Reconciling the "old" and "new" views of protein allostery: A molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY)

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 846-867

  Fonnaneck, Mark S ^a   Ma, Liang ^a   Cui, Qiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Allosteric transition; Induced fit; Molecular dynamics; Population shift; Signal transduction; Structural flexibility

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHEMOTAXIS Y PROTEIN; THREONINE; TYROSINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLOSTERISM; ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ISOMERIZATION; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; THREONINE; TYROSINE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 33646776723     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20893     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD. Molecular biology of the cell. Garland; 1994.
2. Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux JP. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol 1965;12:88-118.
3. Koshland DE Jr, Nemethy G, Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochem 1966;5:365-385.
4. Szabo A, Karplus M. A mathematical model for structure-function relations in hemoglobin. J Mol Biol 1972;72:163-197.
5. Cooper A, Dryden D. Allostery without conformational change. Eur Biophy J 1984;11:103-109.
6. Perutz MF. Stereochemistry of cooperative effects in haemoglobin. Nature 1970;228:726-739.
7. Ma J, Sigler PB, Xu Z, Karplus M. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J Mol Biol 2000;302:303-313.
8. Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958;44:98-104.
9. Ottemann KM, Xiao W, Shin YK, Koshland DEJ. A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor. Science; 285:1751-1754.
10. Yu EW, Koshland DE Jr. Propagating conformational changes over long (and short) distances in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:9517-9520.
11. Vanvliet F, Xi XG, Destaercke C, Dewannemaeker B, Jacobs A, Cherfils J, Ladjimi MM, Herve G, Cunin R. Heterotropic interactions in aspartate transcarbamoylase-turning allosteric ATP activation into inhibition as a consequence of a single tyrosine to phenylalanine mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:9180-9183.
12. Pardanani A, Gibson QH, Colotti G, Royer WE. Mutation of residue phe97 to Leu disrupts the central allosteric pathway in Scapharca dimeric hemoglobin. J Mol Biol 1997;272:13171-13179.
13. Ito K, Uyeda QP, Suzuki Y, Sutoh K, Yamamoto K. Requirement of domain-domain interaction for conformational change and functional ATP hydrolysis in myosin. J Biol Chem 2003;278: 31049-31057.
14. Sasaki N, Ohkura R, Sutoh K. Dictyostelium myosin ii mutations that uncouples the converter swing and ATP hydrolysis cycle. Biochemistry 2003;42:90-95.
15. Heidary DK, Roy M, Daumy GO, Cong Y, Jennings PA. Long-range coupling between separate docking sites in interleukin-1β. J Mol Biol 2005;353:1187-1198.
16. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999; 286:295-299.
17. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2003;10:59-69.
18. Shulman AI, Larson C, Mangelsdorf DJ, Ranganathan R. Structural determinants of allosteric ligand activation in RXR heterodimers. Cell 2004;116:417-429.
19. Clarkson MW, Lee AL. Long-range dynamic effects of point mutations propagate through sidechains in the serine protease inhibitor eglin c. Biochemistry 2004;43:12448-12458.
20. Palmer AG. NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomolecules. Chem Rev 2004;104:3623-3640.
21. Eisenmesser EZ, Bosco DA, Akke M, Kern D. Enzyme dynamics during catalysis. Science 2002;295:1520-1523.
22. Wolft-Watz M, Thai V, Henzler-Wildman K, Hadjipavlou G, Eisenmesser EZ, Kern D. Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:945-949.
23. Volkman BF, Lipson D, Wemmer DE, Kern D. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 2001; 291:2429-2433.
24. Rueda D, Bokinsky G, Rhodes MM, Rust MJ, Zhuang XW, Walter NG. Single-molecule enzymology of RNA: essential functional groups impact catalysis from a distance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:10066-10071.
25. Kern D, Zuiderweg ERP. The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:748-757.
26. Gunasekaran K, Ma B, Nussinov R. Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? Proteins 2004;57:433-443.
27. Pan H, Lee JC, Hilser VJ. Binding sites in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase communicate by modulating the conformational ensemble. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:12020-12025.
28. Hilser VJ, Freire E. Structure-based calculation of the equilibrium folding pathway of proteins: correlation with hydrogen exchange protection factors. J Mol Biol 1996;262:756-772.
29. Hilser VJ, Dowdy D, Oas TG, Freíre E. The structural distribution of cooperative interactions in proteins: analysis of the native state ensemble. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:9903-9908.
30. Whitten ST, Garcia-Moreno B, Hilser VJ. Local conformational fluctuations can modulate the coupling between proton binding and global structural transitions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:4282-4287.
31. Blair DF. How bacteria sense and swim. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995;49:489-522.
32. Falke JJ, Bass RB, Butler SL, Chervitz SA, Danielson MA. The two-compenent signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1997;13:457-512.
33. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:1024-1037.
