Phylogenetics of the hamamelidae and their allies: Parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcl

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 159, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 891-905

  Qiu, Yin Long ^a,d   Chase, Mark W ^a,e   Hoot, Sara B ^b,f   Conti, Elena ^c,g   Crane, Peter R ^b   Sytsma, Kenneth J ^c   Parks, Clifford R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; CASUARINA; DIRACHMA; ELAEAGNUS; NITROGEN FIXATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PAEONIA; PAPAVERALES; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENETICS; PLASTID; RANUNCULALES; RHAMNUS; SAPINDALES;

EID: 0032414575     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/314084     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Abbe EC 1974 Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentiferae." Bot Rev (Lancaster) 40:159-261.
2. Ahond A, M-M Debray, F Picot, C Poupat, V Sánchez, P Potier 1980 Alcaloïdes stéroïdiques de Didymeles cf. madagascariensis. Planta Med 39:204.
3. Bailey IW, CG Nast 1945 Morphology and relationships of Trochodendron and Tetracentron. I. Stem, root, and leaf. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 26:143-154.
4. Baillon H 1872 Histoire des plantes. Vol 3. Hachette, Paris.
5. Barabé D, Y Bergeron, G Vincent 1987 La répartition des caractères dans la classification des Hamamelididae (Angiospermae). Can J Bot 65:1756-1767.
6. Bate-Smith EC 1962 The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. I. Dicotyledons. J Linn Soc Bot 58:95-173.
7. Behnke H-D 1989 Sieve-element plastids, phloem proteins, and the evolution of flowering plants. IV. Hamamelidae. Pages 105-128 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
8. Bentham G, JD Hooker 1862 Genera plantarum. Vol I. L. Reeve, London.
9. Bessey CE 1915 The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 2:109-164.
10. Bogle AL 1989 The floral morphology, vascular anatomy, and ontogeny of the Rhodoleioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and their significance in relation to the "lower" hamamelids. Pages 201-220 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
11. Bogle AL, CT Philbrick 1980 A generic atlas of Hamamelidaceous pollens. Contrib Gray Herb Harv Univ 210:29-103.
12. Carlquist S 1976 Wood anatomy of Myrothamnus flabellifolia (Myrothamnaceae) and the problem of multiperforate perforation plates. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 57:119-126.
13. _ 1982 Wood anatomy of Buxaceae: correlations with ecology and phylogeny. Flora 172:463-491.
14. Chang HT 1979 Hamamelidaceae. Pages 36-116 in HT Chang, ed. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae. Vol 35, no 2. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese.)
15. Chase MW, HG Hills 1991 Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40:215-220.
16. Chase MW, DE Soltis, RG Olmstead, D Morgan, DH Les, BD Mishler, MR Duvall, RA Price, HG Hills, Y-L Qiu, KA Kron, JH Rettig, E Conti, JD Palmer, JR Manhart, KJ Sytsma, HJ Michaels, WJ Kress, KG Karol, WD Clark, M Hedren, BS Gaut, RK Jansen, K-J Kim, CF Wimpee, JF Smith, GR Furnier, SH Strauss, Q-Y Xiang, GM Plunkett, PS Soltis, S Swensen, SE Williams, PA Gadek, CJ Quinn, LE Eguiarte, E Golenberg, GH Learn Jr, SW Graham, SCH Barrett, S Dayanandan, VA Albert 1993 Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:528-580.
17. Corner EJH 1976 The seeds of dicotyledons. Vols I-II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Crabtree DR 1987 Angiosperms of the northern Rocky Mountains: Albian to Campanian (Cretaceous) Megafossil floras. Ann Mo Bot Gard 74:707-747.
19. Crane PR 1984 A re-evaluation of Cercidiphyllum-like plant fossils from the British early Tertiary. Bot J Linn Soc 89:199-230.
20. _ 1989 Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of non-magnoliid dicotyledons. Plant Syst Evol 162:165-191.
