Stable and developmental optionality in native and non-native Hungarian grammars

Second Language Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 173-200

  Papp, Szilvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992884479     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026765800666966395     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adger, D. 1996: Economy and optionality: interpretations of subjects in Italian.York Papers in Linguistics 17, 1–21.
2. Bard, E.G., Robertson, D. and Sorace, A. 1996: Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability.Language 72, 32–68.
3. Beck, M. 1996: The status of verb-raising among English-speaking learners of German. In Kellerman, E., Weltens, E. and Bongaerts, T., editors, EuroSLA 6: A selection of papers, Amsterdam: TTWiA, 23–33.
4. Beck, M. 1998: L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the Local Impairment Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 311–348.
5. Birdsong, D. 1992: Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68, 706–755.
6. Bley-Vroman, R.W., Felix, S.W. and Ioup, G.L. 1988: The accessibility of Universal Grammar in adult language learning.Second Language Research 4, 1–32.
7. Boersma, P. 1998:Functional phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. University of Amsterdam, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
8. Bródy, M. 1990: Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian.UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 201–221.
9. Bródy, M. 1995: Focus and checking theory. In Kenesei, I., editor,Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 5. Szeged: JATE, 29–43.
10. Burzio, L. 1986:Italian syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Chomsky, N. 1995:The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Clark, R. and Roberts, I. 1993: A computational model of language learnability and language change.Linguistic Inquiry 24, 299–345.
13. Cook, V.J. 1991: The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi competence.Second Language Research 7, 103–117.
14. Cook, V.J. 1992: Evidence for multicompetence.Language Learning 42, 557–591.
15. Coppieters, R. 1987: Competence differences between natives and fluent non-native speakers.Language 63, 544–573.
16. Cowart, W. 1997:Experimental syntax: applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. DeGraff, M. 1996: UG and acquisition in pidginization and creolization. Brain and Behavioural Sciences 19, 723–724.
18. E. Kiss, K. 1995: NP movement, operator movement, and scrambling in Hungarian. In É. Kiss, K., editor,Discourse configurational languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 207–243.
19. É. Kiss, K. 1998a: Identificational focus versus information focus.Language 74, 245–273.
20. É. Kiss, K. 1998b: Multiple topic, one focus? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45, 1–12.
21. Eubank, L. 1993/94: On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development.Language Acquisition 3, 183–208.
22. Eubank, L. 1994: Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors,Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 369–388.
23. Eubank, L. and Grace, S. 1996: Where's the mature language? Where's the native language? In Stringfellow, A. et al., editors,BUCLD 20 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 189–200.
24. Eubank, L. and Grace, S. 1998: V-to-I and inflection in non-native grammars. In Beck, M., editor,Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 69–88.
25. Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P. and West, C. 1997: ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: thematic verb-raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6, 171–199.
26. Fukui, N. 1993: Parameters and optionality.Linguistic Inquiry 24, 399–420.
27. Gibson, E. and Wexler, K. 1994: Triggers.Linguistic Inquiry 25, 407–454.
28. Grimshaw, J. and Samek-Lodovici, V. 1995: Optimal subjects. In Beckman, J., Urbanczyk, S. and Walsh, L., editors,Papers on Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, 598–605.
29. Haegeman, L. 1994:Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Hawkins, R. and Chan, C.Y. 1997: The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’.Second Language Research 13, 187–226.
31. Hayes, B.P. 1997: Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. Ms.To appear in Dekkers, J.,et al., editors,Conceptual studies in Optimality Theory, UCLA.
32. Henry, A. 1995:Belfast English and Standard English: dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Henry, A. and Tangney, D. 1996: Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of Irish. In Stringfellow, A.,et al., editors,BUCLD 20 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 318–327.
34. Ioup, G., Boustaqui, E., Tigi, M.E. and Moselle, M. 1994: Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: a case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment.Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 73–98.
35. Johnson, J.S., Shenkman, K.D., Newport, E.L. and Medin, D.L. 1996: Indeterminacy in the grammar of adult language learners.Journal of Memory and Language 35, 335–352.
36. Kenesei, I. 1989: Logikus-e a magyar szórend? In Telegdi, Zs. and Kiefer, F., editors,Altalános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 105–152.
37. Kenesei, I. 1993: A minimalist program for the syntax of focus. Unpublished manuscript, Szeged: JATE.
38. Klein, W. 1986:Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Kroch, A.S. 1989a: Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do. In Fasold, R.W. and Schiffrin, D., editors,Language change and variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133–172.
