Perceptual Repetition Blindness Effects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 355-366

  Hochhaus, Larry ^a   Johnston, James C ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA HEADQUARTERS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; READING;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 0030114548     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.355     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
2. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffmann.
3. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
4. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1-19.
5. Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1993). Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 453-466.
6. Estes, W. K., & Brunn, J. L. (1987). Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 411-422.
7. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). The locus of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292.
8. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
9. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
10. Hochhaus, L., & Mihura, J. (1992, November). Repetition blindness interacts with word frequency. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
11. Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
12. Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1984). The influence of prior context on word identification: Bias and sensitivity effects. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 243-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
14. Kanwisher, N. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
15. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. C. (1989). Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement. Memory & Cognition, 17, 117-124.
16. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
17. Kersh, B., Mihura, J., & Hochhaus, L. (1994, April). Using d' measures, frequency and repetition blindness do not interact. Poster Session presented at meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Tulsa, OK.
18. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
19. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory of language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer.
20. MacKay, D. G. (1990). Perception, action, and awareness: A three-body problem. In O. Neuman & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 269-303). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
21. Marohn, K. M., & Hochhaus, L. (1988). Different-case repetition still leads to perceptual blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 29-31.
22. McClelland, J. C., & Johnston, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in the perception of words and nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.
23. Miller, G. A. (1964). Mathematics and psychology. New York: Wiley.
24. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
25. Pollack, I., Norman, D. A., & Galanter, E. (1964). An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 1, 327-328.
26. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
27. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Postman, L. (1958, February). Frequency of usage and the perception of words. Science, 27, 263-266.
28. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357-371.
29. Stellman, R., Hochhaus, L., & Stotts, M. (1994). Repetition blindness is a strategy-modifiable process. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Triesman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
31. Whittlesea, B. W. A., Dorken, M. D., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part I. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1670-1688.
32. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.