Setting the stage for developing pre-service teachers’ conceptions of good science teaching: The role of classroom videos

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-24

  Ling Wong, Siu ^a   Ling Wong, Benny Hin ^a   Cheng, Man Wai ^a   Lam, Kwok Leung ^a   Hodson, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344477012     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690500239805     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 153-166.
2. Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491-510.
3. Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10: Using video in teacher education (pp. 103-129). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Anderson, R. D. (1997). The science methods course in the context of the total teacher education experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 269-282.
5. Atkins, S. L. (1998). Windows of opportunity. Preservice teachers perceptions of technology-based alternatives to field experiences. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, 95-105.
6. Barone, T., Berliner, D. C., Blanchard, J., Casanova, U., & McGowan, T. (1996). A future for teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 1108-1149). New York: Macmillan.
7. Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., & Pedretti, E. (2001). Multi-media case methods in pre-service science education: Enabling an apprenticehip for praxis. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 191-209.
8. Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Yoon, S., Perris, K., & van Oostveen, R. (2003). Sciencespecialist student-teachers consider promoting technological design projects: Contributions of multi-media case methods. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 163-187.
9. Black, P., & J. M. Atkin (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
10. Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Smith, D. J. H., McCrindle, A. R., Burnett, P. C., & Campbell, K. J. (2001). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. Learning and Instructions, 11, 35-51.
11. Broadfoot, P. (1992). Teaching and the challenge of change: Educational research in relation to teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 15(1-2), 45-52.
12. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10: Using video in teacher education. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 121-139.
14. Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
15. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12, 18.
16. Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation. Contributions of research on teaching thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5-12.
17. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Inquiry and outcomes: Learning to teach in the age of accountability. Teacher Education Practice, 15(4), 12-34.
18. Colburn, A., & Tillotson, J. W. (1998). A case study for use in science methods courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 153-164.
19. Copeland, W., & Decker, D. (1996). Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(5), 467-481.
20. Crooks, C., & Gifford, V. D. (1992). A comparison of videotaped teaching models and the lecture technique in increasing the use of questioning strategies presented in elementary science lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(3), 76-78.
21. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tigerghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
22. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
23. Gao, L. B., & Watkins, D. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: Identification and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 61-79.
24. Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20-33.
25. Greenwood, G. E., & Parkay, F. W. (1989). Case studies for teacher decision making. New York: Random House.
26. Gunstone, R. F., Slattery, M., Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (1993). A case study exploration of development in preservice science teachers. Science Education, 77, 47-73.
27. Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-214.
28. Hattfield. M. M. (1996). Using multimedia in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 223-228.
29. Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B. D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases. promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483-500.
30. Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383-396.
31. Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541-553.
32. Hoy, A. W., & Murphy, P. K. (2001). Teaching educational psychology to the implicit mind. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 145-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255-275.
34. Koballa, T., & Tippens, D. (2000). Cases in middle and secondary science education: The promise and dilemmas. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
35. Koballa, T., & Tippens, D. (2004). Cases in middle and secondary science education: The promise and dilemmas (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
36. Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
37. Kowalski, T. J., Weaver, R. A., & Henson, K. T. (1990). Case studies on teaching. New York: Longman.
38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Levin, B. B. (1995) Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63-79.
40. Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1996). Quality in the classroom: Learning about teaching through case studies. Rydalmere, NSW: Hodder.
41. Marx, R., Blumefeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). New technologies for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 33-52.
42. Merseth, K. K. (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243-249.
43. Munby, H., Cunningham, M., & Lock, C. (2000). School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84(2), 193-211.
44. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Auckland: Heinemann.
45. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception. Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
46. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
47. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1223-1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Putman, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
49. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counter resistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589-622.
50. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Roth, W.-M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, B. (1999). Becoming-in-the classroom: A case study of teacher development through coteaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(7), 771-784.
52. Rubba, P. A. (1992). The learning cycle as a model for the design of science teacher preservice and inservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(4), 97-101.
53. Sanger, J. (1990). Awakening a scream of consciousness: The critical group in action research. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 174-178.
54. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
55. Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10: Using video in teacher education (pp. 259-286). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163-183.
57. Silverman, R., Welty, W. M., & Lyon, S. (1996). Case studies for teacher problem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Skamp, K. (1995). Student teachers’ conceptions of how to recognise a “good” primary science teacher. Does two years in a teacher education program make a difference? Research in Science Education, 25(4), 395-429.
59. Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82
60. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1989). Case studies of exemplary science and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 89(4), 320-334.
61. van den Berg, E. (2001). An exploration of the use of multimedia cases as a reflective tool in teacher education. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 245-265.
62. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24, 173-210
63. Yung, B. H. W., Wong, S. L., & Cheng, M. W. (2003). A curriculum innovation. Focusing on student teachers’ developing conceptions of good science teaching. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2). Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/
64. Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1990). Teacher socialization. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 320-347). New York: Macmillan.