34. Silversmith RE, Bourret RB. Throwing the switch in bacterial chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol 1999;7:16-22.
35. Djordjevic S, Stock AM. Structural analysis of bacterial chemotaxis proteins: components of a dynamic signaling system. J Struct Biol 1998;124:189-200.
36. Stock A, Robinson V, Goudreau P. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 2000;69:183-215.
37. Simonovio M, Volz K. A distinct meta-active conformation in the 1.1 Å resolution structure of wild-type apo-CheY. J Biol Chem 2001;276:28637-28640.
38. Lee S-Y, Cho HS, Pelton JG, Yan D, Henderson RK, King DS, Shar Huang L, Kustu S, Berry EA, Wemmer DE. Crystal structure of an activated response regulator bound to its target. Nat Struct Biol 2001;1:52-56.
39. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD-visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics 1996;14:33-38.
40. Dyer C, Quillin M, Campos A, Lu J, McEvoy M, Hausrath A, Westbrook E, Matsumura P, Matthews B, Dahlquist F. Structure of the constitutively active double mutant CheY(D13K) Y-106W alone and in complex with a flim peptide. J Mol Biol 2004;342: 1325-1335.
41. Toker AS, Macnab RM. Distinct regions of bacterial flagellar switch protein FliM interact with FliG, FliN and CheY. J Mol Biol 1997;273:623-634.
42. Zhu X, Amsler C, Volz K, Matsumura P. Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1996;178:4208-4215.
43. Frauenfelden H, McMahon BH, Austin RH, Chu K, Groves JT. The role of structure, energy landscape, dynamics and allostery in the enzymatic function of myoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2370-2374.
44. Rostovtseva TK, Liu TT, Colombini M, Parsegian VA, Bezrukov SM. Positive cooperativity without domains or subunits in a monomeric membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 7819-7822.
45. Volz K. Structural conservation in the CheY superfamily. Biochemistry 1993;32:11741-11753.
46. Cho HS, Lee S-Y, Yan D, Pan X, Parkinson J, Kustu S, Wemmer DE, Pelton JG. NMR structure of activated CheY. J Mol Biol 2000;297:543-551.
47. Lee S-Y, Cho HS, Pelton JG, Yan D, Berry EA, Wemmer DE. Crystal structure of activated CheY. J Biol Chem 2001;276:16425-16431.
48. Birck C, Mourey L, Gouet P, Fabry B, Schumacher J, Rousseau P, Kahn D, Samama J-P. Confromational changes induced by phosphorylation of the FixJ receiver domain. Structure 1999;7: 1505-1515.
49. Lewis RJ, Brannigan JA, Muchová K, Barák I, Wilkinson AJ. Phosphorylated aspartate in the structure of a response regulator protein. J Mol Biol 1999;294:9-15.
50. Barak R, Eisenbach M. Correlation between phosphorylation of the chemotaxis protein CheY and its activity at the flagellar motor. Biochemistry 1992;31:1821-1826.
51. Appleby JL, Bourret RB. Proposed signal transduction role for conserved CheY residue Thr87, a member of the response regulator active-site quintet, J Bacteriol 1998;180:3563-3569.
52. Volz K, Matsumura P. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli CheY refined at 1.7 Å resolution, J Biol Chem 1991;266:15511-15519.
53. Roche P, Mouawad L, Perahia D, Samama J-P, Kahn D. Mo dynamics of the FixJ receiver domain: movement of the β4-α4 loop c with the in and out flip of Phe101. Protein Sci 2002;11:2622-2630.
54. Aqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE. A new method for predicting affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Eng 1994;7:385-391.
55. Cui Q, Li G, Ma J, Karplus M. A normal mode analysis of structural plasticity in the biomolecular motor F1-ATPase. J Mol Biol 2004;340:345-372.
56. 2+-ATPase. Biophys J 2004;86:743-763.
57. Ma J, Karplus M. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin groEL: a dynamic analysis. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998;95:8502-8507.
58. Ma J, Karplus M. Ligand induced conformational changes in ras p21: a normal mode and energy minimization analysis. J Mol Biol 1997;274:114-131.
59. Johnson LN, Lewis RJ. Structural basis for control by phosphorylation. Chem Rev 2001;101:2209-2242.
60. Gsponer J, Haberthur U, Caflisch A. The role of sidechain interactions in the early steps of aggregation: molecular dynamics simulations of an amyloid-forming peptide from the yeast prion Sup35. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5154-5159.
61. Masunov A, Lazaridis T. Potentials of mean force between ionizable amino acid sidechains in water. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1722-1730.
62. Yu ZY, Jacobson MP, Josovitz J, Rapp CS, Friesner RA. First-shell solvation of ion-pairs: correction of systematic errors in implicit solvent models. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:6643-6654.
63. Zhou R, Krilov G, Berne BJ. Comment on "Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a beta-hairpin folding in water?": the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:7528-7530.
