Input processing in second language acquisition

Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 5-31

  VanPatten, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917245636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610195     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Allen, L.Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: An experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 69-84.
2. Anderson, J.R. (2000). Learning and memory (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Barcroft, J., & VanPatten, B. (1997). Acoustic salience of grammatical forms:The effect of location, stress, and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. In A.T.Pérez-Leroux & W.R.Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2, Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 109-121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
4. Blau, E.K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 746-753.
5. Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On methods and models for discovering learners' processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1-14.
6. Clifton, C.Jr., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (Eds.). (1994). Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
7. Grain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In C. Clifton, Jr., L.Frazier & K.Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 443-467). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
8. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C., & Corley, M.M.B. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M.Carreiras, J.E.García-Albea & N.Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
9. DeKeyser, R.M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.
10. DeKeyser, R.M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C.Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. DeKeyser, R.M., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction: A response to Bill VanPatten's "Update." Language Learning, 52, 805-823.
12. Ellis, N. (Ed.). (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with commentaries. Special issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24.
13. Ervin-Tripp, S.M. (1974). Is second language learning really like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111-127.
14. Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274.
15. Fernández, E. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition:some preliminary results. In E.Klein and G.Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second langauge grammars: A generative approach (pp. 217-239). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Gass, S.M. (1989). How do learners resolve linguistic conflicts? In S.Gass & J.Schacter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 183-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gass, S.M. (1990). Second and foreign language learning: Same, different, or none of the above? In B.VanPatten & J.F.Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 34-44) Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
18. Gass, S.M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
19. Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
20. Harrington, M. (2001). Sentence processing. In P.Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 91-124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hatch, E. (1983). Simplified input and second language acquisition. In R.W. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition (pp. 64-88). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in Wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
23. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension:Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
24. Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M.H. (1991). Introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
27. Lee, J.F. (1987a). The Spanish subjunctive: An information processing perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 71, 50-57.
28. Lee, J.F. (1987b). Morphological factors influencing pronominal reference assignment by learners of Spanish. In T.A.Morgan, J.F.Lee & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 221-232). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
29. Lee, J.F., Cadierno, T., Glass, W.R., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing tense in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1-23.
30. LoCoco, V. (1987). Learner comprehension of oral and written sentences in German and Spanish: The importance of word order. In B.VanPatten, T. R.Dvorak & J.F.Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 119-129). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
31. Long, M.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S.M. Gass & C.Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. MacWhinney, B. (1997). SLA and the Competition Model. In A.M.B.de Groot & J.F.Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 113-142). Mahway, NJ:Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
33. Mangubhai, F. (1991). The processing behaviors of adult second language learners and their relationship to second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 12, 268-297.
34. Musumeci, D. (1989). The ability of second language learners to assign tense at the sentence level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
35. Ortega, L., & Long, M.H. (1997). The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65-86.
36. Pashler, H.E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Peters, A.M. (1985). Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D.I.Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol 2. (pp. 1029-1067). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
38. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
39. Pondea, L., & Wong, W. (2003). Assigning tense at the sentence level in second language acquisition. Unpublished manuscript. The Ohio State University.
40. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1998). Effects of stress and location on acoustic salience at the initial stages of Spanish L2 input processing. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 24-52.
41. Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
42. Schmidt, R.W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R.W.Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
43. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-274.
44. Slobin, D.I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C.Ferguson & D.I.Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175-208), New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
45. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C.Doughty & J.Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Terrell, T. (1986). Acquisition in the natural approach: The binding/access framework. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 213-227.
47. Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in the communicative approach. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 52-63.
48. VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners' comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67.
49. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
50. VanPatten, B. (1997). On the relevance of input processing to second language acquisition theory and second language instruction. In A.T.Pérez-Leroux & W.R.Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish:Vol. 2. Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 93-108). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
51. VanPatten, B. (2002a). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
52. VanPatten, B. (2002b), Processing instruction, prior awareness, and the nature of second language acquisition: A (partial) response to Batstone. Language Awareness, 11, 240-258.
53. VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill
54. VanPatten, B, (forthcoming). Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. In B.VanPatten, J.Williams, S.Rott & M.Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition.
55. VanPatten, B., & Houston, T. (1998). Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 53-70.
56. Wolvin, A.D., & Coakley, C.G. (1985). Listening, 2nd edition. Dubuque, IA:William C.Brown Publishers.
57. Wong Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.