Phylogenetic analyses of 'higher' Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1407-1419

  Manos, Paul S ^b   Steele, Kelly P ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

'Higher' hamamelids; CpDNA; Fagaceae; Hamamelididae; MatK; Nothofagus; rbcL

Indexed keywords

BETULACEAE; CASUARINA; FAGACEAE; FAGUS; HAMAMELIDIDAE; JUGLANDACEAE; MYRICACEAE; NOTHOFAGACEAE; NOTHOFAGUS; RHOIPTELEA; TICODENDRON;

EID: 0030776232     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2446139     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. ABBE, E. C. 1974. Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentiferae." Botanical Review 40: 159-261.
2. ALBERT, V. A., S. E. WILLIAMS, AND M. W. CHASE. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491-1495.
3. BATTEN, D. J. 1989. Systematic relationships between Normapolles pollen and the Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 9-21. Clarendon, Oxford.
4. BEHNKE, H.-D. 1991. Sieve-element characters of Ticodendron. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 131-134.
5. BERRIDGE, E. M. 1914. The structure of the flower of Fagaceae, and its bearing on the affinities of the group. Annals of Botany 28: 509-526.
6. BOUSQUET, J., S. H. STRAUSS, AND P. LI. 1992. Complete congruence between morphological and rbcL-based molecular phylogenies in birches and related species (Betulaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 1076-1088.
7. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
8. BRETT, D. W. 1964. The inflorescence of Fagus and Castanea, and the evolution of the cupules of the Fagaceae. New Phytologist 63: 96-118.
9. CARLQUIST, S. 1991. Wood and bark anatomy of Ticodendron: comments on relationship. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 96-104.
10. CHASE, M. W., et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
11. CHMURA, C. A. 1973. Upper Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian) angiosperm pollen from the western San Joaquin Valley, California, U.S.A. Palaeontographica B 141: 89-171.
12. CONTI, E., K. J. SYTSMA, AND W. S. ALVERSON. 1994. Neither oak nor alder, but nearly: the relationships of Ticodendron based on rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 81: 149 (Abstract).
13. CRACRAFT, J., AND K. HELM-BYCHOWSKI. 1991. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: Some methodological strategies. In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft [eds.], Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, 184-220. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. CRANE, P. R. 1989. Early fossil history and evolution of the Betulaceae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 87-116. Clarendon, Oxford.
15. _, AND S. BLACKMORE. 1989. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
16. CREPET, W. L. 1989. History and implications of the early North American fossil record of Fagaceae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 45-66. Clarendon, Oxford.
17. _, AND C. P. DAGHLIAN. 1980. Castaneoid inflorescences from the Middle Eocene of Tennessee and the diagnostic value of pollen (at the subfamily level) in the Fagaceae. American Journal of Botany 67: 739-756.
18. _, AND K. C. NIXON. 1987. Tricolporate angiosperms: success, phylogeny and early radiation. XIV International Botanical Congress (Berlin), p. 284 (Abstract).
19. _, AND _. 1989a. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 76: 842-855.
20. _, AND _. 1989b. Extinct transitional Fagaceae from the Oligocene and their phylogenetic implications, American Journal of Botany 76: 1493-1505.
21. _, _, E. M. FRIIS, AND J. V. FREUDENSTEIN. 1992. Oldest fossil flowers of hamamelidaceous affinity, from the Late Cretaceous of New Jersey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89: 8986-8989.
22. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
23. _. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
24. DAHLGREN, G. 1989. The last Dahlgrenogram - System of classification of the dicotyledons. In K. Tan [ed.], The Davis and Hedge Festschrift: plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects, 249-260. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
25. DAHLGREN, R. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91-124.
26. DAVIS, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure for the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Systematic Botany 20: 503-527.
27. DETTMANN, M. E., D. T. POCKNALL, E. J. ROMERO, AND M. C. ZAMALOA. 1990. Nothofagidites Erdtman ex Potonie, 1960: A catalogue of species with notes on the paleogeographic distribution of Nothofagus Bl. (Southern Beech). New Zealand Geological Survey, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
28. DICKISON, W. C. 1989. Comparisons of the primitive Rosidae and Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, Introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, 47-73. Clarendon, Oxford.
29. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
30. DOYLE, J. A., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1993. Phylogenies and angiosperm diversification. Paleobiology 19(2): 141-167.
31. EAMES, A. J. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
32. EHRENDORFER, F. 1977. New ideas about the early differentiation of angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution, Supplement 1: 227-234.
33. _. 1989. The phylogenetic position of the Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, Introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, 1-8. Clarendon, Oxford.
34. ENDRESS, P. K. 1977. Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales group. Plant Systematics and Evolution, Supplement 1: 321-347.
