Taxonomy for science and engineering indicators: A reassessment

Research Evaluation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 239-248

  Feeney, Mary Kathleen ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646364313     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154405781776139     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Z J Acs (1999), 'Public policies to support new technology-based firms (NTBFs)', Science and Public Policy, pages 247-257.
2. J P Beltramo, J J Paul and C Perret (2001), The recruitment of researchers and the organization of scientific activity in industry', International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7-8), pages 811-834.
3. S S Blume (1974), Toward a Political Sociology of Science (Free Press, New York, USA).
4. P Bourke and L Butler (1998), 'Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research', Research Policy, 26(6), pages 711-718.
5. B Bozeman and E Corley (2004), 'Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital', Research Policy, 33(4), pages 599-616.
6. B Bozeman and J Dietz (2001), 'Strategic research partnerships: constructing policy-relevant indicators', Journal of Technology Transfer, 4, 26 October, pages 385-393.
7. W R Burr and G K Leigh (1983), 'Famology: a new discipline', Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(3), August, pages 467-480.
8. A Cambrosio and P Keating (1983), The disciplinary stake: the case of chronobiology', Social Studies of Science, 13(3), August, pages 323-353.
9. I Chompalov, J Genuth and W Shrum (2002), The organization of scientific collaborations', Research Policy, 31(5), July, pages 749-767.
10. D E Chubin (1976), The conceptualization of scientific specialties', Sociological Quarterly, 17, pages 448-476.
11. M Crow and B Bozeman (1998), Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories in the US National Innovation System (Columbia University Press, New York, USA).
12. J Dietz (2004), 'Scientists and engineers in academic research centers: an examination of career patterns and productivity', unpublished PhD dissertation, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
13. J Dietz and B Bozeman (in press), 'Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital,' Research Policy.
14. I I Feller, C P Ailes and J D Roessner (2002), 'Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers', Research Policy, 31(3), March, pages 457-474.
15. I Feller, G Gamota and W Valdez (2003), 'Developing science indicators for basic science offices with mission agencies', Research Evaluation, 12(1), April, pages 71-79.
16. N Forbes and D Wield (2004), 'What is R&D? Why does it matter?', Science and Public Policy, 31(4), August, pages 267278.
17. M F Fox and P Stephan (2001), 'Careers of young scientists: preferences, prospects and realities by gender and field', Social Studies of Science, 31(1), February, pages 109-122.
18. M Fritsch and G Franke (2004), 'Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation', Research Policy, 33(2), March, pages 245-255.
19. M Gaughan and B Bozeman (2002), 'Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research center grant with research center funding', Research Evaluation, 11(1), pages 17-26.
20. O Granstrand (1999), 'Internationalization of corporate R&D: a study of Japanese and Swedish corporations', Research Policy, 28(2-3), March, pages 275-30.
21. B C Griffins and N C Mullins (1972). 'Coherent social groups in scientific change', Science, New Series, 177(4053), 15 September, pages 959-964.
22. D Hicks, T Breitzman, D Olivastro and K Hamilton (2001), The changing composition of innovative activity in the US: a portrait based on patent analysis', Research Policy, 30(4), April, pages 681-703.
23. M Hirschey and V J Richardson (2004), 'Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?', Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), pages 91-107.
24. S Jacobbsson (2002), 'Universities and industrial transformation: an interpretative and selective literature study with special emphasis on Sweden', Science and Public Policy, pages 345-365.
25. R Johnston and D Robbins (1977), The development of specialties in industrialized science', Sociological Review, 25, pages 87-108.
26. B H Kwasnik (1999), The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery', Library Trends, 48(1), Summer, pages 22-47.
27. C Langinier (2004), 'Are patents strategic barriers to entry?', Journal of Economics and Business, 56(5), Sept-Oct, pages 349-361.
28. S Lee and B Bozeman (in press) The effects of scientific collaboration on productivity', Social Studies of Science.
29. M-W Lin and B Bozeman (in press) 'Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: a scientific and technical human capital explanation', Journal of Technology Transfer.
30. X L Liu and S White (2001), 'An exploration into regional variation in innovative activity in China', International Journal of Technology Management, 21(1-2), pages 114-129.
