Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development

Language Learning

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 713-738

  Jung, Euen Hyuk ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10444238045     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00284.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bland, S. (1981). Topic/comment sentences in English. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 32-49.
2. Chafe, W. (1980). The Pear Stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. Chen, P. (1984). A discourse analysis of third person zero anaphora in Chinese. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
4. Cho, S. W. (1994). The grammar of null arguments and mood categories in early child Korean. In Y. K. Kim (Ed.), Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics (pp. 443-462). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
5. Choi, S. Y. (1984). Cuceyhwa-wa cukyekcosa: cosa nun kwa ka lul cungsimulo [A contrastive analysis of Korean postpositions -nun and -ka]. Language Research, 20, 233-250.
6. Choi, S. Y. (1986). Solving the problem of the Korean topic/subject particles nun and ka: A paradigm and a text analysis. Linguistics, 24, 351-369.
7. Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330.
8. Eckman, F. (1985). Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 517-527.
9. Fuller, J. W., & Gundel, J. K. (1987). Topic-prominence in interlanguage. Language Learning, 37(1), 1-17.
10. Green, C. (1996). The origins and effects of topic-prominence in Chinese-English interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34(2), 119-135.
11. Heubner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Koronma.
12. Huang, C. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531-544.
13. Hwang, M. O. (1983). Topic continuity and discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 3, 47-75.
14. Jin, H. G. (1994). Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44(1), 101-122.
15. Kim, H. K. (1988). Hankwuk E1 [The Korean language 1]. Seoul, Korea: Korea University Folk Culture Research Center.
16. Kim, H. Y. (1987). A discourse analysis of some conjunctive morphemes in Korean spoken narrative. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
17. Kim, H. Y. (1989). Nominal reference in discourse: Introduction and tracking referents in Korean spoken narratives. In S. Kuno (Ed.), Proceedings of Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.
18. Kim, H. Y. (1997). Referential choice for third persons in Korean conversation. Tamhwawa Iinci [Discourse and Cognition], 4, 121-158.
19. Kim, K. (2000). An analysis of Korean topic constructions in story-telling contexts with reference to English left-dislocation. Journal of Sociolinguistic Society of Korea, 8, 139-166.
20. Kim, M. (1994). Referential management and activated memory in Korean discourse. Text, 14, 5-21.
21. Kim, M. (2001). Thematic structure of narrative and the choice of particle nun in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 26, 1-20.
22. Kim, Y. J. (1998). The acquisition of Korean. In D., I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 336-444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Kuno, S. (1978). The structure of Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Lee, I., & Ramsey, S. (2000). The Korean language. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25. Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457-489). New York: Academic Press.
26. Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Munoz, C. (1995). Markedness and the acquisition of the referential forms: The case of zero anaphora. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 517-527.
28. Nishimura, M. (1989). The topic-comment construction in Japanese-English code-switching. World Englishes, 8(3), 365-377.
29. Ree, J. (1974). Topic in Korean syntax with notes to Japanese. Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University Press.
30. Rutherford, W. (1983). Language typology and language transfer. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 358-470). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Sasaki, M. (1990). Topic prominence in Japanese EFL students' existential constructions. Language Learning, 40(3), 337-368.
32. Schachter, J., & Rutherford, W. (1979). Discourse functions and language transfer. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 1-12.
33. Sohn, H. M. (1980). Theme-prominence in Korean. Korean Linguistics, 2, 1-19.
34. Wang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2, 221-254.
35. Xiao, Y. (2002). The syntactic development of school-age Chinese-speaking children learning English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 235-271.
36. Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (1995). I-interlanguage and typology: The case of topic-prominence. In E. Lynn, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 17-30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
37. Yoon, S. S. (1988). Hankwuk E 2 [The Korean language 2]. Seoul, Korea: Korea University Folk Culture Research Center.
38. Youn, C. (1990). A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.
39. Yuan, B. (1995). Acquisition of base-generated topics by English-speaking learners of Chinese. Language Learning, 45(4), 567-603.