Repetition Blindness Occurs in Nonwords

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 305-318

  Harris, Catherine L ^a   Morris, Alison L ^b,c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842432512     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.305     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arnell, K. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Repetition blindness for pseudoobject pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 999-1013.
2. Ayçiçegi, A., & Harris, C. L. (2002). How are letters containing diacritics represented? Repetition blindness for Turkish words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 371-382.
3. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
4. Bavelier, D. (1999). Role and nature of object representations in perceiving and acting. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual memories (pp. 151-180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
7. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
8. Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1993). Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 453-466.
9. Campbell, J. I. D., Fugelsang, J. A., & Hernberg, V. D. (2002). Effects of lexicality and distinctiveness on repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 948-962.
10. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice 5 (pp. 1-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Castles, A., Datta, H., Gayan, J., & Olson R. K. (1999). Genetic influences on subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 73-94.
12. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: Implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63, 79-119.
13. Chun, M. M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 738-755.
14. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257-271.
15. Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 226-234.
16. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
17. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
18. Coltheart, V., & Langdon, R. (2003). Repetition blindness for words yet repetition advantage for nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 171-185.
19. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
20. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Harris, C. L. (2001). Are alternating or consecutive letters the unit affected by repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 761-774.
22. Harris, C. L. (2003). Repetition blindness occurs for single letters in nonwords but not words. Unpublished manuscript.
23. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2000). Orthographic repetition blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1039-1060.
24. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2001a). Identity and similarity in repetition blindness: No cross-over interaction. Cognition, 81, 1-40.
25. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2001b). Illusory words created by repetition blindness: A technique for probing sublexical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 118-126.
26. Harris, C. L., Morris, A. L., & Ayçiçegi, A. (2003). Explicit and implicit measures of repetition blindness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Hochhaus, L., & Johnston, J. C. (1996). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 355-366.
28. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
29. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
30. Kanwisher, N. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
31. Kanwisher, N. (2001). Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition, 79, 89-113.
32. Kanwisher, N., Driver, J., & Machado, L. (1995). Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color or shape. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 303-337.
33. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
34. Kanwisher, N., Yin, C., & Wojciulik, E. (1997). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 119-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Luo, C., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064.
36. Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 95-113.
37. Morris, A. L., & Harris, C. L. (1999). A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: Evidence from illusory words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1060-1075.
38. Morris, A. L., & Harris, C. L. (2002). Sentence context, word recognition, and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 962-982.
39. Morris, A. L., & Harris, C. L. (2004). Repetition blindness and attentional guidance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Morris, A. L., & Harris, C. L. (in press). Repetition blindness: Out of sight or out of mind? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
41. Mozer, M. C. (1989). Types and tokens in visual letter perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 287-303.
42. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
43. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Computational principles in quasi-regular domains: Understanding normal and impaired word reading. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
44. Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 91-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
46. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
47. Solso, R. L., & Juel, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 297-343.
48. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-processing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.