Simple Thiazocine-2-acetic Acid Derivatives via Ring-Closing Metathesis

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2750-2754

  Bates, Dallas K ^a   Li, Xiaofen ^a   Jog, Parag V ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITION REACTIONS; DERIVATIVES; OLEFINS; OXIDATION; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

CYCLIZATION; RING-CLOSING METATHESIS (RCM);

ACETIC ACID;

1 [[4 [4 (METHYLPHENYL)SULFONYL] 3,4,5,8 TETRAHYDRO 2H 1,4 THIAZOCIN 2 YL]ACETYL] 1H INDOLE; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALKENE; ALLYL COMPOUND; AZOCINE DERIVATIVE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; SULFIDE; SULFONE; SULFOXIDE; THIAZOCINE SULFOXIDE; THIOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; [4 (1H INDOL 1 YL) 4 OXOBUTYL] 4 METHYLBENZENESULFONAMIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CYCLIZATION; DEOXYGENATION; DEPROTECTION REACTION; OXIDATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; RING CLOSING METATHESIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 1842689070     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo035692z     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Chalmers, T. M.; Pohl, J. E. F.; Platt, D. S. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1969, 28, 590-594.
2. (a) Caron, S.; Vazquez, E.; Stevens, R. W.; Nakao, K.; Koike, H.; Murata, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4104-4107.
3. (b) Kreft, A. F.; Caufield, C. E.; Failli, A. A.; Caggiano, T. J.; Greenfield, A. A.; Kubrak, D. M. U. S. Patent 5776967, 1998; Chem. Abstr. 129, 122569.
4. (c) Jin, F.; Confalone, P. N. U. S. Patent 5668159, 1997; Chem. Abstr. 127, 293226.
5. George, C. F. P. Lancet 2001, 358, 1623-1626.
6. (a) Sanderson, P. E. J.; Cutrona, K. J.; Savage, K. L.; Naylor-Olsen, A. M.; Bickel, D. J.; Bohn, D. L.; Clayton, F. C.; Krueger, J. A.; Lewis, S. D.; Lucas, B. J.; Lyle, E. A.; Wallace, A. A.; Welsh, D. C.; Yan, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1441-1444.
7. (b) Kanter, J.; Marlowe, C.; Mullins, J. J. G.; Pandey, A.; Scarborough, R.; Butke, G.; Jacobsen, B.; Walker, D. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2001092249, 2001; Chem. Abstr. 136, 20015.
8. (a) Reddy, R. R.; Reddy, T. M.; Reddy, V. M. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1998, 7, 185-188.
9. (b) Mylari, B. L.; Zembrowski, W. J.; Beyer, T. A.; Aldinger, C. E.; Siegel, T. W. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 2155-2162.
10. Tatsuta, K.; Kurita, Y. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho 05074047, 1993; Chem. Abstr. 119, 138980).
11. Duan J. J.-W.; Lu, Z.; Xue, C.-B.; He, X.; Seng, J. L.; Roderick, J. J.; Wasserman, Z. R.; Liu, R.-Q.; Covington, M. B.; Magolda, R. L.; Newton, R. C.; Trzaskos, J. M.; Decicco, C. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2035-2040.
12. Campbell, M. M. U. S. Patent 4582907, 1986; Chem. Abstr. 105, 78924.
13. Oishi, T.; Nagumo, Y.; Shoji, M.; LeBrazidec, J.-Y.; Uehara, H.; Hirama, M. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2035-2036.
14. (a) Crimmins, M. T.; Emmitte, K. A. Synthesis 2000, 899-903.
15. (b) Evans, P. A.; Roseman, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2252-2253.
16. (c) Holmes, C. P.; Bartlett, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 98-108.
17. Nitrogen systems (B) appear in natural products: Bardou, A.; Celerier, J.-P.; Lhommet, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5189-5192.
18. (a) Shimizu, K.; Takimoto, M.; Mori, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2323-2325.
19. (b) Vares, L.; Rein, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7226-7237 and references therein.
20. (c) Kuo, S.-C.; Blythin, D. J.; Kreutner, W. U. S. Patent 5929236, 1999; Chem. Abstr. 131, 116239.
21. (d) Banwell, M. G.; Bui, C. T.; Pham, H. T. T.; Simpson, G. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 967-969.
22. (e) Srinivasan, A.; Lyle, L. R.; Rajagopalan, R. WO Patent 9603429, 1996; Chem. Abstr. 125, 59147.
23. (f) Kuo, S.-C.; Blythin, D. J.; Kreutner, W. WO Patent 9422843, 1994; Chem. Abstr. 122, 81384.
24. (g) Bunce, R. A.; Bennett, M. J. Synth. Commun. 1993, 23, 1009-1020.
