Phylogenetic relationships in Fagales based on DNA sequences from three genomes

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 165, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 311-324

  Li, Rui Qi ^a   Chen, Zhi Duan ^a   Lu, An Ming ^a   Soltis, Douglas E ^b   Soltis, Pamela S ^c   Manos, Paul S ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Combined analysis; Congruence analysis; Fagales; Multiple DNA sequences; Phylogeny; Three genomes

Indexed keywords

GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

BETULACEAE; CASUARINACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; FAGACEAE; FAGALES; JUGLANDACEAE; MYRICACEAE; NOTHOFAGUS; RHOIPTELEACEAE; TICODENDRACEAE;

EID: 2942755894     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/381920     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Abbe EC 1974 Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentiferae." Bot Rev 40:159-261.
2. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) 1998 An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:531-553.
3. _ 2003 An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-436.
4. Baker RH, R DeSalle 1997 Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst Biol 46:654-673.
5. Behnke H-D 1989 Sieve-element plastids, phloem proteins, and the evolution of flowering plants. IV. Hamamelidae. Pages 105-128 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelidae." Clarendon, Oxford.
6. _ 1991 Sieve-element characters of Ticodendron. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:131-134.
7. Bousquet J, L Simon, M Lalonde 1990 DNA amplification from vegetative and sexual tissues of trees using polymerase chain reaction. Can J For Res 20:254-257.
8. Bousquet J, SH Strauss, P Li 1992 Complete congruence between morphological and rbcL-based molecular phylogenies in birches and related species (Betulaceae). Mol Biol Evol 9:1076-1088.
9. Bremer B, K Bremer, N Heidari, P Erixon, RG Olmstead, AA Anderberg, M Källersjö, E Barkhordarian 2002 Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Mol Phylogenet Evol 24:274-301.
10. Bremer B, RK Jansen, B Oxelman, M Backlund, H Lantz, K-J Kim 1999 More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst Biol 48:413-435.
11. Carlquist S 1991 Wood and bark anatomy of Ticodendron: comments on relationship. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:96-104.
12. Chase MW, DE Soltis, RG Olmstead, D Morgan, DH Les, BD Mishler, MR Duvall, et al 1993 Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:528-580.
13. Chen ZD 1994 Phylogeny and phytogeography of the Betulaceae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 32:1-31, 101-153.
14. Chen ZD, SR Manchester, HY Sun 1999 Phylogeny and evolution of the Betulaceae as inferred from DNA sequences, morphology, and paleobotany. Am J Bot 86:1168-1181.
15. Chen ZD, XQ Wang, HY Sun, Y Han, ZX Zhang, YP Zou, AM Lu 1998 Systematic position of the Rhoipteleaceae: evidence from nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 36:1-7.
16. Conti EK, KJ Sytsma, WS Alversion 1994 Neither oak nor alder, but nearly: the relationships of Ticodendron based on rbcL sequences. Abstract. Am J Bot 81:149.
17. Crane PR 1989 Early fossil history and evoution of the Betulaceae. Pages 87-116 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelididae." Clarendon, Oxford.
18. Crane PR, S Blackmore 1989 Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 1. Introduction and "lower" Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher" Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
19. Crepet WL, CP Daghlian 1980 Castaneoid inflorescences from the Middle Eocene of Tennessee and the diagnostic value of pollen (at the subfamily level) in the Fagaceae. Am J Bot 67:739-756.
20. Crepet WL, KC Nixon 1989 Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Am J Bot 76:842-855.
21. Cronquist A 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
22. _ 1988 The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
23. Cunningham CW 1997 Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol Biol Evol 14:733-740.
24. Dahlgren G 1989 The last Dahlgrenogram: system of classification of the dicotyledons. Pages 249-260 in K Tan, ed. Plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
25. Dahlgren R 1983 General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord J Bot 3:119-149.
26. Doyle JJ 1992 Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst Bot 17:144-163.
27. Farris JS, M Källersjö, AG Kluge, C Bult 1994 Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
28. Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogeny: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
29. Feuer S 1991 Pollen morphology and the systematic relationships of Ticodendron incognitum. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:143-151.
30. Friis EM 1983 Upper Cretaceous (Senonian) floral structures of juglandalean affinity containing Normapolles pollen. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 39:161-188.
31. Furlow JJ 1990 The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 71:1-67.
32. Giannasi DE 1986 Phytochemical aspects of phylogeny in Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:417-437.
33. Gielly L, P Taberlet 1996 A phylogeny of the European gentians inferred from chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 120:57-75.