21. Crane PR, S Blackmore, eds 1989a Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 1. Introduction and "lower" Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
22. _ 1989b Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 2. "Higher" Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
23. Crane PR, EM Friis, KR Pedersen 1986 Lower Cretaceous angiosperm flowers: fossil evidence on early radiation of dicotyledons. Science 232:852-854.
24. _ 1995 The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374:27-33.
25. Crane PR, KR Pedersen, EM Friis, AN Drinnan 1993 Early Cretaceous (early to middle Albian) Platanoid inflorescences associated with Sapindopsis leaves from the Potomac Group of eastern North America. Syst Bot 18:328-344.
26. Crane PR, RA Stockey 1986 Morphology and development of pistillate inflorescences in extant and fossil Cercidiphyllaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:382-393.
27. Crepet WL, KC Nixon, EM Friis, JV Freudenstein 1992 Oldest fossil flowers of hamamelidaceous affinity from the Late Cretaceous of New Jersey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:8986-8989.
28. Cronquist A 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
29. _ 1988 The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2d ed. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
30. Dahlgren G 1989 The last Dahlgrenogram, system of classification of the dicotyledons. Pages 249-260 in K Tan, ed. Plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
31. _ 1991 Steps toward a natural system of the dicotyledons: embryological characters. Aliso 13:107-165.
32. Dahlgren RMT 1975 A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot Not 128:119-147.
33. _ 1980 A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot J Linn Soc 80:91-124.
34. _ 1981 A revised classification of the angiosperms with comments on correlation between chemical and other characters. Pages 149-204 in DA Young, DS Seigler, eds. Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny. Praeger, New York.
35. Dickison WC 1989 Comparison of primitive Rosidae and Hamamelidae. Pages 47-73 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
36. Dickison WC, EM Sweitzer 1970 The morphology and relationships of Barbeya oleoides. Am J Bot 57:468-476.
37. Dilcher DL 1979 Early angiosperm reproduction: an introductory report. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 27:291-328.
38. Dilcher DL, WL Kovach 1986 Early angiosperm reproduction: Caloda delevoryana gen. et sp. nov., a new fructification from the Dakota formation (Cenomanian) of Kansas. Am J Bot 73:1230-1237.
39. Doyle JA 1969 Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and its evolutionary significance. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 50:1-35.
40. Doyle JA, MJ Donoghue, EA Zimmer 1994 Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81:419-450.
41. Doyle JJ, JS Doyle 1987 A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11-15.
42. Drinnan AN, PR Crane, EM Friis, KR Pedersen 1991 Angiosperm flowers and tricolpate pollen of buxaceous affinity from the Potamac Group (mid-Cretaceous) of eastern North America. Am J Bot 78: 153-176.
43. Ehrendorfer F 1977 New ideas about the early differentiation of angiosperms in flowering plants. Pages 227-234 in K Kubitzki, ed. Evolution and classification of higher categories. Plant Syst Evol, suppl 1. Springer, Wien.
44. Eichler AW 1883 Syllabus der Vorlesungen über specielle und medicinisch-pharmaceutische Botanik, dritte Auflage. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.
45. Endress PK 1967 Systematische Studien über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot Jahrb 87:431-525.
46. _ 1986 Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in Trochodendrales. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:297-324.
47. _ 1989a Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the Lower Hamamelididae. Plant Syst Evol 162: 193-211.
48. _ 1989b The systematic position of the Myrothamnaceae. Pages 193-200 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
49. _ 1989c A suprageneric taxonomic classification of the Hamamelidaceae. Taxon 38:371-376.
50. Endress PK, EM Friis 1991 Archamamelis, hamamelidalean flowers from the Upper Cretaceous of Sweden. Plant Syst Evol 175:101-114.
51. Endress PK, LD Hufford 1989 The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns among Magnoliidae. Bot J Linn Soc 100:45-85.
