Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 227-251

  Wahlberg, Niklas ^a   Brower, Andrew V Z ^b   Nylin, Sören ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DIVA; Molecular phylogeny; Partitioned Bremer Support; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

COLOBURA; JUNONIA; JUNONIA COENIA; KALLIMINI; LEPIDOPTERA; MELITAEINI; NEARCTIC; NYMPHALIDAE; NYMPHALINAE; NYMPHALINI; NYMPHALIS; TIGRIDIA;

EID: 26844525775     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00531.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ackery PR. 1984. Systematic and faunistic studies on butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR, eds. The biology of butterflies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 9-21.
2. Ackery PR. 1988. Hostplants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 33: 95-203.
3. Ackery PR, de Jong R, Vane-Wright RI. 1999. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperoidea and Papilionoidea. In: Kristensen NP, ed. Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. 1. Evolution, systematics and biogeography. Handbook of Zoology 4 (35), Lepidoptera. Berlin: de Gruyter, 263-300.
4. Austin GT, Murphy DD, Baughman JF, Launer AE, Fleishman E. 2003. Hybridization of checkerspot butterflies in the Great Basin. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 57: 176-192.
5. Baker RH, DeSalle R. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Systematic Biology 46: 654-673.
6. Baker RH, Yu X, DeSalle R. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 427-436.
7. Blum MJ, Bermingham E, Dasmahapatra K. 2003. A molecular phylogeny of the neotropical butterfly genus Anartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 46-55.
8. Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, Kesbeke F, Wijngaarden PJ, Monteiro A, French V, Carroll SB. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384: 236-242.
9. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
10. Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
11. Brower AVZ. 1994. Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3: 159-174.
12. Brower AVZ. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 1201-1211.
13. Brower AVZ, DeSalle R. 1998. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Molecular Biology 7: 73-82.
14. Carroll SB, Gates J, Keys DN, Paddock SW, Panganiban GEF, Selegue JE, Williams JA. 1994. Pattern-formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265: 109-114.
15. Clark AH. 1948. Classification of the butterflies with the allocation of the genera occurring in America north of Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 61: 77-84.
16. Cognato AI, Vogler AP. 2001. Exploring data interaction and nucleotide alignment in a multiple gene analysis of Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Systematic Biology 50: 758-780.
17. Damgaard J, Cognato AI. 2003. Sources of character conflict in a clade of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Cladistics 19: 512-526.
18. Darlu P, Lecointre G. 2002. When does the Incongruence Length Difference test fail? Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 432-437.
19. Dasmahaptra KK, Blum MJ, Aiello A, Hackwell S, Davies N, Bermingham EP, Mallet J. 2002. Inferences from a rapidly moving hybrid zone. Evolution 56: 741-753.
20. DeSalle R, Brower AVZ. 1997. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Systematic Biology 46: 751-764.
21. DeVries PJ, Kitching IJ, Vane-Wright RI. 1985. The systematic position of Antirrhea and Caerois, with comments on the classification of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Systematic Entomology 10: 11-32.
22. Ehrlich PR. 1958. The comparative morphology, phylogeny and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 39: 305-370.
23. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing the significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
24. Forbes WTM. 1928. Variation in Junonia lavinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 36: 305-320.
25. Fox RM, Forbes AC. 1971. The butterflies of the genera Siproeta and Metamorpha (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Annals of the Carnegie Museum 43: 223-247.
26. Freitas AVL, Brown KSJ. 2004. Phylogeny of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Systematic Biology 53: 363-383.
27. Fric Z, Konvicka M, Zrzavý J. 2004. Red & black or black & white? Phylogeny of the Araschnia butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and evolution of seasonal polyphenism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 265-278.
28. Gatesy J, O'Grady P, Baker RH. 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15: 271-313.
29. Giribet G. 2003. Stability in phylogenetic formulations and its relation to nodal support. Systematic Biology 52: 554-564.
30. Goloboff PA. 1998. NONA. 2.0. Published by the author.
31. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment, editing and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
32. Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Harvey DJ. 1991. Higher classification of the Nymphalidae, Appendix B. In: Nijhout HF, ed. The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 255-273.
34. Higgins LG. 1981. A revision of Phyciodes Hübner and related genera, with a review of the classification of the Melitaeinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 43: 77-243.
35. Howarth TG. 1966. Revisional notes on the genus Antanartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 18: 21-43.
36. Janz N, Nylin S, Nyblom K. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55: 783-796.
37. de Jong R, Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR. 1996. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomologica scandinavica 27: 65-101.
