Universities and industrial transformation: An interpretative and selective literature study with special emphasis on Sweden

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 345-365

  Jacobsson, Staffan ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0036823429     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154302781780831     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anselin, L, A Varga and Z Acs (1997). "Entrepreneurship, geographic spillovers and university research, a spatial econometric approach", Working Paper Series 59, ESRC Centre for Business Research, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
2. Autant-Bernard, C. (2001), "Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case", Research Policy, 30, pages 1069-1078.
3. Behrens, T, and D Gray (2001), "Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome", Research Policy, 30, pages 179-199.
4. Benner, M, and U Sandstrm̈ (2000a), "Inertia and change in Scandinavian public-sector research systems: the case of biotechnology", Science and Public Policy, 27(6), December, pages 443-454.
5. Benner, M, and U Sandström (2000b), "Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system", Research Policy 29, pages 291-301.
6. Bergek, A (2002), Shaping and Exploiting Technological Opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden, PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
7. Blind, K, and H Grupp (1999), "Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences", Research Policy, 28, pages 451-468.
8. Bozeman, B (2000), "Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory", Research Policy, 29, pages 627-655.
9. Carlsson, B (editor) (1997), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).
10. Carlsson, B (editor) (2002), Technological Systems in the Bioindustries. An international study (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).
11. Carlsson, B, and S Jacobsson (1991), "What makes the automation industry strategic?", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(4), pages 257-269.
12. Carlsson, B, and S Jacobsson (1997), "Variety and technology policy - how do technological systems originate and what are the policy conclusions?", in Edquist (1997), pages 266-297,
13. Carlsson, B, and R Stankiewicz (1991), "On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), pages 93-118.
14. Carlsson, B, M Holmén, S Jacobsson, A Rickne and R Stankiewicz (2002), "The analytical approach and methodology", in Carlsson (2002).
15. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (1999), Funding a Revolution. Government support for computing research (National Research Council, National Academy Press, USA).
16. Dasgupta, P, and P A David (1994), "A new economics of science", Research Policy, 23, pages 487-521.
17. Edquist, C (editor) (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (Pinter, London).
18. Edquist, C, and B Johnson (1997), "Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation", in Edquist (1997), pages 41-63.
19. Etzkowitz, H, A Webster, C Gebhardt and B Retta (2000), "The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm", Research Policy, 29, pages 313-330.
20. Faulkner, W, and J Senker (1994), "Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkages in three technologies", Research Policy, 23, pages 673-695.
21. Geuna, A (2001), "The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintened consequences, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXV(3), September, pages 607-632.
22. Godin, B, and Y Gingras (2000), "The place of universities in the system of knowledge production", Research Policy, 29, pages 273-278.
23. Goldfarb, B, and M Henrekson (2002), "Bottom-up vs. top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property", mimeo, Department of Economics Stanford University and Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics
24. Granberg, A (1988), "Fiber optics as a technological field: a case study report", Discussion paper no 182, Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, Sweden,
25. Granberg, A, and R Stankiewicz (1981), "Specialiseringstendenser i den högskolebaserade tekniska forskningen", Discussion paper no 141, March, Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, Sweden.
26. Granberg, A, and R Stankiewicz (2001), "The R&D dynamics of biotechnology, a review", mimeo, Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, Sweden.
27. Henrekson, M, and N Rosenberg (2000), Akademiskt entreprenörskap. Universitet och näringisliv i samverkan (SNS Förlag, Stockholm).
28. Hicks, D, A Breitzman Sr, K Hamilton and F Narin (2000), "Research excellence and patented innovation", Science and Public Policy, 27(5), September, pages 310-320.
29. Hicks, D, T Breitzman, D Olivastro and K Hamilton (2001), "The changing composition of innovative activity in the US - a portrait based on patent analysis", Research Policy, 30, pages 681-703.
30. Holmán, M (2001), Emergence of Regional Actor Systems - Generic Technologies and the Search for Useful and Saleable Applications, PhD Dissertation, Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
31. Hughes, T P (1983), Networks of Power. Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).
32. Jacobsson, S (1986). Electronics and Industrial Policy. The case of computer controlled, World Industry Studies 5 (Allen & Unwin, London).
33. Jacobsson, S (1997), "Sweden's technological system and future development potential - the case of electronics and computer technology", in Carlsson (1997), pages 61-92.
34. Jacobsson, S (2002), "Om konsten att omvandla energisystemet - reflektioner kring 'Handel med certifikat. Ett nytt sätt att främja el från förnybara energikällor, SOU 2001:77', Ekonomisk Debatt, Årgång 30/3.
35. Jacobsson, S, C Sjöberg and M Wahlström (2001), "Alternative specifications of the institutional constraint to economic growth - or why is there a shortage of computer and electronic engineers and scientists in Sweden?", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(2), June, pages 179-193.
36. Jacobsson, S, B Andersson and L Bångens (2002), "Transforming the energy system - the evolution of the German technological system for solar cells", SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series no 84.
37. Johnson, A, and S Jacobsson (2001), "Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden", in R Coombs, K Green, A Richards and W Walsh (editors), Technology and the Market, Demand, Users and Innovation, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Norfolk MA, USA) pages 89-111.
