The explicit signaling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework

Text

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 545-585

  Moreno, Ana I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic discourse; Cohesive devices; Contrastive analysis; Hedging; Premise conclusion sequences

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010948827     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.545     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Becka, J. V. (1978). Application of quantitative methods in contrastive stylistics. Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics 6: 83-92
2. Blank, M., Siegel, P. and Rigsby, J. (1991). Determinants of international CPA firm orientation among accounting students. The British Accounting Review 23 (4): 281-300
3. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
4. Clyne, M. (1981). Culture and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 61-66
5. Connor, U. (1987). Argumentative patterns in students essays. In Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 texts, U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 57-71. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
6. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing. Written Communication 10 (1): 39-71
7. Crombie, W. (1985). Process and Relation in Discourse and Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 16 (4): 271-287
9. van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context. Longman: New York
10. van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press
11. Fisiak, J. (1981). Some introductory notes concerning Contrastive Linguistics. In Contrastive Linguistics and the Language Teacher, J. Fisiak (ed.), 1-11. Oxford: Pergamon Press
12. Gabszewick, J., Pepall, L. and Thisse, J. (1992). Sequential entry with brand loyalty caused by consumer learning-by-using. The Journal of Industrial Economics 40 (4): 397-417
13. Golebiowski, Z. (1998). Rhetorical approaches to scientific writing: English-Polish contrastive study. Text 18 (1): 67-102
14. Grabe, W. (1987). Contrastive rhetoric and text type research. In Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 texts, U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 115-138. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. New York: Elsevier Holland
16. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English [English Language series, 9.] London: Longman
17. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 texts, U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 141-152. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
18. Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67-90
19. Hyde, J. (1990). Aspects of discourse analysis: The explicit signalling of intersentential relations in English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Salamanca. Salamanca
20. Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 239-256
21. - (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text 18 (3): 349-382
22. Hymes, D. (1964). Towards ethnographies of communication: the analysis of communicative events. In Language and Social Context, P. P. Giglioli (ed.), 21-44. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
23. Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural communication. Language Learning 16: 1-20
24. Krzeszwoski, P. T. (1981). Quantitative contrastive analysis. Studia Linguistica 35: 102-13
25. Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly 25 (1): 123-139
26. López, G. (1982). Article introductions in Spanish: A study in Comparative Rhetorics. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Aston, Aston
27. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols. 1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
28. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57-90
29. - (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243-281
30. Mauranen, A. (1993a). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12: 3-22
31. - (1993b). Cultural differences in academic discourse-problems of a linguistic and cultural minority. In The Competent Intercultural Communicator. AFinLA Yearbook 1993, L. Löfman and L. Kurki-Suonio and S. Pellinen and J. Lehtonen (eds.), 157-174. Finland: Publications de L' Association Finlandaise de Linguistique Appliquée No. 51
32. Moreno, A. I. (1995). Estudio contrastivo inglés-español de la expresión de las relaciones de coherencia causal interoracional: El artículo académico sobre economia y empresa. Published Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de León, Leon
33. - (1997). Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs. English for Specific Purposes 16 (3): 161-179
34. Morrow, P. R. (1989). Conjunct use in business news stories and academic journal articles: A comparative study. English for Specific Purposes 8: 239-254
35. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10: 1-35
36. Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital disadvantage: America's failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review 70 (5): 65-82
37. Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367-381
38. Reid, J. (1988). Quantitative differences in English prose written by Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and English students. Unpublished Ph.D., Colorado State University
39. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13: 149-170
40. Santana-Seda, O. (1974) A contrastive study in rhetoric: An analysis of the organization of English and Spanish paragraphs written by native speakers of each language. Published dissertation. New York University. New York
41. Sanders, T. J .M., Spooren, W. P .M. and Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15: 1-35
42. - (1993). Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4 (2): 93-133
43. Sinclair, J. M. (1993). Written discourse structure. In Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse, a Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard, J. M. Sinclair, M. Hoey, and G. Fox (eds.), 6-31. London: Routledge
44. Skelton, J. (1988). Comments in academic articles. Applied Linguistics in Society. London: CILT/BAAL
45. Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: The University of Aston, Languages Studies Unit
46. - (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
47. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36: 82-93
48. Warfield, T. D. and Linsmeier, T. J. (1992). Tax planning, earnings management, and the differential information content of bank earnings components. The Accounting Review 67 (3): 546-562
49. Werlich, E. (1976). A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer
50. Widdowson, H. (1979). Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press