7810.
32. Slaughter, B. D.; Allen, M. W.; Unruh, J. R.; Urbauer, R. J. B.; Johnson, C. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10388-10397.
33. Tan, X.; Hu, D.; Squier, T. C.; Lu, H. P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85 (12), 2420-2422.
34. Tang, J.; Mei, E.; Green, C.; Kaplan, J.; DeGrado, W. F.; Smith, A. B., III; Hochstrasser, R. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 15910-15918.
35. Osborn, K. D.; Bartlett, R. K.; Mandal, A.; Zaidi, A.; Urbauer, R. J. B.; Urbauer, J. L.; Galeva, N.; Williams, T. D.; Johnson, C. K. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 12937-12944.
36. Brasselet, S.; Peterman, E. J. G.; Miyawaki, A.; Moerner, W. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 3676-3682.
37. Adams, S. R.; Campbell, R. E.; Gross, L. A.; Martin, B. R.; Walkup, G. K.; Yao, Y.; Llopis, J.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (21), 6063-6076.
38. Griffin, B. A.; Adams, S. R.; Tsien, R. Y. Science 1998, 281, 269-272.
39. Chen, B.; Mayer, M. U.; Squie, T. C. Biochemistry 2005, 44 (12), 4737-4747.
40. Vorherr, T.; James, P.; Krebs, J.; Enyedi, A.; McCormick, D. J.; Penniston, J. T.; Carafoli, E. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 355-365.
41. Yao, Y.; Gao, J.; Squier, T. C. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 12015-12028.
42. Kranz, J. K.; Flynn, P. F.; Fuentes, E. J.; Wand, A. J. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 2599-2608.
43. Hu, D.; Lu, H. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (2), 618-626.
44. A threshold criterion was applied to the photon counts of both channels before a calculation of FRET efficiency, to remove experimental points where the photon counts are due to the fluctuation of background and/or cross-talk from the other channel. The threshold criterion equals 2× the standard deviation from the background and the cross-talk, assuming that the uncertainty is due to photon-counting shot noise in the background and the cross-talk.
45. Crivici, A.; Ikura, M. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 1995, 24 (1), 85-116.
46. Ehrhardt, M. R.; Urbauer, J. L.; Wand, A. J. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 4 (9), 2731-2738.
47. -1, the final concentration of each component in the mixture of CaM and C28W in the single-molecule FRET experiments are expected to be approximately C28W 9.802 nM, CaM 0.202 nM, and CaM/ C28W 0.198 nM, respectively. Though, the expected concentration ratio between CaM and CaM/C28W is close to 1:1, in the FRET experiments, the CaM/C28W appeared at a lower concentration, due to reasons, such as (1) the C28W peptide is not 100% labeled and (2) the interaction between CaM and C28W is in dynamics, and there are some times that CaM/C28W becomes dissociated.
48. First, the energy transfer acceptor Texas Red is linked to the peptide by a single bond and should be very flexible. Both molecular structure modeling and time-resolved anisotropy of the tethered Texas Red have shown a large rotational freedom of the Texas Red probe (see Supporting Information for detail). Its orientation should be averaged within the time bin and is unlikely to contribute to a large change of the FRET efficiency, reflected by 2.3 times in the energy transfer rate (FRET efficiency change from 0.43 to 0.65). Second, the energy transfer donor FlAsH is locked in the matrix of the N-terminal domain of CaM, and its orientation change has to be induced by the conformational change of CaM.
49. Bartko, A. P.; Xu, K.; Dickson, R. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89 (2), 026101-026104.
50. Adachi, K.; Yasuda, R.; Noji, H.; Itoh, H.; Harada, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Kinosita, K. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97 (13), 7243-7247.
51. Yasuda, R.; Noji, H.; Kazuhiko Kinosita, J.; Yoshida, M. Cell 1998, 93 (7), 1117-1124.
52. Sun, H.; Yin, D.; Squier, T. C. Biochemistry 1999, 38 (38), 12266-12279.
53. Since the lysines at the central helix elements of CaM are more accessible to the bifunctional linker molecules used in the tethering process, most CaM molecules in the polarization measurements are expected to be linked to the glass surface through its central part. Therefore, once the C28W peptide interacts with CaM, especially in the intermediate state (if exist), the N-terminal domain of CaM changing from unbound to bound with C28W, the restriction on the conformation freedom of the N-terminal domain of CaM changes dramatically. This can be reflected by the distribution and dynamics of fluorescence polarization of the FlAsH dye molecules labeled there.
54. Seaton, B. A.; Head, J. F.; Engelman, D. M.; Richards, F. M. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 6740-6743.
55. Heidorn, D. B.; Seeger, P. A.; Rokop, S. E.; Blumenthal, D. K.; Means, A. R.; Crespi, H.; Trewhella, J. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 6757-6764.
56. Chou, J. J.; Li, S.; Klee, C. B.; Bax, A. Nature Structural Biology 2001, 8 (11), 990-997.
57. Wilson, M. A.; Brunger, A. T. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 301, 1237-1256.
58. Jaren, O. R.; Kranz, J. K.; Sorensen, B. R.; Wand, A. J.; Shea, M. A. Biochemistry 2002, 41 (48), 14158-14166.
59. Fallon, J. L.; Quiocho, F. A. Structure 2003, 11 (10), 1303-1307.
60. Finn, B. E.; Evenäs, J.; Drakenberg, T.; Waltho, J. P.; Thulin, E.; Forsén, S. Nature Structural Biology 1995, 2 (9), 777-783.
61. Tan, X.; Nalbant, P.; Toutchkine, A.; Hu, D.; Vorpagel, E. R.; Hahn, K. M.; Lu, H. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (2), 737-744.
62. Lu, H. P.; Iakoucheva, L. M.; Ackerman, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123 (37), 9184-9185.