35. ENGLER, A., AND K. PRANTL. 1887-1915. Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
36. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
37. FEUER, S. 1991. Pollen morphology and the systematic relationships of Ticodendron incognitum. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 143-151.
38. FEY, B. S., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1983. Development and morphological interpretations of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173: 431-468.
39. FORMAN, L. L. 1966. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bulletin 18: 385-419.
40. FRASCARIA, N., L. MAGGIA, M. MICHAUD, AND J. BOUSQUET. 1993. The rbcL gene sequence from chestnut indicates a slow rate of evolution in the Fagaceae. Genome 36: 668-671.
41. FRIIS, E. M. 1983. Upper Cretaceous (Senonian) floral structures of Juglandalean affinity containing Normapolles pollen. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 39: 161-188.
42. _, AND P. R. CRANE. 1989. Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Hamamelidae. In P.R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and the fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, Introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, 155-174. Clarendon, Oxford.
43. GUILLAUMIN, A. 1940. Materiaux pour la flore de la Nouvelle-Caledonie. LVII. La presence d'une Myricacee. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 87: 299-300.
44. GUNTER, L. E., G. KOCHERT, AND D. E. GIANNASI. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the Juglandaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 192: 11-29.
45. HERENDEEN, P. S., P. R. CRANE, AND A. N. DRINNAN. 1995. Fagaceous flowers, fruits, and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 93-116.
46. HICKEY, L. J., AND J. A. WOLFE. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 538-589.
47. _, AND J. A. DOYLE. 1977. Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution. Botanical Review 43: 3-104.
48. _, AND D. W. TAYLOR. 1991. The leaf architecture of Ticodendron and the application of foliar characters in discerning its relationships. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 105-130.
49. HILL, R. S., AND G. J. JORDAN. 1993. The evolutionary history of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 6: 111-126.
50. HILLIS, D. M., AND M. T. DIXON. 1989. Vertebrate phylogeny: evidence from 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. In B. Fernholm, K. Bremer, and H. Jornvall [eds.], The hierarchy of life, 355-367. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
51. HJELMQVIST, H. 1948. Studies on the floral morphology of the Amentiferae. Botanisker Notiser, Supplement 2: 77-121.
52. _. 1963. Some notes on Nothofagus from New Guinea and New Caledonia. Botaniska Notiser 116: 225-237.
53. HUFFORD, L. 1992. Rosidae and their relationship to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 218-248.
54. JOHNSON, L. A. S., AND K. L. WILSON. 1993. Casuarinaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 237-242. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
55. JONES, J. H. 1986. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 228-275.
56. KAUL, R. B., AND E. C. ABBE. 1984. Inflorescence architecture and evolution in the Fagaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 65: 375-401.
57. KEDVES, M. 1989. Evolution of the Normapolles complex. In P.R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 1-7. Clarendon, Oxford.
58. KELLOGG, E. A., AND N. D. JULIANO. 1997. The structure and function of rubisco and their implications for systematic studies. American Journal of Botany 84: 413-428.
59. KERSHAW, A. P. 1970. Pollen morphological variation within the Casuarinaceae. Pollen et Spores 12: 145-161.
60. KIM, K. J., R. K. JANSEN, R. S. WALLACE, H. J. MICHAELS, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL sequence variation in the Asteraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 428-445.
61. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLFE. 1993. Cladistics: what's in a word. Cladistics 9: 183-199.
62. KUBITZKI, K. 1993a. Fagaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 301-309. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
63. _. 1993b. Myricaccae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 453-456. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
64. KUPRIANOVA, A. L. 1962. Palynological data and the systematics of the Fagales and Urticales. In Soviet Reports from the First International Palynological Conference, 17-25. U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
65. LANGDON, L. M. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. Botanical Gazette 101: 301-327.
66. _. 1947. The comparative morphology of the Fagaceae. I. The genus Nothofagus. Botanical Gazette 108: 350-371.
67. LI, W.-H., C. I. WU, AND C.-C. LUO. 1985. A new method of estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2: 150-174.
68. LOCONTE, H. 1996. Comparison of alternative hypotheses for the origin of the angiosperms. In D. W. Taylor and L. J. Hickey [eds.] Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny, 267-285. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
69. MACDONALD, A. D. 1979. Inception of the cupule of Quercus macrocarpa and Fagus grandifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1777-1782.
70. _. 1989. The morphology and relationships of the Myricaceae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 147-166. Clarendon, Oxford.
71. MANNING, W. E. 1938. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. I. The inflorescence. American Journal of Botany 25: 407-419.
72. _. 1940. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. II. The pistillate flowers and fruit. American Journal of Botany 27: 839-852.