31. P E Longo et al (2000), 'Reengineering engineering research and education in Brazil: cooperative networks and coalitions', Science and Public Policy, pages 37-44.
32. F Malerba and L Orsenigo (1999), Technological entry, exit and survival: an empirical analysis of patent data', Research Policy, 28(6), August, pages 643-660.
33. S G McMillan, F Narin and D L Deeds (2000), 'An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology', Research Policy, 29(1), January, pages 1-8.
34. W E Moore (1970), The Professions: Roles and Rules (Russell Sage, New York, USA).
35. F Morillo, M Bordons and I Gomez (2003), 'Interdisciplinary in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), pages 1237-1249.
36. M J Mulkay and D O Edge (1973), 'Cognitive, technical ad social factors in growth of radio astronomy', Social Science Information sur Les Sciences Sociales, 12(6), pages 25-61.
37. National Academies of Sciences (2000a), Building a Workforce for the Information Economy (National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA).
38. National Academies of Science (2000b), Forecasting Demand of Supply of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers: Report of a Workshop on Methodology (National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA).
39. National Academies of Sciences (2004), Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study (National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA).
40. National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education (1991), Classification of Instructional Programs - CIP, Series, Code and Title Listing -1990 Update. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, July (Washington DC, USA).
41. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2004a), Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, and 2003, NSF 04-310, Project Officer, Ronald L Meeks (Arlington, VA, USA).
42. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2004b), Federal Obligations for Research by Agency and Detailed Field of Science and Engineering: Fiscal Years 1970-2002, NSF 04-313, Project Officer, Ronald L. Meeks (Arlington, VA, USA).
43. Y Okubo and C Sjöberg (2000), The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden', Research Policy, 29(1), January, pages 81-98.
44. R D Pearce (1999), 'Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs)', Research Policy, 28 (2-3), March, pages 157-178.
45. D K Phillips (1973), 'Sociologists and their knowledge', in E Freidson (editor), The Professions and Their Prospects (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, USA).
46. A L Porter et al (2002), 'Measuring national "emerging technology"', Science and Public Policy, pages 189-200.
47. S R Ranganathan (1967), Prolegomena to Library Classification, 3rd edition (Asia Publishing House, Bombay, India).
48. E J Rinia, T N. van Leeuwen, HG van Vuren and A F J van Raan (2001), 'Influence of interdisciplinary on peer-review and bibliometric evaluation in physics research', Research Policy, 30(3), March, pages 357-361.
49. J-P Robitaille and B Godin (2002), 'Evaluation of governments' scientific output: a bibliometric profile of Canada', Science and Public Policy, pages 59-68.
50. A K Salter and B R Martin (2001), The economic benefit of publicly funded basic research: a critical review', Research Policy, 30(3), March, pages 509-532.
51. D Schartinger, C Rammer, M M Fischer and J Frolich (2002), 'Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants', Research Policy, 31(3), March, pages 303-328.
52. J Sczacki (1979) History of Sociological Thought (Greenwood, Westport, CT, USA).
53. H Small (1999), 'A passage through science: crossing disciplinary boundaries', Library Trends, 48, pages 72-108.
54. R J W Tijssen (2001), 'Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of sciencetechnology interactions and knowledge flows', Research Policy, 30(1), January, pages 35-54.
55. R J W Tijssen (2004), 'Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles', Research Policy, 33(5), July, pages 709-733.
56. US General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services Division (1998), Information Technology: Assessment of the Department of Commerce's Report on Workforce Demand and Supply, GAP/HEHS 98 106R. Washington DC, 20 March 20.
57. B van Looy et al (2004), 'Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew effect?', Research Policy, 33(3), April, pages 425-441.
58. P Weingart and N Stehr (editors) (1999), Practising Interdisciplinarity (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada).
59. R Whitley (1976), 'Umbrella and polytheistic scientific disciplines and their elites', Social Studies of Science, 6(3/4), Special Issue: Aspects of the Sociology of Science: Papers from a Conference, University of York, UK, 16-18 September, pages 471-197.