Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency?

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 90-120

  Takahashi, Satomi ^a  

^a RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144439289     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amh040     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Alanen, R. 1995. 'Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language Acquisition' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 259-302.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999. 'Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics,' Language Learning 49: 677-713.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2001. 'Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics?' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-32.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Z. Dörnyei. 1998. 'Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations?: Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in. instructed L2 learning,' TESOL Quarterly 32: 233-62.
5. Beebe, L. M. and T. Takahashi. 1989a. 'Do you have a bag? Social status and patterned variation in second language acquisition' in S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, and L. Selinker (eds): Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 103-28.
6. Beebe, L. M. and T. Takahashi. 1989b. 'Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts' in M. Eisenstein (ed.): The Dynamic Interlanguage. New York: Plenum, pp. 199-218.
7. Bialystok, E. 1988. 'Psycholinguistic dimensions of second language proficiency' in W.Rutherford and M. Sharwood Smith (eds): Grammar and Second Language Teaching. New York: Newbury House, pp. 31-50.
8. Bialystok, E. 1993. 'Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence' in G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds): Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 43-57.
9. Bialystok, E. 1994. 'Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 157-68.
10. Billmyer, K. A. 1990. The Effect of Formal Instruction on the Development of Sociolinguistic Competence: The Performance of Compliments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
11. Blum-Kulka, S. 1982. 'Learning to say what you mean: A study of speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language,' Applied linguistics 3: 29-59.
12. Cook, H. M. 2001. 'Why can't learners of JFL distinguish polite from impolite speech styles?' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80-102.
13. Crooks, G. and B. Schmidt. 1991. 'Motivation: Reopening the research agenda,' Language Learning 41: 469-512.
14. Dörnyei, Z. 1990. 'Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning,' Language Learning 40: 46-78.
15. Dörnyei, Z. 1994. 'Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom,' The Modern Language Journal 78: 273-84.
16. Dörnyei, Z. 1996. 'Moving language learning motivation to a larger platform for theory and practice' in R. Oxford (ed.): Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the New Century (Technical report #11). Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 71-80.
17. Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman.
18. Dörnyei, Z. 2002. The motivational basis of language learning tasks' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137-57.
19. Dörnyei, Z. 2003. 'Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications,' Language Learning 53: 3-32.
20. Dörnyei, Z. and K. Csizér. 2002. 'Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey,' Applied Linguistics 23: 421-62.
21. Doughty, C. 1991. 'Second language acquisition does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431-469.
22. Doughty, C. and J. Williams. 1998. 'Issues and terminology' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-11.
23. Ehrman, M. 1996. 'An exploration of adult language learner motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety' in R. Oxford (ed.): Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the New Century (Technical report #11). Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 81-103.
24. Ellis, R. 1994. 'A theory of instructed second language acquisition' in N. C. Ellis (ed.): Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. London: Academic Press, pp. 79-114.
25. Eysenck, M. W. 1982. Attention and Arousal. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Fotos, S. 1993. 'Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction,' Applied Linguistics 14: 385-407.
27. Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
28. Gardner, R. C. 2001. 'Integrative motivation and second language acquisition' in Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds): Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical report #23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 1-19.
29. Gardner, R. C. and P. MacIntyre. 1993. 'A student's contribution to second language learning. Part II: Affective variables,' Language Teaching 26: 1-11.
30. Gass, S. 1988, 'Integrating research areas: A. framework for second language studies,' Applied Linguistics 9: 198-217.
31. Gass, S. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Hassall, T. J. 1997. Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
33. House, J. 1996. 'Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 225-52.
34. Hulstijn, J. H. 1990. A comparison between the information-processing and the analysis/control approaches to language learning,' Applied Linguistics 11: 30-45.
35. Jourdenais, R., M. Ota, S. Stauffer, B. Boyson, and C. Doughty. 1995. 'Does textural enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 183-216.
36. Julkunen, K. 2001. 'Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning' in Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds): Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical report #23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 29-41.
