Partitioned Bremer support and multiple trees

Cladistics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 436-444

  Lambkin, Christine L ^a,e   Lee, Michael S Y ^b,c   Winterton, Shaun L ^d   Yeates, David K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Incongruence; Partitioned Bremer support; Simultaneous analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; TREE;

EID: 0036705475     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00159.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baker, R.H., DeSalle, R., 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46, 654-673.
2. Baker, R.H., Yu, X., DeSalle, R., 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 427-436.
3. Barrett, M., Donoghue, M.J., Sober, E., 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40, 486-493.
4. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
5. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
6. DeSalle, R., Brower, A.V.Z., 1997. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46, 751-764.
7. Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995a. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 570-572.
8. Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995b. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319.
9. Frost, D.R., Etheridge, R., 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 81, 1-65.
10. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P., Baker, R.H., 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15, 271-313.
11. Kallersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8, 275-287.
12. Larson, A., 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. In: Schierwater, B., Streit, B., Wagner, G., DeSalle, R. (Eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 371-390.
13. Maddison, W., Maddison, D., 1992. MacClade Version 3.01. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
14. Mickevich, M., Farris, J., 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30, 351-370.
15. Miyamoto, M.M., 1981. Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genus Leptodactylus. Syst. Zool. 30, 281-290.
16. Naylor, G., 1992. Plotting frequency distributions of phylogenetic groupings found among sets of most parsimonious trees. Cladistics 8, 161-164.
17. O'Grady, P.M., Clark, J.B., Kidwell, M.G., 1998. Phylogeny of the Drosophila saltans species group based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 656-664.
18. Page, R.D.M., 1996. On consensus, confidence, and "total evidence". Cladistics 12, 83-92.
19. Remsen, J., DeSalle, R., 1998. Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 225-235.
20. Sorenson, M.D., 1999. TreeRot Version 2, Sorenson, M.D., Boston University, Boston, MA.
21. Swofford, D., 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In: Miyamoto, M.M., Cracraft, J. (Eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 295-333.
22. Swofford, D., 1999. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b2a. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. Templeton, A., 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37, 221-244.
24. Wiens, J.J., 1998. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47, 568-581.
25. Winterton, S.L., Yang, L., Wiegmann, B.M., Yeates, D.K., 2001. Phylogenetic revision of the Agapophytinae sub f.n. (Diptera: Therevidae) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Syst. Entomol. 26, 173-211.