38. Johnson, A, and S Jacobsson (2002), "The development of a growth industry - the wind turbine industry in Germany, Holland and Sweden", forthcoming in S Metcalfe and U Cantner (editors), Transformation and Development: Schumpeterian Perspectives (Physica/Springer, Heidelberg).
39. Kline, S, and N Rosenberg (1986), "An overview of innovation", in R Landau and N Rosenberg (editors), The Positive Sum Strategy: Hamessing Technology for Economic Growth (National Academy Press, Washington DC) pages 275-305.
40. Lattimore, R, and J Revesz (1996), "Australian science: performance from published papers", Bureau of Industry Economics, Report 96/3, Australian Government Printing Office, Canberra.
41. Lindholm-Dahlstrand, A (1999), "Technology-based SMEs in the Göteborg region: their origin and interaction with universities and large firms", Regional Studies, 33(4), pages 379-389.
42. Loasby, B (1998), "The Organisation of capabilities", Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 35, pages 139-160.
43. Lundvall B-A (editor) (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Pinter Publishers, London).
44. McMillan, G, F Narin and D Deeds (2000), "An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology", Research Policy, 29, pages 1-8.
45. Mansfield, E, and J-Y Lee (1996), "The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support", Research Policy, 25, pages 1047-1058.
46. Martin, B, and K Etzkowitz (2000), "The origin and evolution of university species", VEST, 13(3-4), pages 9-34.
47. Metcalfe, S (1992), "The economic foundations of technology policy, equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives", mimeo, University of Manchester.
48. Meyer, M (2000), "Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature", Research Policy, 29, pages 409-434.
49. Meyer-Krahmer, F, and U Schmoch (1998), "Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields", Research Policy, 27, pages 835-851.
50. Myrdal, G (1957), Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (Ducksworth Publishers, London).
51. Narin, F, K S Hamiltcn and O Olivastro (1997), "The increasing linkage between US technology and public science", Research Policy, 21, pages 317-330.
52. Odhnoff, J, and I Hamngren (2002), "Internet och 'responsiveness'", Stencil, IT-Kommissionen, Stockholm.
53. OECD (2000a), Basic Science and Technology Statistics, 1999 edition (OECD, Paris).
54. OECD (2000b), Main Science and Technology Indicators 1999, number 1 (OECD, Paris).
55. Pavitt, K (1991), "What makes basic research economically useful?", Research Policy, 20, pages 109-119.
56. Pavitt, K (1998), "The social shaping of the national science base", Research Policy, 27, pages 793-805.
57. Pavitt, K (2000). "Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased: a radical proposal", Science and Public Policy, 27(6). December, pages 455-460.
58. Pavitt, K (2001), "Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice (And what they should not learn)", Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pages 761-779.
59. Persson, O (2000), "Studying national innovation systems using paper and patents - methods and examples", mimeo, Inforsk, Department of Sociology, Umea University, Sweden.
60. Porter, M (1998), "Clusters and Competition. New agendas for companies, governments and institutions". in M Porter (editor), On Competition (A Harvard Business Review Book, Boston MA) pages 197-287.
61. Rappert, B, A Webster and D Charles (1999), "Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property', Research Policy, 28, pages 873-890.
62. Rickne, A (2000). New Technology-Based Firms and Industrial Dynamics. Evidence from the Technological System of Biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts, PhD Dissertation, Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
63. Rickne, A, and S Jacobsson (1999), "New technology based firms in Sweden. A study of their impact on industrial renewal", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(2), pages 197-223.
64. Rosenberg, N (1996), "Uncertainty and technological change", in R Landau, T Taylor and G Wright (editors), The Mosaic of Economic Growth (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA) pages 334-355.
65. Rosenberg, N (2000), Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives (Routledge, London),
66. Rosenberg, N, and R Nelson (1994), "American universities and technical advance in industry", Research Policy, 23, pages 323-348.
67. Salter, A, and B Martin (2001). "The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review", Research Policy, (30), pages 509-532.
68. Salter, A, P D'Este, B Martin, A Geuna, A Scott, K Pavitt, P Patel and P Nightingale (2000), "Talent, not technology: publicly funded research and innovation in the UK", SPRU, University of Sussex, UK.
69. Saxenian, A-L (1994), 'Regional advantage", Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, ??town of Publication??, USA).
70. SCB (2001), "Forskning och utveckling inom universitets - och högskolesektorn 1999", Stockholm
71. Schmookler, J (1966), Inventions and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and London.
72. Scott, A, G Steyn, A Geuna, S Brusoni and E Steinmuller (2001), "The economic returns to basic research and the benefits of university-industry relationships. A literature review and update of findings, Report for the Office of Science and Technology", mimeo, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK.
73. Sörlin, S, and G Törnqvist (2000), Kunskap for välstånd. Universiteten och omvandlingen av Sverige (SNS Forlag, Stockholm).
74. Tijssen, R W (2002), "Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors", Research Policy, 31(4), pages 509-526.
75. , Scientometrics, 47(2), pages 389-412.
76. Utterback, J (1994), Mastering the dynamics of innovation. How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA).
77. Vinnova (2001), "The Swedish biotechnology innovation system", VINNOVA Innovation in Focus. VF 2001(2), Stockholm.
78. Vinnova (2002), "Effekter av VINNOVAs föregangares stöd till behovsmotiverad forskning", VINNOVA Innovation i Fokus, VF 2002(l), Stockholm.