37. Kasper, G. and S. Blum-Kulka (eds) 1993. Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Kasper, G. and K. R. Rose. 2001. 'Pragmatics in language teaching' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-9.
39. Kasper, G. and K. R. Rose. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
40. Keller, J. M. 1983, 'Motivational design of instruction' in C. M. Reigeluth (ed.): Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 386-433.
41. Kormos, J. 2000. The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production,' Language Learning 50: 343-84.
42. Leow, R. P. 1997. 'Attention, awareness, and foreign language behaviour,' Language Learning 47: 467-505.
43. Leow, R. P. 2000. 'A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 557-84.
44. Long, M. H. and P. Robinson. 1998. 'Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice' in Doughty and Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-41.
45. McCroskey, J. C. and V. P. Richmond. 1991. 'Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view' in M. Booth-Butterfield (ed.): Communication, Cognition, and Anxiety. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 19-37.
46. MacIntyre, p. D. 2002. 'Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-68.
47. MacIntyre, P. D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei, and K. A. Noels. 1998. 'Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation,' The Modern Language Journal 82: 545-62.
48. MacIntyre, P. D., P. A. Babin, and R. Clément. 1999. 'Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences,' Communication Quarterly 47:215-29.
49. MacIntyre, P. D., S. C. Baker, R. Clément, and S. Conrod. 2001. 'Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 369-88.
50. MacIntyre, P. D., S. C. Baker, R. Clément, and L. A. Donovan. 2002. 'Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students,' Language Learning 52: 537-64.
51. Mackey, A., J. Philp, T. Egi, A. Fujii, and T. Tatsumi. 2002. Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development' in P. Robinson (ed.) : Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 181-209.
52. McLaughlin, B., T. Rossman, and B. McLeod. 1983. 'Second language learning: An information-processing perspective,' Language Learning 33: 135-58.
53. Maehr, M. L. and J. Archer. 1987. 'Motivation and school achievement' in L. G. Katz (ed.): Current Topics in Early Childhood Education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 85-107.
54. Maeshiba, N., N. Yoshinaga, G. Kasper, and S. Ross. 1996. Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing' in S. Gass and J. Neu (eds): Speech Acts Across Cultures. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 155-87.
55. Masgoret, A.-M. and R. C. Gardner. 2003. 'Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates,' Language Learning 53: 123-63.
56. Matsumura, S. 2003. 'Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2,' Applied Linguistics 24: 465-91.
57. Nation, R. and B. McLaughlin. 1986. 'Novices and experts: An information processing approach to the "good language learner" problem,' Applied Psycholinguistics 7:41-56.
58. Niezgoda, K. and C. Röver. 2001. 'Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment?' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63-79.
59. Noels, K. A. 2001a. 'New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivation' in Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds): Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical report #23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 43-68.
60. Noels, K. A. 2001b. 'Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of their teachers' communication style,' Language Learning 51: 107-44.
61. Noels, K. A., L. G. Pelletier, R. Clément, and R. J. Vallerand. 2000. 'Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory,' Language Learning 50: 57-85.
62. Olshtain, E. and A. D. Cohen. 1989. 'Speech act behavior across languages' in H. W. Dechert and M. Raupach (eds): Transfer in Language Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 53-67.
63. Oxford, R. and J. Shearin. 1994. 'Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework,' The Modern Language Journal 78: 12-28.
64. Philp, J. 2003. 'Constraints on "Noticing the Gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 99-126.
65. Pintrich, P. R. 1989. 'The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom' in M. Maeher and C. Ames (eds): Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Motivation Enhancing Environments. Orland, FL: Academic Press, pp. 117-60.
66. Ranta, L. 2002. The role of learners' language analytic ability in the communicative classroom' in Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 159-80.
67. Redeker, G. 1990. 'Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure,' Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367-81.
68. Robinson, P. 1995a. 'Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis,' Language Learning 45: 283-331.
69. Robinson, P. 1995b. 'Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9). Honolulu, HI; University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 303-57.