73. MANOS, P. S. 1997. Systematics of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae) based on rDNA spacer sequences (ITS): taxonomic congruence with morphology and plastid sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 1137-1155.
74. _, K. C. NIXON, AND J. J. DOYLE. 1993. Cladistic analysis of of chloroplast DNA restriction site from the inverted repeat region of "higher" Hamamelididae. Systematic Botany 18: 551-562.
75. MARTIN, P. G., AND J. M. DOWD. 1993. Using sequences of rbcL to study phylogeny and biogeography of Nothofagus species. Australian Systematic Botany 6: 441-447.
76. MEURER-GRIMES, B. 1995. New evidence for the systematic significance of acylated spermidines and flavonoids in pollen of Higher Hamamelidae. Brittonia 47: 130-142.
77. MORGAN, D. R., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631-660.
78. MULLER, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Botanical Review 47: 1-145.
79. NIXON, K. C. 1982. In support of the Nothofagaceae Kuprianova. American Journal of Botany 162: 102 (Abstract).
80. _. 1985. A biosystematic study of Quercus section Virentes (the live oaks) with phylogenetic analyses of Fagales, Fagaceae and Quercus. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas, Austin, TX.
81. _. 1989. Origins of Fagaceae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 2, 'Higher' Hamamelidae, 23-44. Clarendon, Oxford.
82. _, AND W. L. CREPET. 1989. Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae): taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 76: 828-841.
83. OGINUMA, K., Z. GU, AND Z.-S. YUE. 1995. Karyomorphology of Rhoiptelea (Rhoipteleaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 46: 147-151.
84. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
85. PRAGLOWSKI, J. 1982. Fagaceae L. (Fagoideae). In S. Nilsson [ed.], World pollen and spore flora II, 1-28. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
86. QIU, Y.-L., M. W. CHASE, D. H. LES, AND C. R. PARKS. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 587-606.
87. SCHOCH, R. M. 1986. Phylogeny reconstruction in paleontology. Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York, NY.
88. SMILEY, C. J., AND L. M. HUGGINS. 1981. Pseudofagus idahoensis, n. gen. et sp. (Fagaceae) from the Miocene Clarkia Flora of Idaho. American Journal of Botany 68: 741-761.
89. SMITH, J. F., AND J. J. DOYLE. 1995. A cladistic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and morphology for the genera of the Juglandaceae. American Journal of Botany 82: 1163-1172.
90. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, D. R. MORGAN, S. M. SWENSON, G. C. MULLIN, J. M. DOWD, AND P. G. MARTIN. 1995. Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 2647-2651.
91. STEELE, K. P., AND R. VILGALYS. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
92. STONE, D. E. 1973. Patterns in the evolution of amentiferous fruits. Brittonia 25: 371-384.
93. _. 1993. Juglandaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 348-358. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
94. _, AND C. R. BROOME. 1977. Pollen ultrastructure: evidence for relationship of the Juglandaceae and the Rhoipteleaceae. Pollen et Spores 13: 5-14.
95. Lys (UUU) gene contains a 2.5-kilobase-pair intron: An open reading frame and a conserved boundary sequence in the intron. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 82: 3557-3561.
96. SUNDBERG, M. D. 1985. Pollen of the Myricacae. Pollen et Spores 27: 15-28.
97. SWENSON, S. M. 1996. The evolution of actinorhizal symbioses: evidence for multiple origins of the symbiotic association. American Journal of Botany 83: 1503-1512.
98. _, B. C. MULLIN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1994. Phylogenetic affinities of Datiscaceae based on an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid rbcL gene. Systematic Botany 19: 157-168.
99. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
100. _, AND G. J. OLSEN. 1990. Phylogenetic reconstruction. In D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz [eds.], Molecular systematics, 411-501. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
101. SYTSMA, K. J., E. CONTI, M. NEPOKROEFF, J. C. PIRES, Y.-L, QIU, AND M. W. CHASE. 1996. Urticales: rbcL sequences clarify placement in Rosidae, composition, and familial relationships. American Journal of Botany 83: 197 (Abstract).
102. TAKHTAJAN, A. L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanical Review 46: 225-359.
103. _. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, Leningrad.
104. THORNE, R. F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-390.
105. TOBE, H. 1991. Reproduction morphology, anatomy, and relationship of Ticodendron. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 135-142.
106. VAN STEENIS C. G. G. J. 1953. Results of the Archbold expeditions: Papuan Nothofagus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 34: 301-374.
107. WALKER, J. W., AND J. A. DOYLE. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 664-723.
108. WITHNER, C. L. 1941. Stem anatomy and phylogeny of the Rhoipteleaceae. American Journal of Botany 28: 872-878.
109. WOLFE, J. A. 1974. Fossil forms of Amentiferae. Brittonia 25: 334-355.
110. _. 1989. Leaf-architecture analysis of the Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, Introduction and 'Lower' Hamamelidae, 75-104. Clarendon, Oxford.
111. WU, C.-Y., AND K. KUBITZKI. 1993. Rhoipteleaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 584-584. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
112. ZAVADA, M. S., AND D. L. DILCHER. 1986. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 348-381.