Technological entry, exit and survival: An empirical analysis of patent data

Research Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 643-660

  Malerba, Franco ^a   Orsenigo, Luigi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^b BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Entry and exit; Industrial dynamics; Innovation; Patents

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001358246     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00005-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D.B., 1991. Technological Regimes, Learning and Industry Turbulence, WZB, Berlin, mimeo.
2. Audretsch, D., 1997. Technological regimes, industrial demography and the evolution of industrial structures. Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1), 49-82.
3. Baldwin, J., 1995. The Dynamics of Industrial Competition. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
4. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1997. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. CESPRI, Working Paper. Bocconi University, Milano.
5. Cefis, E., 1996. Is there any persistence in innovative activities? Working Paper No. 6, Department of Economics, University of Trento.
6. Dunne, T., Roberts, M.J., Samuelson, L., 1988. Patterns of firm entry and exit in the US manufacturing industries. Rand Journal of Economics 35, 567-581.
7. Griliches, Z., 1990. Patents statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28.
8. Geroski, P., 1994. Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
9. Geroski, P.A., Van Reenen, J., Walters, C.F., 1997. How persistently do firms innovate? Research Policy, forthcoming 26, 1, 33-49.
10. Kamien, M., Schwartz, N., 1982. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
11. Klepper, S., 1996. Entry, exit and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review 86, 562-583.
12. Lundvall, B.A., 1993. National System of Innovation, Frances Pinter, London.
13. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1995. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (1), 47-65.
14. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology specific. Research Policy 25, 451-478.
15. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1999. Technological entry and diversification in Europe, the United States and Japan: 1978-91. In: Gambardella, A., Malerba, F. (Eds.). The Organization of Innovative Activity in Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
16. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., Peretto, P., 1997. Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (6), 801-827.
17. Nelson, R., 1993. National Innovation System. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
18. Schumpeter, J.A., 1912. Theory of Economic Development, published in 1934. Harvard Economic Studies, Cambridge.
19. Schumpeter, J.A., 1939. Business Cycles. McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York.
21. Utterback, J., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Univ. Press, Boston, MA.