25. (h) Desmaele, D.; Pain, G.; D'Angelo, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1992, 3, 863-866.
26. (i) Bunce, R. A.; Peeples, C. J.; Jones, B. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1727-1733.
27. (j) Tsutomu, T. Aust. J. Chem. 1986, 39, 503-510.
28. For a somewhat related radical-based approach, see: Navarro-Vazquez, A.; Garcia, A.; Dominguez, D. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3213-3220.
29. (a) O'Brien, P.; Porter, D. W.; Smith, N. M. Synlett 2000, 1336-1338.
30. (b) Enders, D.; Wiedemann, J. Liebigs Ann./Recueil 1997, 699-706.
31. 2COOH": (a) Takeuchi, Y.; Azuma, K.; Oshige, M.; Abe, H.; Nishioka, H.; Sasaki, K.; Harayama, T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1639-1646.
32. (b) Okitsu, O.; Suzuki, R.; Kobayashi, S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 809-823 and references therein.
33. (c) Dixon, D. J.; Ley, S. V.; Tate, E. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1829-1836.
34. (d) Hayashi, M.; Sugiyama, M.; Toba, T.; Oguni, N. Chem. Commun. 1990, 767-768.
35. (e) Homma, K.; Takenoshita, H.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 1898-1915.
36. (f) Nagasaka, T.; Koseki, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Yasuda, Y.; Hamaguchi, F. Yakugaku Zasshi 1989, 109, 823-826; Chem. Abstr. 112, 216668.
37. (f) Nagasaka, T.; Koseki, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Yasuda, Y.; Hamaguchi, F. Yakugaku Zasshi 1989, 109, 823-826; Chem. Abstr. 112, 216668.
38. For a review, see: Maier, M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2073-2077.
39. See also (a) Papaioannou, N.; Blank, J. T.; Miller, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2728-2734.
40. (b) Hoffmann, T.; Waibel, R.; Gmeiner, P. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 62-69.
41. (c) Clark, J. S.; Middleton, M. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 765-768.
42. (d) Boyer, F.-D.; Hanna, I.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4094-4096.
43. (e) Creighton, C. J.; Reitz, A. B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 893-895.
44. For a review of the difficulties of medium size ring synthesis via standard cyclization methodologies, see: Illuminati, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95. Following the general trend for cyclane formation (Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, 1994; pp 678-684) cyclic thialkanes and thiazalkanes (MaGee, D. I.; Beck, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8367-8371) containing eight- or nine-membered rings form in very low yield by treatment of the corresponding alkyl dibromides with sodium sulfide nonahydrate. Some simple cyclic 1,4-thiazepines are available from tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (Beckmann rearrangement of the derived oxime followed by amide reduction) (Doi, J. T.; Musker, W. K.; deLeeuw, D. L.; Hirschon, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1239-1243), and eight-, nine-, and ten-ring atom oxathiacycloalkenes are available by ring expansion of halo-O,S-acetals (Coster, M. J.; DeVoss, J. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3047-3050.).
45. For a review of the difficulties of medium size ring synthesis via standard cyclization methodologies, see: Illuminati, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95. Following the general trend for cyclane formation (Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, 1994; pp 678-684) cyclic thialkanes and thiazalkanes (MaGee, D. I.; Beck, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8367-8371) containing eight- or nine-membered rings form in very low yield by treatment of the corresponding alkyl dibromides with sodium sulfide nonahydrate. Some simple cyclic 1,4-thiazepines are available from tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (Beckmann rearrangement of the derived oxime followed by amide reduction) (Doi, J. T.; Musker, W. K.; deLeeuw, D. L.; Hirschon, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1239-1243), and eight-, nine-, and ten-ring atom oxathiacycloalkenes are available by ring expansion of halo-O,S-acetals (Coster, M. J.; DeVoss, J. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3047-3050.).
46. For a review of the difficulties of medium size ring synthesis via standard cyclization methodologies, see: Illuminati, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95. Following the general trend for cyclane formation (Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, 1994; pp 678-684) cyclic thialkanes and thiazalkanes (MaGee, D. I.; Beck, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8367-8371) containing eight- or nine-membered rings form in very low yield by treatment of the corresponding alkyl dibromides with sodium sulfide nonahydrate. Some simple cyclic 1,4-thiazepines are available from tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (Beckmann rearrangement of the derived oxime followed by amide reduction) (Doi, J. T.; Musker, W. K.; deLeeuw, D. L.; Hirschon, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1239-1243), and eight-, nine-, and ten-ring atom oxathiacycloalkenes are available by ring expansion of halo-O,S-acetals (Coster, M. J.; DeVoss, J. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3047-3050.).
