A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: Evidence from illusory words

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1060-1075

  Morris, Alison L ^a   Harris, Catherine L ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; VISION;

HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0033173255     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1060     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
2. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
3. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
4. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
5. Carr, T. H. (1986). Perceiving visual language. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & I. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-92). New York: Wiley.
6. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: Implications for lexical processing. Cognition, 63, 79-119.
7. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonason, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Comic (Ed.), Attention & performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292.
10. Francis, W. N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
12. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (1996, October). Letter clusters unite: Illusory words created by repetition blindness. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
13. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (1997, November). The letter clusters theory of repetition blindness. Poster presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
14. Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (in press). Orthographic repetition blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
15. Hochhaus, L., & Johnston, J. C. (1996). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 355-366.
16. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
17. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
18. Kanwisher, N. (1986). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
19. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
20. Kanwisher, N. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 77, 404-421.
21. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
22. Marohn, K. M., & Hochhaus, L. (1988a). Semantic priming increases and repetition priming decreases apparent stimulus duration. Journal of General Psychology, 115, 51-61.
23. Marohn, K. M., & Hochhaus, L. (1988b). Different-case repetition still leads to perceptual blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 29-31.
24. McClelland, J. L., & Mozer, M. C. (1986). Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: Familiarity and similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 18-35.
25. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
26. Morris, A. L., & Harris, C. L. (1997, March). All those chocolate dandy bars can make you fat: The role of top-down activation in repetition blindness. Poster presented at the 10th Annual City University of New York Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Santa Monica, CA.
27. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
28. Mozer, M. C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 531-546.
29. Mozer, M. C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
31. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Computational principles in quasi-regular domains: Understanding normal and impaired word reading. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
32. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
33. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
34. Treiman, R. (1994). To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 91-110.
35. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 281-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 3-17.
37. Van der Velde, F. (1992). Effect of orthographic preactivation on letter migration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 449-459.
38. Whittlesea, B., Dorken, M. D., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: 1. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1670-1688.