34. GPWG (Grass Phylogeny Working Group) 2001 Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard 88:373-428.
35. Herendeen PS, PR Crane, AN Drinnan 1995 Fagaceous flowers, fruits, and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. Int J Plant Sci 156:93-116.
36. Hickey LJ, DW Taylor 1991 The leaf architecture of Ticodendron and the application of foliar characters in discerning its relationships. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:105-130.
37. Hills DM 1987 Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:23-42.
38. Hoot SB, A Culham, PR Crane 1995 The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:194-207.
39. Huelsenbeck JP, FR Ronquist 2001 MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
40. Hufford L 1992 Rosidae and their relationships to other non-magnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann Mo Bot Gard 79:218-248.
41. Johnson LA, DE Soltis 1995 Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:149-171.
42. Johnson LAS, KL Wilson 1989 Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of Hamamelidae. Pages 167-188 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelididae." Clarendon, Oxford.
43. Jones JH 1986 Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:228-275.
44. Jury SL 1978 Betulaceae. Pages 59-60 in VH Heywood, ed. Flowering plants of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. Kato H, K Oginuma, Z Gu, B Hammel, H Tobe 1998 Phylogenetic relationships of Betulaceae based on matK sequences with particular reference to the position of Ostryopsis. Acta Phytotaxon Geobot 49:89-97.
46. Kubitzki K 1993 Fagaceae. Pages 301-309 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol 2. Springer, Berlin.
47. Kuprianova AL 1962 Palynological data and the systematics of the Fagales and Urticales. Pages 17-25 in Soviet Reports from the First International Palynological Conference. U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
48. Lanyon SM 1993 Phylogenetic frameworks: towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol J Linn Soc 49:45-61.
49. Li RQ, ZD Chen, YP Hong, AM Lu 2002 Phylogenetic relationships of the "higher" hamamelids based on chloroplast trnL-F sequences. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 44:1462-1468.
50. Loconte H 1996 Comparison of alternative hypotheses for the origin of the angiosperms. Pages 267-285 in DW Taylor, LJ Hickey, eds. Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny. Chapman & Hall, New York.
51. Lu AM 1982 On the phytogeography of the Juglandaceae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 20:257-271.
52. MacDonald AD 1989 The morphology and relationships of the Myricaceae. Pages 147-165 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelidae." Clarendon, Oxford.
53. Manning WE 1938 The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. I. The inflorescence. Am J Bot 25:407-419.
54. _ 1978 The classification within the Juglandaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 65:1058-1087.
55. Manos PS, KC Nixon, JJ Doyle 1993 Cladistic analysis of restriction site variation within the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat region of selected Hamamelididae. Syst Bot 18:551-562.
56. Manos PS, KP Steele 1997 Phylogenetic analyses of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. Am J Bot 84:1407-1419.
57. Manos PS, DE Stone 2001 Evolution, phylogeny and systematics of the Juglandaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 88:231-269.
58. Manos PS, ZK Zhou, CH Cannon 2001 Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. Int J Plant Sci 162:1361-1379.
59. McDade LA, ML Moody 1999 Phylogenetic relationships among Acanthaceae: evidence from noncoding trnL-trnF chloroplast DNA sequence. Am J Bot 86:70-80.
60. Meurer-Grimes B 1995 New evidence for the systematic significance of acylated spermidines and flavonoids in pollen of Higher Hamamelidae. Brittonia 47:130-142.
61. Miyamoto MM 1985 Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1:186-189.
62. Molvray M, PJ Kores, MW Chase 1999 Phylogenetic relationships within Korthalsella (Viscaceae) based on nuclear ITS and plastid trnL-F sequence data. Am J Bot 86:249-260.
63. Nickrent DL, DE Soltis 1995 A comparison of angiosperm phylogenies from nuclear 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:208-234.
64. Nixon KC 1982 In support of the Nothofagaceae Kuprianova. Am J Bot 162:102 (Abstract).
65. _ 1989 Origins of Fagaceae. Pages 23-43 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelidae." Clarendon, Oxford.
66. Nixon KC, WL Crepet 1989 Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae): taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships. Am J Bot 76:828-841.
67. Nixon KC, QD Wheeler 1992 Extinction and the origin of species. Pages 119-143 in MJ Novacek, QD Wheeler, eds. Extinction and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.
68. Oginuma K, JZ Gu, ZS Yue 1995 Karyomorphology of Rhoiptelea (Rhoipteleaceae). Acta Phytotaxon Geobot 46:147-151.
69. Oginuma K, H Tobe 1992 Karyomorphology of Juglandaceae. Pages 171-179 in R Tanaka, ed. Plant chromosome research. International Academic, Beijing.
70. Peterson FP 1985 A serotaxonomic appraisal of the "Amentiferae. " Bull Torrey Bot Club 112:43-52.
71. Peterson FP, DE Fairbrothers 1979 Serological investigation of selected amentiferous taxa. Syst Bot 4:233-241.