38. Judd DD. 1998. Exploring component stability using life-stage concordance in sabethine mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Cladistics 14: 64-94.
39. Kons HLJ. 2000. Phylogenetic studies of the Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae) and a revision of the genus Chlosyne. Gainesville: Butler Department of Entomology & Nematology, University of Florida, 799.
40. Kuznetzov VI, Stekolnikov AA. 2001. New approaches to the system of Lepidoptera of world fauna. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
41. Lambkin CL, Lee MSY, Winterton SL, Yeates DK. 2002. Partitioned Bremer support and multiple trees. Cladistics 18: 436-444.
42. Larsen TB. 1991. The butterflies of Kenya and their natural history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. de Lesse H. 1952. Note sur les genres Precis Hb. et Junonia Hb. (Lep. Nymphalidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 57: 74-77.
44. Miller JS, Brower AVZ, DeSalle R. 1997. Phylogeny of the neotropical moth tribe Josiini (Notodontidae: Dioptinae): comparing and combining evidence from DNA sequences and morphology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 297-316.
45. Monteiro A, Pierce NE. 2001. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF1alpha gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 264-281.
46. Müller W. 1886. Südamerikanische Nymphalidaeraupen: Versuch eines natürlichen Systems der Nymphaliden. Zoologische Jahrbücher 1: 417-678.
47. Muyshondt AJ, Muyshondt A. 1979. Notes on the life cycle and natural history of butterflies of El Salvador. III C. Historis odius and Coea acheronta (Nymphalidae-Coloburinae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 33: 112-123.
48. Nakanishi A. 1989. Immature stages of Antanartia abyssinica (Felder) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Japanese Journal of Entomology 57: 712-719.
49. Nixon KC. 2002. WINCLADA, 1.00.08. Published by the author.
50. Nylin S. 1988. Host plant specialization and seasonality in a polyphagous butterfly, Polygonia c-album (Nymphalidae). Oikos 53: 381-386.
51. Nylin S, Nyblom K, Ronquist F, Janz N, Belicek J, Källersjö M. 2001. Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a total-evidence analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132: 441-468.
52. Parsons M. 1999. The butterflies of Papua New Guinea: Their systematics and biology. London: Academic Press.
53. Penz C, Peggie D. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among Heliconiinae genera based on morphology (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Systematic Entomology 28: 451-479.
54. Reed RD, Sperling FAH. 1999. Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 286-297.
55. Ronquist F. 1996. DIVA, 1.1. Program and manual available from Uppsala University (ftp.uu.se or ftp.systbot.uu.se).
56. Ronquist F. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology 46: 195-203.
57. Rothschild W, Jordan K. 1903. Lepidoptera collected by Oscar Neumann in north-east Africa. Novitates Zoologica 10: 491-542.
58. Scott JA. 1984. A review of Polygonia progne (oreas) and P. gracilis (zephyrus) (Nymphalidae), including a new subspecies from the southern Rocky Mountains. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 23: 197-210.
59. Scott JA. 1985. The phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperoidea). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 23: 241-281.
60. Scott JA, Wright DM. 1990. Butterfly phylogeny and fossils. In: Kudrna O, ed. Butterflies of Europe. 2. Wiesbaden, 152-208.
61. Shapiro AM, Geiger H. 1989. Electrophoretic comparisons of vicariant Vanessa: genetic differentiation between V. annabella and V. carye (Nymphalidae) since the Great American Interchange. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 43: 81-92.
62. Shirôzu T, NakanashiNakanishi A. 1984. A revision of the genus Kallima Doubleday (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Tyô to Ga 34: 97-110.
63. Silberglied RE. 1984. Visual communication and sexual selection among butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR, eds. The biology of butterflies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 204-223.
64. Singer MC. 1971. Evolution of food-plant preference in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Evolution 25: 383-389.
65. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
66. Vári L. 1979. The butterflies of southern Africa. Part IV: Nymphalidae; Nymphalinae. Pretoria, South Africa: Transvaal Museum.
67. Wahlberg N. 2001. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host plant specialization in melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 55: 522-537.
68. Wahlberg N, Nylin S. 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics 19: 213-223.
69. Wahlberg N, Oliveira R, Scott JA. 2003a. Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations. Systematic Entomology 28: 257-273.
70. Wahlberg N, Weingartner E, Nylin S. 2003b. Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 473-484.
71. Wahlberg N, Zimmermann M. 2000. Pattern of phylogenetic relationships among members of the tribe Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences. Cladistics 16: 347-363.
72. Weller SJ, Pashley DP, Martin JA. 1996. Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 184-192.
73. Wheeler WC. 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Systematic Biology 44: 321-331.
74. Willmott KR, Hall JPW, Lamas G. 2001. Systematics of Hypanartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae), with a test for geographical speciation mechanisms in the Andes. Systematic Entomology 26: 369-399.
75. Zimmermann M, Wahlberg N, Descimon H. 2000. Phylogeny of Euphydryas checkerspot butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 347-355.