Towards a better understanding of the higher systematics of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 473-484

  Wahlberg, Niklas ^a   Weingartner, Elisabet ^a   Nylin, Sören ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Butterfly; Cladistics; Molecular systematics; Partitioned Bremer Support

Indexed keywords

APATURINAE; BIBLIDINAE; BIBLIDINI; CALINAGINAE; CHARAXINAE; CYRESTINAE; DANAINAE; HELICONIINAE; LEPIDOPTERA; LIMENITIDINAE; MORPHINAE; NYMPHALIDAE; NYMPHALINAE; PAPILIONOIDEA; PSEUDERGOLINI; SATYRINAE;

EID: 0344961749     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00052-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ackery, P.R., 1984. Systematic and faunistic studies on butterflies. In: Vane-Wright, R.I., Ackery, P.R. (Eds.), Systematic and Faunistic Studies on Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, pp. 9-21.
2. Ackery, P.R., de Jong, R., Vane-Wright, R.I., 1999. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperoidea, and Papilionoidea. In: Kristensen, N.P. (Ed.), The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperoidea, and Papilionoidea. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 263-300.
3. Baker, R.H., DeSalle, R., 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46, 654-673.
4. Baker, R.H., Yu, X., DeSalle, R., 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 427-436.
5. Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B., Ehrlich, P.R. (Eds.), 2003. Butterflies: Evolution and Ecology Taking Flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
6. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
7. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.20.
8. Brower, A.V.Z., 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1201-1211.
9. Brower, A.V.Z., DeSalle, R., 1998. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Ins. Mol. Biol. 7, 73-82.
10. Caterino, M.S., Sperling, F.A.H., 1999. Papilio phylogeny based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11, 122-137.
11. de Jong, R., Vane-Wright, R.I., Ackery, P.R., 1996. The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Ent. scand. 27, 65-101.
12. DeSalle, R., Freedman, T., Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C., 1987. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26, 157-164.
13. DeVries, P.J., Kitching, I.J., Vane-Wright, R.I., 1985. The systematic position of Antirrhea and Caerois, with comments on the classification of the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera). Syst. Ent. 10, 11-32.
14. Ehrlich, P.R., 1958. The comparative morphology, phylogeny, and higher classification of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 39, 305-370.
15. Farris, J.S., 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18, 374-385.
16. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1994. Testing the significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319.
17. Felsenstein, J., 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410.
18. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
19. Freitas, A.V.L., 1999. Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), filogenia com base em caracteres de imaturos, com experimentos de troca de plantas hospedeiras, Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera), filogenia com base em caracteres de imaturos, com experimentos de troca de plantas hospedeiras. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, pp. xii + 170.
20. Goloboff, P.A., 1998. "NONA," vers. 2.0. Published by author, New York.
21. Hall, T.A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95-98.
22. Harvey, D.J., 1991. Higher classification of the Nymphalidae, Appendix B. In: Nijhout, H.F. (Ed.), Higher Classification of the Nymphalidae, Appendix B. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 255-273.
23. Källersjö, M., Albert, V.A., Farris, J.S., 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15, 91-93.
24. Källersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Chase, M.W., Bremer, B., Fay, M.F., Humphries, C.J., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Bremer, K., 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants, and flowering plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 213, 259-287.
25. Martin, J.A., Pashley, D.P., 1992. Molecular systematic analysis of butterfly family and some subfamily relationships (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85, 127-139.
26. Mitchell, A., Cho, S., Regier, J.C., Mitter, C., Poole, R.W., Matthews, M., 1997. Phylogenetic utility of Elongation Factor-1α, in Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera): the limits of synonymous substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 381-390.
27. Monteiro, A., Pierce, N.E., 2001. Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1α gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18, 264-281.
28. Nixon, K.C., 2002. "Winclada," vers. 1.00.08. Published by author, Ithaca, NY.
29. Nylin, S., Nyblom, K., Ronquist, F., Janz, N., Belicek, J., Källersjö, M., 2001. Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a total-evidence analysis. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 132, 441-468.
30. Parsons, M., 1999. The Butterflies of Papua New Guinea: Their Systematics and Biology. Academic Press, London.
31. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P., 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 651-701.
32. Sorensen, M.D., 1999. "TreeRot," vers. 2.0. Boston University, Boston, MA.
33. Swofford, D.L., 1998. "PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods)," vers. 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
34. Tamura, K., Nei, M., 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of the mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512-526.
35. Wahlberg, N., Oliveira, R., Scott, J.A., 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations. Syst. Ent. 28, 257-273.
36. Wahlberg, N., Zimmermann, M., 2000. Pattern of phylogenetic relationships among members of the tribe Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences. Cladistics 16, 347-363.
37. Weller, S.J., Pashley, D.P., Martin, J.A., 1996. Reassessment of butterfly family relationships using independent genes and morphology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89, 184-192.
38. Wheeler, W.C., 1990. Nucleic acid sequence phylogeny and random outgroups. Cladistics 6, 363-367.
39. Xia, X., Xie, Z., 2001. DAMBE: Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J. Hered. 92, 371-373.