47. For a review of the difficulties of medium size ring synthesis via standard cyclization methodologies, see: Illuminati, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95. Following the general trend for cyclane formation (Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, 1994; pp 678-684) cyclic thialkanes and thiazalkanes (MaGee, D. I.; Beck, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8367-8371) containing eight- or nine-membered rings form in very low yield by treatment of the corresponding alkyl dibromides with sodium sulfide nonahydrate. Some simple cyclic 1,4-thiazepines are available from tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (Beckmann rearrangement of the derived oxime followed by amide reduction) (Doi, J. T.; Musker, W. K.; deLeeuw, D. L.; Hirschon, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1239-1243), and eight-, nine-, and ten-ring atom oxathiacycloalkenes are available by ring expansion of halo-O,S-acetals (Coster, M. J.; DeVoss, J. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3047-3050.).
48. For a review of the difficulties of medium size ring synthesis via standard cyclization methodologies, see: Illuminati, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95. Following the general trend for cyclane formation (Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, 1994; pp 678-684) cyclic thialkanes and thiazalkanes (MaGee, D. I.; Beck, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8367-8371) containing eight- or nine-membered rings form in very low yield by treatment of the corresponding alkyl dibromides with sodium sulfide nonahydrate. Some simple cyclic 1,4-thiazepines are available from tetrahydrothiopyran-4-one (Beckmann rearrangement of the derived oxime followed by amide reduction) (Doi, J. T.; Musker, W. K.; deLeeuw, D. L.; Hirschon, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1239-1243), and eight-, nine-, and ten-ring atom oxathiacycloalkenes are available by ring expansion of halo-O,S-acetals (Coster, M. J.; DeVoss, J. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3047-3050.).
49. For examples of RCM failures with Grubbs' Gen 1 catalyst on sulfur-containing compounds, see: (a) Fuerstner, A.; Seidel, G.; Kindler, N. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8215-8230.
50. (b) Armstrong, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 371-388.
51. (c) Bujard, M.; Gouverneur, V.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2119-2123.
52. (d) Mascarenas, J. L.; Rumbo, A.; Castedo, L. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8620-8621.
53. For successful application of Mo-based catalysts to sulfur(II) compounds, see: (a) Armstrong, S. K.; Christie, B. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9373-9376.
54. (b) Barrett, A. G. M.; Baugh, S. P. D.; Gibson, V. C.; Giles, M. R.; Marshall, E. L.; Procopiou, P. A. Chem. Commun. 1997, 155-156.
55. (c) Shon, Y.-S.; Lee, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1283-1286. For examples of sulfur(II)-tolerant W-based catalysts, see: Couturier, J. L.; Tanaka, K.; Leconte, M.; Basset, J. M.; Ollivier, J. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1993, 74, 383-384.
56. (c) Shon, Y.-S.; Lee, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1283-1286. For examples of sulfur(II)-tolerant W-based catalysts, see: Couturier, J. L.; Tanaka, K.; Leconte, M.; Basset, J. M.; Ollivier, J. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1993, 74, 383-384.
57. (a) Spagnol, G.; Heck, M.-P.; Nolan, S. P.; Mioskowski, C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1767-1770.
58. (b) Smulik, J. A.; Giessert, A. J.; Diver, S. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 209-211.
59. (c) Moore, J. D.; Sprott, K. T.; Hanson, P. R. Synlett 2001, 605-608.
60. (d) Garbaccio, R. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3127-3129.
61. (a) Michrowska, A.; Bieniek, M.; Kim, M.; Klajn, R.; Grela, K. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 4525-4531.
62. (b) Yao, Q. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 427-430.
63. (c) Basu, K.; Cabral, J. A.; Paquette, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5453-5456.
64. (d) Grela, K.; Bieniek, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6425-6428.
65. (e) Randl, S.; Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1796-1797.
66. (f) Blackwell, H. E.; O'Leary, D. J.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Wasenfelder, R. A.; Busmann, D. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 58-71.
67. (g) Paquette, L. A.; Fabris, F.; Tae, J.; Gallucci, J. C.; Hofferberth, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3391-3398.
68. (h) Fuerstner, A.; Ackermann, L. Chem. Commun. 1999, 95-96.
69. (i) Chatterjee, A. K.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1751-1753.
70. (j) Fuerstner, A.; Gastner, T.; Weintritt, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2361-2366.
71. (k) Miller, J. F.; Termin, A.; Koch, K.; Piscopio, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3158-3159.
72. (a) Wanner, J.; Harned, A. M.; Probst, D. A.; Poon, K. W. C.; Klein, T. A.; Snelgrove, K. A.; Hanson, P. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 917-921.
73. (b) Yao, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3896-3898.
74. (c) Long, D. D.; Termin, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6743-6747.
75. (d) Lane, C.; Snieckus, V. Synlett 2000, 1294-1296.