52. Engler A, K Prantl, eds 1889 Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Teil 3, Abteilung 1. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
53. Erdtman G 1952 Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy, angiosperms. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
54. Felsenstein J 1981 Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368-376.
55. _ 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
56. Fitch WM 1971 Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406-416.
57. Friis EM, PR Crane 1989 Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Hamamelidae. Pages 155-174 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
58. Friis EM, PR Crane, KR Pedersen 1988 Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Platanaceae. K Dan Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr 31:1-55.
59. _ 1991 Stamen diversity and in situ pollen of Cretaceous angiosperms. Pages 169-195 in S Blackmore, SH Barnes, eds. Pollen and spores. Clarendon, Oxford.
60. Friis EM, KR Pedersen, PR Crane 1994 Angiosperm floral structures from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal. Pages 31-49 in PK Endress, EM Friis, eds. Early evolution of flowers. Plant Syst Evol, suppl 8. Springer, Wien.
61. Gadek GA, ES Fernando, CJ Quinn, SB Hoot, T Terrazas, MC Sheahan, MW Chase 1996 Sapindales: molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. Am J Bot 83:802-811.
62. Gangadhara M, JA Inamdar 1977 Trichomes and stomata, and their taxonomic significance in the Urticales. Plant Syst Evol 127: 121-137.
63. Giannasi DE 1986 Phytochemical aspects of phylogeny in Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:417-437.
64. Grund C, U Jensen 1981 Systematic relationships of the Saxifragales revealed by serological characteristics of seed proteins. Plant Syst Evol 137:1-22.
65. Gunter LE, G Kochert, DE Giannasi 1994 Phylogenetic relationships of the Juglandaceae. Plant Syst Evol 192:11-29.
66. Hallier H 1904 Über die Gattung Daphniphyllum, ein übergangsglied von den Magnoliaceen und Hamamelidaceen zu den Katzchenblütlern. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 18:55-69.
67. _ 1905 Provisional scheme of the natural (phylogenetic) system of flowering plants. New Phytol 4:151-162.
68. Hardman R 1987 Recent developments in our knowledge of steroids. Planta Med 53:233-238.
69. Harms H 1930 Hamamelidaceae. Pages 303-345 in A Engler, K Prantl, eds. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2d ed. Vol 18a. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
70. Hegnauer R 1977 Cyanogenic compounds as systematic markers in Tracheophyta. Pages 191-209 in K Kubitzki, ed. Evolution and classification of higher categories. Plant Syst Evol, suppl 1. Springer, Wien.
71. Hickey LJ, JA Doyle 1977 Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution. Bot Rev (Lancaster) 43:3-104.
72. Hickey LJ, JA Wolfe 1975 The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:538-589.
73. Hillis DM 1996 Inferring complex phytogenies. Nature 383: 130-131.
74. Hoot SB, PR Crane 1995 Inter-familial relationships in the Ranunculidae based on molecular systematics. Pages 119-131 in U Jensen, JW Kadereit, eds. Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Syst Evol, suppl 9. Springer, Wien.
75. Huang G-L 1986 Comparative anatomical studies on the woods of the Hamamelidaceae in China. Sunyatsenia 1:24-26. (In Chinese.)
76. Huang T-C 1965 Monograph of Daphniphyllaceae (1). Taiwania 11: 57-98.
77. Hufford L 1992 Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann Mo Bot Gard 79:218-248.
78. Hufford L, PR Crane 1989 A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the "lower" Hamamelidae. Pages 175-192 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
79. Hufford L, PK Endress 1989 The diversity of anther structures and dehiscence patterns among Hamamelidae. Bot J Linn Soc 99: 301-346.
80. Hutchinson J 1926 The families of flowering plants. Vol 1. Macmillan, London.
81. Johri BM, KB Ambegaokar, PS Srivastava 1992 Comparative embryology of angiosperms. Springer, Berlin.
82. Kapil RN, AK Bhatnagar 1994 The contribution of embryology to the systematics of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81: 145-159.
