Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows

Research Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 35-54

  Tijssen, Robert J W ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Internationalizaton; Knowledge spillovers; Patent citations; Science technology linkages; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038722827     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00080-3     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archibugi D. Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review. Science and Public Policy. 19:1992;357-368.
2. Basberg B. Patents and measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research Policy. 16:1987;131-141.
3. Carpenter M.P., Narin F. Validation study: patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information. 5:1983;180-185.
4. Carpenter M.P., Cooper M., Narin F. Linkage between basic research and patents. Research Management. 23:1980;30-35.
5. David P.A., Mowery D., Steinmüller E. Analysing the economic payoffs from basic research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2:1992;73-90.
6. EC - European Commission, 1997. Second European Report on S&T Indicators Report 1997, Brussels.
7. Fagerberg J. Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature. 32:1994;1147-1175.
8. Faulkner W., Senker J. Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy. 23:1994;673-695.
9. Garfield E. How ISI selects journals for coverage: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Current Contents. 22:1990;5-13.
10. Gibbons M., Johnston R. The roles of science in technological innovations. Research Policy. 3:1974;220-242.
11. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage, London.
12. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics. 10:1979;92-116.
13. Griliches, Z., 1996. R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurement issues. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Blackwell, Oxford.
14. Grupp H. Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 6:1996;175-197.
15. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., 1992. Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referring between patents and papers: dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In: Grupp, H. (Ed.), Dynamics of Science-based Innovation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. Grupp H., Schmoch U. Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Research Policy. 28:1999;377-396.
17. Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review. 79:1989;957-970.
18. Katz J.S., Hicks D. Questions of collaboration. Nature. 375:1995;99.
19. Mansfield E. Academic research and innovation. Research Policy. 20:1991;1-12.
20. Mansfield E. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics. 77:1995;55-62.
21. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy. 26:1998;773-776.
22. Martin, B., Salter, A., Hicks, D., Pavitt, K., Senker, J., Scharp, M., Von Tunzelman, N., 1996. The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance. Report for HM Treasury, SPRU, Brighton.
23. Meyer M. Patents citing scientific literature: is the relationship causal or casual? The IPTS Report. 28:1998;11-18.
24. Meyer, M., 1999. Does science push technology?: patents citing scientific literature. To be published in Research Policy.
25. Meyer-Kramer, F., Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 835-851.
26. Narin F., Noma E. Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics. 7:1985;369-381.
27. Narin F., Olivastro D. Status report: linkage between technology and science. Research Policy. 21:1992;237-249.
28. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation. 5:1995;183-187.
29. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy. 26:1997;317-330.
30. Nelson R.R., Wolff E.N. Factors behind cross-industry differences in technological progress. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 8:1997.
31. Niosi J. The internationalization of industrial R&D: from technology transfer to the learning organisation. Research Policy. 28:1999;107-117.
32. Noyons E.C.M., Van Raan A.F.J., Grupp H., Schmoch U. Exploring the science and technology interface: inventor-author relations in laser medicines research. Research Policy. 23:1994;443-457.
33. NSF, 1969. Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science (TRACES). National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
34. OECD, 1994. The measurement of scientific and technological activities: using patents as science and technology indicators. Patent manual CD (4) 114, Paris.
35. OST, 1998. Observatoire de Sciences et des Techniques. Science and Technologie Indicateurs, 1998, OST, Paris.
36. Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1998. National systems of innovation under strain: the internationalisation of corporate R&D. SPRU Electronic working papers series, Paper no. 22, SPRU, University of Sussex.
37. Pavitt K. Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics. 7:1985;77-79.
38. Pavitt K. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy. 27:1998;793-805.
39. Rosenberg N. Jr., Birdzell L. Science, technology and the western miracle. Scientific American. 263(5):1990;42-54.
40. Schmoch U. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics. 26:1993;193-211.
41. Tijssen R.J.W. Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R&D networks: the case of process engineering in the Netherlands. Research Policy. 26:1998;791-809.
42. Tijssen R.J.W., Van Wijk E. In search of the European Paradox: an international comparison of Europe's scientific performance and knowledge flows in information and communications technologies research. Research Policy. 28:1999;519-543.
43. Tijssen R.J.W., Van Leeuwen Th.N., Korevaar J.C. Scientific publication activity of industry in the Netherlands. Research Evaluation. 6:1996;1-15.
44. Tijssen, R.J.W., Van Leeuwen, Th.N., Hollanders, H., Verspagen, B., 1998. Netherlands Observatory of Science and Technology, Science and Technology Indicators 1998 - English summary version. Leiden/Maastricht.
45. Tijssen, R.J.W., Buter, R.K., Van Leeuwen, Th.N., 1999. Technological relevance of a national science base: validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Forthcoming in Scientometrics.
46. Van Vianen B.G., Moed H.F., Van Raan A.F.J. An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy. 19:1990;61-81.
47. Verspagen B. Large firms and knowledge flows in the Dutch R&D system: a case study of Philips Electronics. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 11:1999;211-233.