76. (e) Hanson, P. R.; Probst, D. A.; Robinson, R. E.; Yau, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4761-4764.
77. (f) Paquette, L. A.; Leit, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8126-8927.
78. (g) Fuerstner, A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1315-1316.
79. (h) Cerezo, S.; Cortes, J.; Moreno-Manus, M.; Pleixats, R.; Roglans, A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 14869-14884.
80. (i) Visser, M. S.; Heron, N. M.; Didiuk, M. T.; Sagal, J. F.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4291-4298.
81. Sulfonates: Karsch, S.; Schwab, P.; Metz, P. Synlett 2002, 2019-2022.
82. Paquette, L. A.; Fabris, F.; Tae, J.; Gallucci, J. C.; Hofferberth, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3391-3398. Also see: Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5416-5419 and references therein.
83. Paquette, L. A.; Fabris, F.; Tae, J.; Gallucci, J. C.; Hofferberth, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3391-3398. Also see: Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5416-5419 and references therein.
84. Ahn, Y. M.; Yang, K.; Georg, G. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1411-1413.
85. Cachoux, F.; Ibrahim-Ouali, M.; Santelli, M. Synlett 2002, 1987-1990.
86. N-Tosyl compounds appear to be superior to alkyl-, benzoyl-, or ethoxycarbonyl-protected amines in RCM processes: (a) Kinderman, S. S.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Schoemaker, H. E.; Hiemstra, H.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2045-2048.
87. (b) van Otterlo, W. A. L.; Pathak, R.; de Konig, C. B. Synlett 2003, 1859-1861.
88. 4 was added to the RCM reaction according to Fuerstner's protocol (Fuerstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9130-9136) and both S-oxidized counterparts to the sulfide (3 and 4) readily undergo RCM]. The problem is more likely due to inactivation of the catalyst by coordination of the Ru to S(II). Coordination/inactivation could occur intermolecularly prior to interaction of the Ru with the olefinic sites or intramolecularly, perhaps as shown in structure i. The latter process (involving coordination of ruthenium to hydroxyl oxygen via a six-membered ring rather than the eight-membered ring as in i) has been suggested previously (for example, Washburn, D. G.; Heidebrecht, R. W.; Martin, S. F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3523-3525) to explain Grubbs' catalyst inactivation. This process seems less likely in the present context because of the size of the ring involved and the necessity to invoke selective reaction of the N-allylic olefinic site, even though the S-allylic olefinic site is sterically and electronically similar.
89. 4 was added to the RCM reaction according to Fuerstner's protocol (Fuerstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9130-9136) and both S-oxidized counterparts to the sulfide (3 and 4) readily undergo RCM]. The problem is more likely due to inactivation of the catalyst by coordination of the Ru to S(II). Coordination/inactivation could occur intermolecularly prior to interaction of the Ru with the olefinic sites or intramolecularly, perhaps as shown in structure i. The latter process (involving coordination of ruthenium to hydroxyl oxygen via a six-membered ring rather than the eight-membered ring as in i) has been suggested previously (for example, Washburn, D. G.; Heidebrecht, R. W.; Martin, S. F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3523-3525) to explain Grubbs' catalyst inactivation. This process seems less likely in the present context because of the size of the ring involved and the necessity to invoke selective reaction of the N-allylic olefinic site, even though the S-allylic olefinic site is sterically and electronically similar.
90. (a) Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3783-3784.
91. (b) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953-956.
92. Bates, D. K.; Xia, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9190-9196.
93. de Oliveira Baptista, M. J. V.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Barton, D. H. R.; Girijavallabhan, M.; Jennings, R. C.; Kelly, J.; Papadimitriou, V. J.; Usher, N. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1477-1500.
94. (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Baran, P. S.; Zhong, Y.-L.; Fong, K. C.; He, Y.; Yoon, W. H.; Choi, H.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1676-1678.
95. (b) Bergman, J.; Carlsson, R.; Misztal, S. Acta Chem. Scand. B 1976, 30, 853-862.
96. (a) Portoghese, P. S.; Telang, V. G. Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 1823-1829.
97. (b) Johnson, C. R.; Diefenbach, H.; Keiser, J. E.; Sharp, J. C. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 5649-5653.
98. For leading references see Jog, P. V.; Brown, R. E.; Bates, D. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8240-8243.
99. Gladysz and co-workers have reported use of a cationic rhenium compound that serves both as a protecting group for S(II) and RCM catalyst for thioethers: Martin-Alvarez, J. M.; Hampel, F.; Arif, A. M.; Gladysz, J. A. Organometallics 1999, 18, 955-957.
100. (a) Bartsch, H.; Erker, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 199-200.
101. (b) Tewari, N.; Kumar, Y.; Thaper, R. K.; Khanna, J. M. Synth. Commun. 1996, 26, 1169-1173.