Temporal and Spatial Repetition Blindness: Effects of Presentation Mode and Repetition Lag on the Perception of Repeated Items

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 95-113

  Luo, Chun R ^a,b,c   Caramazza, Alfonso ^a,b,d  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

^c WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030075942     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.95     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
2. Bavelier, D., & Jordan, M. I. (1992). A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. In C. L. Giles, S. J. Hanson, & J. D. Cowan (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 5, pp. 879-886). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
4. Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
5. Bracewell, R. N. (1978). The Fourier transform and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Crowder, R. G. (1968). Intraserial repetition effects in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 446-451.
7. Egeth, H. E., & Santee, J. L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 506-517.
8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.
10. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
11. Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.
12. Estes, W. K. (1974). Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 53-60.
13. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292.
14. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
15. Hochhaus, L., & Johnston, J. C. (in press). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
16. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. M. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
17. Humphreys, G. W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
18. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., Quinlan, P. T., & Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 105-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
20. Kanwisher, N. G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
21. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990a). Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement. Memory & Cognition, 17, 117-124.
22. Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990b). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
23. Keren, G., & Boer, L. C. (1985). Necessary conditions for repeated-letter inferiority: The role of positional uncertainty. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Martin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 601-612). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064.
25. MacKay, D. G., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Semantic blindness: Repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall under time pressure. Psychological Science, 5, 52-55.
26. Mozer, M. C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 531-546.
27. Mozer, M. C. (1989). Types and tokens in visual letter perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 287-303.
28. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. G. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
29. Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93, 180-206.
30. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1980). Interference in letter identification: A test of feature-specific inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 321-330.
31. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 101-116.
32. Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151-188). New York: Academic Press.
33. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
34. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
35. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1992, November). The attentional blink does not require selection from among a non-target stream. Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
36. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1993, November). Repetition detection and "blindness" in rapid lists: Processing and representation. Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.