In search of fairness: An application of multi-reviewer anonymous peer review in a large class

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 183-192

  Robinson, Jennifer M ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001752444     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098770220129451     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. BARON, D., 1998. When Professors Get A's and Machines Get Fs. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45: A56
2. ERNST, E., and RESCH, K.L., 1994. Reviewer Bias--a Blinded Experimental Study. Journal of Laboratory & Clinical Medicine, 124: 178–182.
3. ESPERE. 2000. “ The ESPERE Project-Home Page: ESPERE Project ”. http://www.espere.org. Accessed 15/12/2000
4. GOLDMAN, R.L., 1994. The Reliability of Peer Assessments--a Meta-Analysis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 17: 3–21.
5. HOWARD, L., and WILKINSON, G., 1998. Peer Review and Editorial Decision-Making. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173: 110–113.
6. MITCHELL, L.C., 1998. Inflation Isn't the Only Thing Wrong with Grading. Chronicle of Higher Education,: A72
7. MURPHY, T. M., and UTTS, J.M., 1994. A Retrospective Analysis of Peer Review At Physiologia Plantarum. Physiologia Plantarum, 92: 535–542.
8. O'CONNOR, R.J., 1996. Rethinking the Role of Peer Reviewers (Letter). Chronicle of Higher Education,: B3
9. PRIORY. 1999. “ Medicine, Psychiatry, Dentistry, and Veterinary Journals, Priory Lodge Education ”.
10. ROBINSON, J.M., 1999. “ Computer assisted peer review ”. In Computer Assisted Assessment in Higher Education, Edited by: Brown, S., Race, P., and Bull, J., London: Kogan Page.