64. Shukla D, Zhu XY, Matsumura P. Flagellar motor-switch binding face of CheY and the biochemical basis of suppression by CheY mutants that compensate for motor-switch defects in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1998;273:23993-23999.
65. Zhu X, Volz K, Matsumura P. The CheZ-binding surface of chey overlaps the CheA- and FliM-binding surface, J Biol Chem 1997;272:23758-23764.
66. Schuster M, Abouhamad WN, Silversmith RE, Bourret RB. Chemotactic response regulator mutant CheY95IV exhibits enhanced binding to the flagellar switch and phosphorylation-dependent constitutive signalling. Mol Microbiol 1998;27:1065-1075.
67. Schuster M, Zhao R, Bourret RB, Collins EJ. Correlated switch binding and signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 2000;275:19752-19758.
68. Zhao R, Collins EJ, Bourret RB, Silversmith RE. Structure and catalytic mechanism of the E. coli chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:570-575.
69. Schuster M, Silversmith RE, Bourret RB. Conformational coupling in the chemotaxis response regulator CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:6003-6008.
70. Lukat G, Lee B, Mottonen J, Stock A, Stock J. Roles of the highly conserved aspartate and lysine residues in the response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 1991;266:8348-8354.
71. 2+ and conformation of the chemotaxis protein CheY on its binding to the flagellar switch protein FliM, Biochemistry 1994;33:10470-10476.
72. Knowles JR. Enzyme catalysis: not different, just better. Nature 1991;350:121-124.
73. Jardetzky O. Protein dynamics and Conformational transitions in allosteric proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1996;65:171-219.
74. Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 2003;301:1196-1202.
75. McElheny D, Schnell JR, Lansing JC, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Defining the role of active-site loop fluctuations in dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:5032-5037.
76. Radkiewicz JL, Brooks CL. Protein dynamics in enzymatic catalysis: exploration of dihydrofolate reductase. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:225-231.
77. Vale RD, Milligan RA. The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. Science 2000;288:88-95.
78. Houdusse A, Sweeney HL. Myosin motors: missing structures and hidden springs. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:182-194.
79. Rod TH, Radkiewicz JL, Brooks CL. Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:6980-6985.
80. Mouawad L, Perahia D. Motions in hemoglobin studied by normal mode analysis and energy minimization: Evidence for the existence of tertiary t-like, quaternary r-like intermediate structures, J. Mol. Biol. 1996;258:393-410.
81. Xu CY, Tobi D, Bahar I. Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T → R2 transition. J Mol Biol 2003;333:153-168.
82. Vitkup D, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Karplus M. Solvent mobility and the protein "glass" transition. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:34-38.
83. Fenimore PW, Franuenfelder H, McMahon BH, Parak FG. Slaving: solvent fluctuations dominate protein dynamics and functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:16047-16051.
84. Higo J, Sasai M, Shirai H, Nakamura H, Takaki K. Large vortex-like structure of dipole field in computer models of liquid water and dipole-bridge between biomolecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:5961-5964.
85. Royer WE, Pardanan A, Gibson QH, Peterson ES, Friedman JM. Ordered water molecules as key allosteric mediators in a cooperative dimeric hemoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93: 14526-14531.
86. Zheng WJ, Brooks BR. Identification of dynamical correlations within the myosin motor domain by the normal mode analysis of an elastic network model. J Mol Biol 2005;346:745-759.
87. Fischer S, Windshugel B, Horak D, Holmes KC, Smith JC. Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the myosin molecular motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:6873-6878.
88. Ma J, Flynn TC, Cui Q, Leslie AGW, Walker JE, Karplus M. A dynamic analysis of the rotation mechanism for Conformational change in fl-ATPase. Structure 2002;10:921-931.
89. Radhakrishnan R, Schlick T. Orchestration of cooperative events in DNA synthesis and repair mechanism unraveled by transition path sampling of DNA polymerase beta's closing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:5970-5975.
90. Miyashita O, Onuchio JN, Wolynes PG. Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:12570-12575.
91. Ota N, Agard DA. Intramolecular signaling pathways revealed by modeling anisotropic thermal diffusion. J Mol Biol 2005;351: 345-354.
92. Im WP, Lee MS, Brooks CL. Generalized Born model with a simple smoothing function. J Comput Chem 2003;24:1691-1702.
93. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983; 4:187-217.
94. MacKerell ADJ, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL Jr, Evenseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnin L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WEI, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiórkiewicz- Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
95. Neria E, Fischen S, Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 1996;105:1902-1921.
96. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935.
97. Almlof M, Brandsdal BO, Aqvist J. Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: examination of the linear interaction energy method. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1242-1254.
98. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
99. Tama F, Sanejouand Y. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng 2001;14:1-6.
100. Hansson T, Mafelius J, Åqvist J. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 1998;12:27-35.