83. Kishino H, M Hasegawa 1989 Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170-179.
84. Köhler E 1980 Zur Pollenmorphologie und systematischen Stellung der Didymelaceae Leandri. Feddes Repert 91:581-591.
85. Kubitzki K, OR Gottlieb 1984 Micromolecular patterns and the evolution and major classification of angiosperms. Taxon 33:375-391.
86. Lu A-M, J-Q Li, K-X Xu 1991 A phylogenetic analysis of families in the Hamamelidae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 29:481-493. (In Chinese with English summary.)
87. Maddison WP, DR Maddison 1992 MacClade, version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
88. Manos PS, KC Nixon, JJ Doyle 1993 Cladistic analysis of restriction site variation within the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat region of selected Hamamelididae. Syst Bot 18:551-562.
89. Manos PS, KP Steele 1997 Phylogenetic analysis of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. Am J Bot 84: 1407-1419.
90. Martin PG, JM Dowd 1991 Studies of angiosperm phylogeny using protein sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:296-337.
91. Meurer B, R Wiermann, D Strack 1988 Phenylpropanoid patterns in Fagales pollen and their phylogenetic relevance. Phytochemistry 27: 823-828.
92. Mohana Rao PR 1974 Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology 24:113-139.
93. Morawetz W, MRA Samuel 1989 Karyological patterns in the Hamamelidae. Pages 129-154 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
94. Muller J 1970 Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol Rev 45:417-450.
95. _ 1981 Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot Rev (Lancaster) 47:1-142.
96. Nakai T 1943 Ordines, familiae, tribi, genera, sectiones, species, varietates et combinationes novae. Imperial University, Tokyo.
97. Nast CG, IW Bailey 1946 Morphology of Euptelea and comparison with Trochodendron. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 27:186-192.
98. Olmstead RG, HJ Michaels, KM Scott, JD Palmer 1992 Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 79:249-265.
99. Olsen GJ, H Matsuda, R Hagstrom, R Overbeek 1994 fastDNAml: a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci 10:41-48.
100. Pan K-Y, A-M Lu, J Wen 1990 Characters of leaf epidermis in Hamamelidaceae (s.l.). Acta Phytotaxon Sin 28:10-26. (In Chinese with English summary.)
101. Petersen FP, DE Fairbrothers 1979 Serological investigation of selected amentiferous taxa. Syst Bot 4:230-241.
102. _ 1983 A serotaxonomic appraisal of Amphipterygium and Leitneria - two amentiferous taxa of Rutiflorae (Rosidae). Syst Bot 8:134-148.
103. _ 1985 A serotaxonomic appraisal of the "Amentiferae." Bull Torrey Bot Club 112:43-52.
104. Polechko MA, RB Clarkson 1986 A serological study of the systematics of the Juglandaceae. Biochem Syst Ecol 14:33-39.
105. Praglowski J 1974 The pollen morphology of the Trochodendraceae, Tetracentraceae, Cercidiphyllaceae, and Eupteleaceae, with reference to taxonomy. Pollen Spores 16:449-467.
106. Qiu Y-L, MW Chase, DH Les, CR Parks 1993 Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:587-606.
107. Sánchez V, A Ahond, M-M Debray, F Picot, C Poupat 1984 Alcaloïdes des écorces de tronc de Didymeles cf. madagascariensis (Didymélacées). Bull Soc Chim Fr 2:71-76.
108. Savolainen V, CM Morton, SB Hoot, MW Chase 1996 An examination of phylogenetic patterns of plastid atpB gene sequences among eudicots. Am J Bot 83:S190 (abstract).
109. Solereder H 1899 Zur Morphologie und Systematik der Gattung Cercidiphyllum Sieb. et Zucc. mit Berucksichtigung der Gattung Eucommia Oliv. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 17:387-406.