72. Posada D, KA Crandall 1998 Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
73. Qiu YL, MW Chase, SB Hoot, F Conti, PR Crane, KJ Sytsma, CR Parks 1998 Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Int J Plant Sci 159:891-905.
74. Qiu YL, J Lee, F Bernasconi-Quadroni, DE Soltis, PS Soltis, M Zanis, EA Zimmer, et al 2000 Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int J Plant Sci 161(suppl):S3-S27.
75. Rendle AB 1925 The classification of flowering plants. Vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
76. Richardson JE, MF Fay, QCB Cronk, D Bowman, MW Chase 2000 A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am J Bot 87:1304-1324.
77. Ritland K, MT Clegg 1987 Evolutionary analysis of plant DNA sequences. Am Nat 130(suppl):S74-S100.
78. Savolainen V, MW Chase, SB Hoot, CM Morton, DE Soltis, C Bayer, MF Fay, et al 2000a Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst Biol 49:306-362.
79. Savolainen V, MF Fay, DC Albach, A Backlund, M Bank, KM Cameron, SA Johnson, et al 2000b Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull 55:257-309.
80. Seelanan TS, A Schnabel, JF Sendel 1997 Congruence and consensus in the Cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Syst Bot 22:259-290.
81. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, MW Chase, ME Mort, DC Albach, M Zanis, V Savolainen, et al 2000 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381-461.
82. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, JJ Doyle 1998 Molecular systematics of plants. II. DNA sequencing. Kluwer Academic, Boston.
83. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, DR Morgan, SM Swenson, GC Mullin, JM Dowd, PG Martin 1995 Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2647-2651.
84. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, DL Nickrent, LA Johnson, WH Hahn, SB Hoot, JA Sweere, et al 1997 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 84:1-49.
85. Sullivan J 1996 Combining data with different distributions of among-site variation. Syst Biol 45:375-380.
86. Suzuki Y, GV Glazko, M Nei 2002 Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16138-161423.
87. Swofford DL 2000 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b4a. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
88. Taberlet P, L Gielly, G Pautou, J Bouvet 1991 Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105-1109.
89. Takhtajan A 1980 Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot Rev 46:225-359.
90. _ 1997 Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
91. Thompson JD, TJ Gibson, F Plewniak, F Jeanmougin, DG Higgins 1997 The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876-4882.
92. Thorne RF 1973 The "Amentiferae" or Hamamelidae as an artificial group: a summary statement. Brittonia 25:395-405.
93. _ 1983 Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nord J Bot 3:85-117.
94. _ 1992 Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot Rev 58:225-348.
95. Tobe H 1991 Reproduction, morphology, anatomy, and relationship of Ticodendron. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:135-142.
96. Troitsky AV, YF Melekhovets, GM Rakhimova, VK Bobrova 1991 Angiosperm origin and early stages of seed plant evolution deduced from rRNA sequence comparison. J Mol Evol 32:253-261.
97. Walker JW, JA Doyle 1975 The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:664-723.
98. Walker JW, AG Walker 1984 Ultrastructure of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and the origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 71:464-521.
99. Wang XR, Y Tsumura, H Yoshimaru, K Nagasaka, AE Szmidt 1999 Phylogenetic relationships of Eurasian pines (Pinus, Pinaceae) based on chloroplast rbcL, matK, rpL20-rpS18 spacer, and trnV intron sequences. Am J Bot 86:1742-1753.
100. Whitten WM, NH Williams, MW Chase 2000 Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence. Am J Bot 87:1842-1856.
101. Winkler H 1904 Betulaceae. Pages 1-149 in A Engler, ed. Das Pflanzenreich. 19 (IV.6.). Engelmann, Leipzig.
102. Withner CL 1941 Stern anatomy and phylogeny of the Rhoipteleaceae. Am J Bot 28:872-878.
103. Wolfe JA 1989 Leaf-architecture analysis of the Hamamelidae. Pages 75-104 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher Hamamelidae." Clarendon, Oxford.
104. Wolfe KH 1991 Protein-coding genes in chloroplast DNA: compilation of nucleotide sequences, data base entries and rates of molecular evolution. Pages 467-468 in K Vasil, ed. Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Vol 7BI. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
105. Yoder AD, JA Irwin, BA Payseur 2001 Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst Biol 50:408-424.
106. Zavada MS, DL Dilcher 1986 Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:348-381.
107. Zhang WH, ZD Chen, JH Li, HB Chen, YC Tang 2003 Phylogeny of the Dipsacales s.l. based on chloroplast trnL-F and ndhf sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26:176-189.
108. Zhou RH, ZH Jiang 1990 Chemical constituents of the Hamamelidae and their systematic significance. Cathaya 2:63-76.
109. Zomlefer WB, NH Williams, WM Whitten, WS Judd 2001 Generic circumscription and relationships in the tribe Melanthieae (Liliales, Melanthiaceae), with emphasis on Zigadenus: evidence from ITS and trnL-F sequences data. Am J Bot 88:1655-1669.