70. Robinson, P. 1996. 'Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27-67.
71. Robinson, P. 1997. 'Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning,' Language Learning 47: 45-99.
72. Robinson, P. 2002a. 'Introduction: Researching individual differences and instructed learning' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1-10.
73. Robinson, P. 2002b. 'Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113-33.
74. Robinson, P. 2002c. 'Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield and Hernstadt (1991)' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211-66.
75. Rosa, E. and M. O'Neill. 1999. 'Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 511-56.
76. Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning,' Applied Linguistics 11: 129-58.
77. Schmidt, R. 1993. 'Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics' in G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds): Interlanguage Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 21-42.
78. Schmidt, R. 1994. 'Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics,' AILA Review 11:11-26.
79. Schmidt, R. 1995. 'Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning' in R. Schmidt (ed.): Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (Technical Report #9). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, pp. 1-63.
80. Schmidt, R. 2001. 'Attention' in P. Robinson (ed.): Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-32.
81. Schmidt, R. and S. Frota. 1986. 'Developing basic conversational ability in a second language' in R. Day (ed.): Talking to Learn. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 237-326.
82. Schmidt, R. and Y. Watanabe. 2001. 'Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning' in Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds): Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical report #23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 313-59.
83. Schmidt, R., D. Boraie, and O. Kassabgy. 1996. 'Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections' in R. Oxford (ed.): Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the New Century (Technical report #11). Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 9-70.
84. Simard, D. and W. Wong. 2001. 'Alertness, orientation, and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 103-24.
85. Skehan,P. 1991. 'Individual differences in second-language learning,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 275-98.
86. Skehan, P. 2002. Theorising and updating aptitude' in P. Robinson (ed.): Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69-93.
87. Sugimori, M. 1998. 'Gengo kyoiku shisutemu kenkyushitsu no konnendo no kadai to kenkyu katsudo' in Ritsumeikan Daigaku Gengo Kyoiku Kenkyu Center/Gengo Komyunikeishon Center (ed.); Center News. Ritsumeikan University, pp. 3-11.
88. Swain, M. 1993. The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough,' The Canadian Modern Language Review 50: 158-64.
89. Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning' in G. Cook and B. Seidlhoffer (eds): Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125-44.
90. Swain, M. 1998. 'Focus on form through conscious reflection' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds): Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64-81.
91. Takahashi, S. 1987. A contrastive Study of Indirectness Exemplified in L1 Directive Speech Acts Performed by Americans and Japanese. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
92. Takahashi, S. 1996. 'Pragmatic transferability,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 189-223.
93. Takahashi, S. 2001. The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171-99.
94. Takahashi, S. 2002. Exploring the Sources of Communication Breakdown: Native Speaker Reactions to the Errors Produced by Japanese Learners of English. Paper submitted to the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 1999-2001).
95. Takahashi, S. and M. DuFon. 1989. Crosslinguistic Influence in Indirectness: The Case of English Directives Performed by Native Japanese Speakers. Unpublished manuscript, Department of English as a Second Language, University of Hawaii at Manoa. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 439).
96. Takahashi, T. and L. M. Beebe. 1987. The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English,' JALT Journal 8: 131-55.
97. Tanaka, N. 1988. 'Politeness: Some problems for Japanese speakers of English,' JALT Journal 9: 81-102.
98. Tateyama, Y. 2001. 'Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen' in K. R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds): Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200-22.
99. Tateyama, Y., G. Kasper, L. Mui, H. Tay, and O. Thananart. 1997. 'Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatics routines' in L. Bouton (ed.): Pragmatics and Language Learning, Vol. 8. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 163-78.
100. Tomlin, R. S. and V. Villa. 1994. 'Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 183-203.
101. Trosborg, A. 1987. 'Apology strategies in natives/non-natives,' Journal of Pragmatics 11: 147-67.
102. Truscott, J. 1998. 'Noticing in second language acquisition: A. critical review,' Second Language Research 14: 103-35.
103. Ushioda, E. 2001. 'Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking' in Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds): Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (Technical report #23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, pp. 93-125.
104. Wong, W. 2001. 'Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 345-68.