110. Soltis DE, PS Soltis 1997 Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Am J Bot 84:504-522.
111. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, DR Morgan, SM Swensen, BC Mullin, JM Dowd, PG Martin 1995 Chloroplast gene sequence data suggests a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2647-2651.
112. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, DL Nickrent, LA Johnson, WJ Hahn, SB Hoot, JA Sweere, RK Kuzoff, KA Kron, MW Chase, S M Swensen, EA Zimmer, S-M Chaw, LJ Gillespie, WJ Kress, KJ Sytsma 1997 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 84:1-49.
113. Stern WL 1973 Development of the Amentiferous concept. Brittonia 25:316-333.
114. Swofford DL 1998 PAUP* 4.0: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
115. Takhtajan A 1980 Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot Rev (Lancaster) 46:225-348.
116. _ 1987 Systema Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, Leninopoli. (In Russian.)
117. Thorne RF 1968 Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 6:57-66.
118. _ 1992 Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Bot Rev (Lancaster) 58:225-348.
119. Tiffney BH 1986 Fruit and seed dispersal and the evolution of the Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:394-416.
120. Tippo O 1940 The comparative anatomy of the secondary xylem and the phytogeny of the Eucommiaceae. Am J Bot 27:832-838.
121. Tobe H, M Takahashi 1990 Trichome and pollen morphology of Barbeya (Barbeyaceae) and its relationships. Taxon 39:561-567.
122. Upchurch GR 1984 Cuticle evolution in early Cretaceous angiosperms from the Potomac Group of Virginia and Maryland. Ann Mo Bot Gard 71:522-550.
123. Upchurch GR, PR Crane, AN Drinnan 1994 The megaflora from the Quantico locality (Upper Albian), Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group of Virginia. Va Mus Nat Hist Mem 4:1-57.
124. Vakhrameev VA, VA Krassilov 1979 Reproductive organs of flowering plants from the Albian of Kazakhstan. Paleontol Zh 1: 121-128. (In Russian.)
125. Varossieau WW 1942 On the taxonomic position of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (Eucommiaceae). Blumea 5:81-92.
126. Walker JW, JA Doyle 1975 The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:664-723.
127. Walker JW, AG Walker 1984 Ultrastructure of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and the origin and early evolution of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 71:464-521.
128. Wang X-Z 1992 Palaeopalynological evidence of phylogeny in Hamamelidaceae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 30:137-145. (In Chinese with English summary.)
129. Ward JV, JA Doyle 1988 Possible affinities of two triporoidate tetrads from the mid-Cretaceous of Laurasia. Page 179 in Abstracts, Seventh International Palynological Congress, Brisbane.
130. Wettstein RRv 1907 Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. Band 2, Theil 2, Haelfte 1. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig und Wein.
131. Wolfe JA 1973 Fossil forms of Amentiferae. Brittonia 25:334-355.
132. _ 1989 Leaf-architectural analysis of the Hamamelidae. Pages 75-104 in Crane and Blackmore 1989a.
133. Wolfe JA, JA Doyle, VM Page 1975 The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: paleobotany. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:801-824.
134. Zavada MS, DL Dilcher 1986 Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:348-381.
135. Zhang Y-L, F-H Wang, N-F Chien 1988 A study on pollen morphology of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 26: 367-370. (In Chinese with English summary.)
136. Zhang Zhi-Yun, A-M Lu 1989 Phylogenetic relationship of the Daphniphyllaceae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 27:17-26. (In Chinese with English summary.)
137. Zhang Zhi-Yu, A-M Lu, K-Y Pan, J Wen 1990 The anatomy, embryology and systematic relationships of Eucommiaceae. Acta Phytotaxon Sin 28:430-441. (In Chinese with English summary.)
138. Zhou R-H, Z-H Jiang 1990 Chemical constituents of the Hamamelidae and their systematic significance. Cathaya 2:63-76.