Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): A total-evidence analysis

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 441-468

  Nylin, Sören ^a   Nyblom, Klas ^a   Ronquist, Fredrik ^b   Janz, Niklas ^a   Belicek, Joseph ^b   Källersjö, Mari ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b 15004 96 Avenue ^*

^c Department of Phanerogamic Botany   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cladistics; Mitochondrial DNA; Nuclear DNA; Nymphalini; Phylogenetic ecology; Systematics; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

AGLAIS; ANTANARTIA; ARASCHNIA; CYNTHIA; HYPANARTIA; INACHIS; KANISKA; LEPIDOPTERA; MYNES; NYMPHALIDAE; NYMPHALINI; NYMPHALIS; NYMPHALIS VAUALBUM; PAPILIONOIDEA; POLYGONIA; RODDIA; RODDIA L-ALBUM; SYMBRENTHIA; VANESSA;

EID: 0035536907     PISSN: 00244082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2001.tb02470.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ackery PR. 1988. Hostplants and classification: a review of nymphalid butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 33: 95-203.
2. Aubert J, Barascud B, Descimon H, Michel F. 1996. Systématique moléculaire des Argynnes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Compte Rendue de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, Life Sciences 319: 647-651.
3. Brooks DR, McLennan DH. 1991. Phytogeny, ecology, and behavior. A research program in comparative biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Brower AVZ, DeSalle R. 1998. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Molecular Biology 7: 73-82.
5. Brower AVZ, Egan MG. 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264: 969-977.
6. Carroll SB, Gates J, Keys DN, Paddock SW, Panganiban GEF, Selegue JE, Williams JA. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265: 109-114.
7. Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR. 1985. The mitichondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 252-271.
8. Common IFB, Waterhouse DF. 1972. Butterflies of Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
9. De la Maza EJ, White Lopez A. 1986. Redescubrimento de Nymphalis cyanomelas (Dbld. & Hew.) en Mexico. (Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae). Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Lepidopterologica X: 35-39.
10. DeVries PJ. 1987. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and their Natural History: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Eriksson T, Wikström N. 1996. Auto Decay. Version 3.0.3 ed. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Botany, Stockholm University (distributed by the authors).
12. Esper EJC. 1780. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen von Eugenius Johann Cristoph Esper. Erste Theil. Europäische Gattungen. Leipzig: L.D. Weigel.
13. Field WD. 1971. Butterflies of the genus Vanessa and of the resurrected genera Bassaris and Cynthia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
14. Harvey DJ. 1991. Higher classification of the Nymphalidae. In: Nijhout HF, ed. The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Washington: Smithsonian University Press, 255-276.
15. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Hawkswood TJ. 1990. Observations on the egg of Mynes geoffroyi guerini Wallace (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Victorian Entomologist 20: 148-150.
17. Higgins LG. 1975. The classification of European butterflies. London: Collins.
18. Janz N, Nyblom K, Nylin. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 58: 783-796.
19. Janz N, Nylin S. 1998. Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. Evolution 52: 486-502.
20. Johnston G, Johnston B. 1980. This is Hong Kong: Butterflies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Publications.
21. Kocak AÖ. 1981. Critical check-list of European Papilionoidea. Priamus 1: 46-90.
22. Korshunov Y. 1996. Dopolneniya i ispravleniya k knigen "Dnevnye babochki aziatskoi chasti Rossii". [Additions and corrections to the book "Butterflies of the Asian part of Russia"]. Novosibirsk: ETA Group.
23. Korshunov Y, Gorbunov P. 1995. Dnevnye babochki aziatskoi chasti Rossii. Spravochnik. [Butterflies of the Asian part of Russia. A handbook]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press.
24. Larsen TB. 1991. The butterflies of Kenya and their natural history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Layberry RA, Hall PW, Lafontaine JD. 1998. The butterflies of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26. Miller JS, Wenzel JW. 1995. Ecological characters and phylogeny. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 389-415.
27. Miller LD, Miller JY. 1990. Nearctic Aglais and Nymphalis (Lepidoptera. Nymphalidae): Laurasia revisited? The Entomologist 109: 106-115.
28. Müller W. 1886. Südamerikanische Nymphalidenraupen: Versuch eines natürlichen Systems der Nymphaliden. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung Systematik 1: 417-678.
29. Nakanishi A. 1988. Study on the first instar larvae of the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Special Bulletin of Lepidopterological Society of Japan 6: 83-99.
30. Neumann CJ, Cohen SM. 1996. Distinct mitigenic and cell fate specification function of wingless in different regions of the wing. Development 122: 1781-1789.
31. Niculescu EV. 1965. Familia Nymphalidae. Fauna Republicii Populare Romane 11. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romane.
32. Niculescu EV. 1985. Problèmes de systématique dans la famille des Nymphalidae. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, NF 32: 335-347.
33. Nijhout HF. 1991. The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Washington: Smithsonian University Press.
34. Scott JA. 1986. The butterflies of North America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Scudder SH. 1889. The butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada with special reference to New England. Cambridge: Published by the author.
36. Seitz A. 1914. Genus Vanessa. In: Seitz A, ed. Die Grossschmetterlinge der Erde. Stuttgart: Alfred Kernen, 457-458.
37. Shirozu T. 1960. Butterflies of Formosa in colour. Osaka: Hoikusha.
38. Shirozu T, Hara A. 1960. Early stages of Japanese butterflies in colour. Vol. I-II. Osaka: Hoikusha.
39. Sidow A. 1992. Diversification of the Wnt gene family on the ancestral lineage of vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89: 5098-5102.
40. Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4 ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
41. Teshirogi M. 1990. An illustrated book of the Japanese Nymphalidae. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.
42. Wanntorp H-E, Brooks DR, Nilsson T, Nylin S, Ronquist F, Stearns SC, Wedell N. 1990. Phylogenetic approaches in ecology. Oikos 57: 119-132.
43. Weller SJ, Pashley DP, Martin JA. 1996. Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 184-192.
44. Weller SJ, Pashley DP, Martin JA, Constable JL. 1994. Phylogeny of noctuoid moths and the utility of combining independent nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Systematic Biology 43: 194-211.
45. Yagi N, Koyama N. 1963. The compound eye of Lepidoptera: approach from organic evolution. Tokyo: Shinkyo-Press & Co.
46. Zrzavy J. 1997. Phylogenetics and ecology: all characters should be included in the cladistic analysis. Oikos 80: 186-192.