Rhetorical approaches to scientific writing: An English-Polish contrastive study

Text

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-102

  Golebiowski, Zofia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Contrastive study.; Research paper; Scientific rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010949056     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.1.67     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bazerman, C. (1981). What written knowledge docs: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of Social Sciences 11: 361-387
2. - (1984). Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review 1983-1980. Social Studies in Science 14: 163-196
3. Choi, Y. H. (1988). Text structure of Korean speakers' argumentative essays in English. World Englishes 7 (2): 129-142
4. Clyne, M. G. (1981). Culture and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 61-66
5. - (1983). Contrastive studies of English and German. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 3: 38-49
6. - (1987). Cultural differences in the organisation of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 211-247
7. - (1994). Inter-cultural Communication at Work. Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Clyne, M. and Kreutz, H. (1987). The natural function of 'digression' and other discourse phenomena in German academic writing. Working Papers on Migrant and Intercultural Studies, No. 8. Melbourne: Centre for Migrant and Intercultural Studies, Monash University
9. Čmejrková, S. (1994). Non-native (academic) writing. In Writing vs. Speaking: Language, Text, Discourse, Communication. S. Čmejrková, F. Daneš, and E. Havlová (eds.), 303- 310. Tübingen: Gunter Narr
10. Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics 7: 57-70
11. Day, R. A. (1979). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Philadelphia: ISI Press
12. Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of M.Sc. dissertations. In Talking about Text, M. Coulthard (ed.), 128-145. Birmingham: English Language Research, Birmingham University
13. Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 21:291-313
14. Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1984). Contrastive Linguistics. Prospects and Problems. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
15. - (ed.) (1990). Further Insights into Contrastive Analysis. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins
16. Fredrickson, K. (1996). Investigating genre, discourse community, and researcher skills through multiple methodologies. Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Jyvaskyla, Finland
17. Fredrickson, K. and J. Swales (1994). Competition and discourse community: Introductions from 'Nysvenska studier'. In Text and Talk in Professional Contexts: Selected Papers from the International Conference 'Discourse and Professions', Uppsala, 26-29 August, 1992, B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordbcrg (eds.), Uppsala: Association suedoise de linguistique appliquéc
18. Galtung, J. (1979). Papers on Methodology. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers
19. - (1985). Struktur, Kultur und intellektueller Stil. In Das Fremde und das Eigene, A. Wierlacher (ed.), 151-193. Munich: Iudicium
20. Gajda, S. (1982). Podstawy Badań Stylistycznych nad Jezykiem Naukowym [The Foundations of Stylistic Studies of Scientific Language]. Warsaw: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe
21. Golebiowski, Z. (1995a). Cross-cultural application of Swales' CARS schema. Unpublished paper presented at the Twentieth Australian Congress of Applied Linguistics, Canberra
22. - (1995b). The rhetoric of introductions of research articles written by Polish scholars in English and Polish. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Melbourne
23. - (to appear). Application of Swales' model in the analysis of research papers by Polish authors. International Review of Applied Linguistics
24. Hinds, J. (1983). Linguistics and written discourse in English and Japanese: A contrastive study (1978-1982). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 3: 78-84
25. - (1984). Retention of information using a Japanese style of presentation. Studies in Language 8: 45-69
26. - (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In Writing acrossLanguages: Analysis of L2 text, U. Connor and R. Kaplan (eds.), 141-152. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley
27. Jacoby, S. (1987). References to other researchers in literary research articles. English Language Research Journal 1: 33-78
28. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16 (1-2): 1-20
29. - (1972). Also in Readings on English as a Second Language, K. Croft (ed.), 246-262. Cambridge: Winthrop
30. Kaplan, R. B., d'Anglajan, P., Cowan, J. R., Kachru, B. B., and Tuckec, G. R. (eds.) (1983). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 3 (special issue)
31. Kirkpatrick, A. (1997). Writing expository essays in Chinese: Chinese or Western influences? In Academic Communication across Cultures and Disciplines, Z. Golebiowski and H. Borland (cds.), 140-156. Melbourne: Victoria University
32. Krzeszowski, T. (1984). Tertium comparationis. In Contrastive Linguistics, Prospects and Problems. J, Fisiak (ed.), 301-312. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
33. - (1990). Contrasting Languages. The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
34. Liddicoat, A. (1997). Texts of the culture and texts of the discourse community. In Academic Communication across Cultures and Disciplines, Z. Golebiowski and H. Borland (eds.), 38-41. Melbourne: Victoria University
35. Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th Systemic International Systemic Congress. J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (eds.), 248-274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
36. Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China. College English 47 (8): 789-808
37. Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12 (1): 3-22
38. McCagg, P. (1996). If you can lead a horse to water, you don't have to make it drink: Some comments on reader and writer responsibilities. Multilingua 15 (3): 239-256
39. Melander, B. (1996). Culture or genre? Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Jyváskylá, Finland, 4-9 August
40. Mikolajczak, S. (1990). Skladnia Tekstów Naukowych [The Syntax of Scientific Texts]. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM
41. Mohan, B. A. and Lo, W. A.-Y. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly 19 (3): 515-534
42. Nichols, J. (1988). Nominalisation and assertion in scientific Russian prose. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, J. Haiman and S. Thompson (eds.), 399-428. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
43. Nystrand, M. (1986). The Structure of Written Communication.Orlando, FL: Academic Press
44. Ostler, S. E. (1987). English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text, U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 165-185. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
45. Purves, A. C. (ed.) (1988). Writing across Languages and Cultures: Issues in Contrastive Rhetoric. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
46. Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly 19 (2): 229-258
47. Reppen, R. and Grabe, W. (1993). Spanish transfer effects in the English writing of elementary school children. Lenguas Modernas 20: 113-128
48. St John, M. J. (1987). Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes 6: 113-120
49. Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Aston ESP Research Report No. 1. Birmingham: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston
50. - (1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing. In Common Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies. R. Williams, J. Swales and J. Kirkman (eds.), 77-86. Oxford: Pergamon Press
51. - (1988). 20 years of the TESOL Quarterly. TESOL Quarterly 22: 151-163
52. - (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
53. Swales, J. and Mustafa, H. (eds.) (1984). English for specific purposes in the Arab world. Birmingham: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston
54. Swales, J. and Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication 4: 175-192
55. Taylor, G. and Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics 12 (3): 319-336
56. Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1996). Explicitness vs. implicitness of argumentation: An intercultural comparison. Multilingua 15 (3): 257-274
57. Ventola, E. and Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles. In Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses, E. Ventola (ed.), 457-492. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
58. Wierzbicka, A. and Wierzbicki, P. (1969). Praktyczna Stylistyka [Practical Stylistics]. Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna
59. Yli-Jokipii, H. (1996). An approach to contrasting languages and cultures in the corporate context: Finnish, British, and American business letters and telefax messages. Multilingua 15 (3): 305-328