Orthographic repetition blindness

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1039-1060

  Harris, Catherine L ^a   Morris, Alison L ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LINGUISTICS; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; READING; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0034324169     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755941     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
2. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M.I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C.L. Giles, S.J. Hanson, & J.D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Bavalier, D., & Jordan, M.I. (1994). Representing words in connectionist networks. Presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.
4. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
5. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
6. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: Implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63, 79-119.
7. Chun, M.M. (1997). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 738-755.
8. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
9. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguist database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
10. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonason, J.T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexical. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Forster, K.I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
12. Francis, W.N., & Kuçera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical-decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244.
14. Harris, C.L., & Morris, A.L. (in press). Illusory words created by repetition blindness: A technique for probing sublexical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
15. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K.M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individual failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
16. Humphreys, G.W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
17. Jacobs, A.M., & Grainger, J. (1991). Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 43-52.
18. Kanwisher, N. (1986). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.
19. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
20. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
21. Marmurek, H.H.C., & Kwantes, P. (1994). Orthographic effects in pseudohomophone naming. Presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
22. Marohn, K.M., & Hochhaus, L. (1988). Different-case repetition still leads to perceptual blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 29-31.
23. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
24. Morris, A.L., & Harris, C.L. (1999). A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: Evidence from illusory words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1060-1075.
25. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
26. Mozer, C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
28. Potter, M.C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1986). Learning the past tense of English verbs. In J.L. McClelland & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
31. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
32. Treiman, R. (1994). To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 91-110.
33. Wickelgren, W.A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associate memory and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1-15.
34. Wilson, M. (1987). MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine usable dictionary. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. Available from http: //www.psy.uwa.edu.au/uwa_mrc.htm