Illusory words created by repetition blindness: A technique for probing sublexical representations

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 118-126

  Harris, Catherine L ^a   Morris, Alison L ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0035294050     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196147     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ARMSTRONG, I. T., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
2. BAVELIER, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
3. BAVELIER, D., & POTTER, M. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 18, 134-147.
4. BAVELIER, D., PRASADA, S., & SEGUI, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
5. CHIALANT, D., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: Implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63, 79-119.
6. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
7. COLTHEART, M., CURTIS, B., ATKINS, P., & HALLER, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8. FAGOT, C., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 275-292.
9. FORSTER, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
10. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. GIBSON, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Science, 148, 1066-1072.
12. GIBSON, E. J. (1971). Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 351-368.
13. GRAINGER, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical-decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.
14. HARRIS, C. L., & MORRIS A. L. (2000). Orthographic repetition blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1039-1060.
15. HOCHHAUS, L., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1996). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 355-366.
16. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & QUINLAN, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
17. JORDAN, T. R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psvchology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 893-909.
18. KANWISHER, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
19. KANWISHER, N., KIM, J. W., & WICKENS, T. D. (1996). Signal detection analysis of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1249-1260.
20. KANWISHER, N., & POTTER, M. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 30-47.
21. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 951-966.
22. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
23. MCCUSKER, L. X., GOUGH, P. B., & BIAS, R. G. (1981). Word recognition inside out and outside in. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 538-551.
24. MORRIS, A. L., & HARRIS, C. L. ( 1999). A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: Evidence from illusory words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1060-1075.
25. MOZER, M. C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 531-546.
26. PARK, J., & KANWISHER, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 500-519.
27. PERFETTI, C. A., & BELL, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 473-485.
28. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-116.
29. PRINZMETAL, W., HOFFMAN, H., & VEST, K. (1991). Automatic processes in word perception: An analysis from illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 902-923.
30. PRINZMETAL, W., TREIMAN, R., & RHO, S. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 461-475.
31. SPOEHR, K. T., & SMITH, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-89.
32. TAFT, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllable structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 21-39.
33. TREIMAN, R. (1994). To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 91-110.
34. VAN DER VELDE, F. (1992). Effect of orthographic preactivation on letter migration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 449-459.
35. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
36. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., DORKEN, M. D., & PODROUZEK, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part 1. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1670-1688.
37. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & PODROUZEK, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part 2. Remembering repetitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1689-1697.
38. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WAI, K. H. (1997). Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": Constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect. Psychological Research, 60, 173-182.