40. Kroch, A.S. 1989b: Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.
41. Langer, N. 1995: Scrambling is not optional.Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 125–145.
42. Lardiere, D. 1997: Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University.
43. Lardiere, D. 1998: Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state.Second Language Research 14, 1–25.
44. Lightfoot, D. 1991:How to set parameters: arguments from language change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Lightfoot, D. 1995: Why UG needs a learning theory: triggering verb movement. In Battye, A. and Roberts, I., editors,Clause structure and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31–52.
46. Lightfoot, D. 1999:The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Morgan, J.L. 1972: Verb agreement as a rule of English. In Pernateau, P.M., Levi, J.M. and Phares, G. C., editors,Papers from the eighth regional meeting, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 278–286.
48. Muxí, I. 1995: Optional participial agreement in Barcelonian Catalan. Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 197–210.
49. Papp, S. 1998: The acquisition of Hungarian negation,wh-questions and focus by L1 and adult L2 learners. In de Groot, C. and Kenesei, I., editors,Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 6. Szeged: JATE, 253–280.
50. Papp, S. 1999: The acquisition of focus by adult English learners of Hungarian: evidence for optionality in mature and developing grammars. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
51. Pearce, E. 1995: V-movement and optionality.Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 30–37.
52. Pesetsky, D. 1997: Optimality Theory and syntax: movement and pronunciation. In Archangeli, D. and Langendoen, D.T., editors, Optimality Theory: an overview, Oxford: Blackwell, 134–170.
53. Pettiward, A. 1997: Movement and optionality in syntax. Unpublished PhD thesis, SOAS, London.
54. Pintzuk, S. 1993: Verb seconding in Old English: verb movement to Infl. Linguistic Review 10, 5–35.
55. Pintzuk, S. 1995: Variation and change in Old English clause structure.Language Variation and Change 7, 229–260.
56. Pintzuk, S. 1996: From OV to VO in the history of English. In Dufresne, M. and Dupuis, F., editors,Papers from the fourth diachronic generative syntax conference, Montreal, October 1995, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Poole, G. 1996: Optional movement in the Minimalist Program. In Abraham, W., Epstein, S.D., Thráinsson, H. and Zwart, C.J., editors, Minimal ideas: syntactic studies in the minimalist framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. Puskás, G. 1996:Word order in Hungarian: the syntax of A-positions. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Geneva.
59. Robertson, D. 1996: The Neg-Criterion in second language acquisition: evidence for a dissociation between function and syntax. In Stringfellow, A.,et al., editors,BUCLD 20 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 622–633.
60. Robertson, D. and Sorace, A. 1999: Losing the V2 constraint. In Klein, E. and Martohardjono, G., editors,The development of second language grammars: a generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Santorini, B. 1992: Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 595–640.
62. Santorini, B. 1995: Two types of verb second in the history of Yiddish. In Battye, A. and Roberts, I., editors,Clause structure and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–79.
63. Schachter, J. 1989: Testing a proposed universal. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J., editors,Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–88.
64. Schachter, J. 1990: On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 6, 93–124.
65. Schütze, C.T. 1996:The empirical base of linguistics: grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66. Smith, N.V. and Tsimpli, I.M. 1991: Linguistic modularity? A case study of a ‘savant’ linguist.Lingua 84, 315–351.
67. Smith, N.V. and Tsimpli, I.M. 1995:The mind of a savant: language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Sorace, A. 1993: Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian.Second Language Research 9, 22–47.
69. Sorace, A. 1996: The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In Ritchie, W.C. and Bhatia, T.K., editors,The handbook of second language acquisition, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 375–409.
70. Sprouse, R.A. and Vance, B. 1999: An explanation for the decline of null pronouns in certain Germanic and Romance languages. In DeGraff, M., editor,Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Szalamin, E. 1991: A mai magyar beszélt nyelv mondattanának kérdéséhez.Magyar Nyelv 74, 293–303.
72. Tsimpli, I.M. 1996: Resumptive pronouns, learnability and L2A: a minimalist account.Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 3, Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics: University of Cambridge, 23–42.
73. Tsimpli, I.M. and Roussou, A. 1991: Parameter-resetting in L2? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 149–169.
74. Varga, L. 1981: A magyar intonació funkcionális szempontból. Nyelvtudományi közlemények 83, 313–339.
75. Wexler, K. 1994: Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, D. and Hornstein, N., editors,Verb movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–350.
76. White, L. 1990/91: The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition.Language Acquisition 1, 337–360.
77. White, L. 1992: Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37, 273–286.
78. White, L. and Genesee, F. 1996: How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in second language acquisition.Second Language Research 12, 233–265.
79. Zolnai, G. 1926: Mondatátszövo[.second]dés. Értekezések a nyelvés széptudományok körébo[.second]l XIV/8.