Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology-based protein structures

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 992-999

  Fan, Hao ^a   Mark, Alan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chaperone; Homology modeling; Molecular dynamics; Protein structure prediction; Structure refinement

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIMULATION;

BACILLUS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA TOPOISOMERASES, TYPE I; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GRAMICIDIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS; VACCINIA VIRUS;

EID: 1842454714     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03449904     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baker, D. and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
2. Berendsen, H.J.C., Postma, J.P.M., van Gunsteren, W.F., and Hermans, J. 1981. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In Intermolecular forces (ed. B. Pullman), pp. 331-342. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
3. Berendsen, H.J.C., Postma, J.P.M., van Gunsteren, W.F., Di Nola, A., and Haak, J.R. 1984. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81: 3684-3690.
4. Berendsen, H.J.C., van der Spoel, D., and van Drunen, R. 1995. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comp. Phys. Comm. 91: 43-56.
5. Betancourt, M.R. and Thirumalai, D. 1999. Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 627-644.
6. Bukau, B. and Horwich, A.L. 1998. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell 92: 351-366.
7. Bycroft, M., Hubbard, T.J., Proctor, M., Freund, S.M., and Murzin, A.G. 1997. The solution structure of the S1 RNA binding domain: A member of an ancient nucleic acid-binding fold. Cell 88: 235-242.
8. Chan, H.S. and Dill, K.A. 1996. A simple model of chaperone-mediated protein folding. Proteins 24: 345-351.
9. Csermely, P. 1999. Chaperone-percolator model: A possible molecular mechanism of Anfinsen-cage-type chaperones. Bioessays 21: 959-965.
10. Daura, X., Jaun, B., Seebach, D., van Gunsteren, W.F., and Mark, A.E. 1998. Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Mol. Biol. 280: 925-932.
11. Eberstadt, M., Huang, B., Chen, Z., Meadows, R.P., Ng, S.C., Zheng, L., Lenardo, M.J., and Fesik, S.W. 1998. NMR structure and mutagenesis of the FADD (Mort1) death-effector domain. Nature 392: 941-945.
12. Fain, B., Xia, Y., and Levitt, M. 2002. Design of an optimal Chebyshev-expanded discrimination function for globular proteins. Proteins Sci. 11: 2010-2021.
13. Fan, H. and Mark, A.E. 2003. Relative stability of protein structures determined by x-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Proteins 53: 111-120.
14. -. 2004. Refinement of homology based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci. 13: 211-220.
15. Feenstra, K.A., Hess, B., and Berendsen, H.J.C. 1999. Improving efficiency of large time-scale molecular dynamics simulations of hydrogen-rich systems. J. Comp. Chem. 20: 786-798.
16. Feig, M. and Brooks III, C.L. 2002. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions. Proteins 49: 232-245.
17. Feldman, D.E. and Frydman, J. 2000. Protein folding in vivo: The importance of molecular chaperones. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 26-33.
18. Felts, A.K., Gallicchio, E., Wallqvist, A., and Levy, R.M. 2002. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the surface generalized born solvent model. Proteins 48: 404-422.
19. Flohil, J.A., Vriend, G., and Berendsen, H.J.C. 2002. Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: Application to targets 47, 58 and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis. Proteins 48: 593-604.
20. Fukunishi, H., Watanabe, O., and Takada, S. 2002. On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. J. Chem. Phys. 116: 9058-9067.
21. Gorse, D. 2002. Application of a chaperone-based refolding method to two- and three-dimensional off-lattice protein models. Biopolymers 64: 146-160.
22. Hartl, F.U. and Martin, J. 1995. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5: 92-102.
23. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H.J.C., and Fraaije, J.G.E.M. 1997. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 18: 1463-1472.
24. Kolinski, A., Rotkiewicz, P., Ilkowski, B., and Skolnick, J. 1999. A method for the improvement of threading-based protein models. Proteins 37: 592-610.
25. α RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and S15. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123: 1040-1046.
26. Lee, M.R., Tsai, J., Baker, D., and Kollman, P.A. 2001b. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 417-430.
27. Lemer, C.M.R., Rooman, M.J., and Wodak, S.J. 1995. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: Evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 23: 337-355.
28. Lindahl, E., Hess, B., and van der Spoel, D. 2001. GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Modeling 7: 306-317.
29. Martin, J. 1998. Protein folding assisted by GroEL/GroES chaperonin system. Biochemistry (Mosc) 63: 374-381.
30. Miyamoto, S. and Kollman, P.A. 1992. SETTLE: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comp. Chem. 13: 952-962.
31. Rao, F. and Caflisch, A. 2003. Replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations of reversible folding. J. Chem. Phys. 119: 4035-4042.
32. Rost, B., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1997. Protein folding recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol. 270: 471-480.
33. Schonbrun, J., Wedemeyer, W.J., and Baker, D. 2002. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 348-354.
34. Sfatos, C.D., Gutin, A.M., Abkevich, V.I., and Shakhnovich, E.I. 1996. Simulations of chaperone-assisted folding. Biochemistry 35: 334-339.
35. Sharma, A., Hanai, R., and Mondragon, A. 1994. Crystal structure of the aminoterminal fragment of vaccinia virus DNA topoisomerase I at 1.6 Å resolution. Structure 2: 767-777.
36. Simmerling, C., Lee, M.R., Ortiz, A.R., Kolinski, A., Skolnick, J., and Kollman, P.A. 2000. Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to predict protein structure from amino acid sequence: Application to the small protein CMTI-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122: 8392-8402.
37. Simons, K.T., Bonneau, R., Ruczinski, I., and Baker, D. 1999. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 37(Suppl 3): 171-176.
38. Simons, K.T., Strauss, C., and Baker, D. 2001. Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 306: 1191-1199.
39. Takagi, F., Koga, N., and Takada, S. 2003. How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 11367-11372.
40. Tironi, I.G., Sperb, R., Smith, P.E., and van Gunsteren, W.F. 1995. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 102: 5451-5459.
41. Todd, M.J., Lorimer, G.H., and Thirumalai, D. 1996. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: Optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 4030-4035.
42. van der Spoel, D., van Buuren, A.R., Apol, E., Meulenhoff, P.J., Tieleman, D.P., Sijbers, A.L.T.M., Hess, B., Feenstra, K.A., Lindahl, E., van Drunen, R., et al. 2001. Gromacs user manual, version 3.0. University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
43. van Gunsteren, W.F., Billeter, S.R., Eising, A.A., Hünenberger, P.H., Krüger, P.K.H.C., Mark, A.E., Scott, W.R.P., and Tironi, I.G. 1996. Biomolecular simulation: The GROMOS96 manual and user guide. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zürich.
44. Vorobjev, Y.N. and Hermans, J. 2001. Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability. Protein Sci. 10: 2498-2506.
45. Vriend, G. 1990. WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8: 52-56.
46. Walter, S. and Buchner, J. 2002. Molecular chaperones: Cellular machines for protein folding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41: 1098-1113.