Identity and similarity in repetition blindness: No cross-over interaction

Cognition

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-40

  Harris, Catherine L ^a   Morris, Alison L ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity; Repetition blindness; Similarity

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; GLOSSARIES; LINGUISTICS;

REPETITION BLINDNESS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; LANGUAGE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPETITION BLINDNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035041024     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00138-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ariel M. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. 1990;Routledge, London.
2. Armstrong I.T., Mewhort D.J.K. Repetition deficits in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;1044-1052.
3. Bavelier D. Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words. Cognition. 51:1994;199-236.
4. Bavelier D., Jordan M.I. A dynamical model of priming and repetition blindness. Giles C.L., Hanson S.J., Cowan J.D. Advances in neural information processing systems. 1992;Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
5. Bavelier D., Potter M. Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;134-147.
6. Bavelier D., Prasada S., Segui J. Repetition blindness between words: nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;1437-1455.
7. Baylis G.C., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 5:1993;453-466.
8. Bolinger D. Pronouns in discourse. Givon T. Discourse and syntax: syntax and semantics. 1979;Academic Press, New York.
9. Chialant D., Caramazza A. Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: implications for lexical processing. Cognition. 63:1997;79-119.
10. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 25:(2):1993;257-271.
11. Colombo L. Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 12:1986;226-234.
12. Davis, C. (1998). Self-organizing processes in the visual word recognition system: how do linguistic codes evolve? Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
13. Fagot C., Pashler H. Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;275-292.
14. Francis W.N., Kucera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. 1982;Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
15. French R.M. The subtlety of sameness: a theory and computer model of analogy-making. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Grainger J. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;228-244.
17. Grainger J., O'Regan J.K., Jacobs A.M., Segui J. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: the neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics. 45:1989;189-195.
18. Harris, C. L. (in press). Are individual or consecutive letters the unit affected by repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
19. Harris C.L., Morris A.L. Orthographic repetition blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 53A:2000;1039-1060.
20. Hochhaus, L. (2001). Is orthographic repetition deficit perceptual? Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Hochhaus L., Johnston J.C. Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;355-366.
22. Humphreys G.W., Evett L.J., Quinlan P.T. Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology. 22:1990;517-560.
23. Kanwisher, N. (1986). Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
24. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. Cognition. 27:1987;117-143.
25. Kanwisher N., Driver J., Machado L. Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color or shape. Cognitive Psychology. 29:1995;303-337.
26. Kanwisher N., Potter M. Repetition blindness: levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;30-47.
27. Kanwisher N., Yin C., Wojciulik E. Repetition blindness for pictures: evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. Coltheart V. Fleeting memories. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Lupker S.J., Williams B.A. Rhyme priming of pictures and words: a lexical activation account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 15:1989;1033-1046.
29. Miller G.A. Decision units in the perception of speech. Institute of Radio Engineers: Transactions on Information Theory. 8:1962;81-83.
30. Morris A.L., Harris C.L. A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: evidence from illusory words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;1060-1075.
31. Mozer M.C. The perception of multiple objects: a connectionist approach. 1991;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Park J., Kanwisher N. Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;500-519.
33. Peterson L.R., Peterson M.J. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58:1959;193-198.
34. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K.E. Computational principles in quasi-regular domains: understanding normal and impaired word reading. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
35. Potter M.C. Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): a method for studying language processing. Kieras D., Just M. New methods in reading comprehension research. 1984;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
36. Potter M., Moryadas A., Abrams I., Noel A. Word perception and misperception in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;3-22.
37. Prinzmetal W., Hoffman H., Vest K. Automatic processes in word perception: an analysis from illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;902-923.
38. Prinzmetal W., Treiman R., Rho S. How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language. 25:1986;461-475.
39. Segui J., Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;65-76.
40. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
41. Shillcock, R., & Monaghan, P. (2001). Inter- and intra-hemispheric processing and the modeling of visual word recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
42. Whittlesea B.W.A., Dorken M.D., Podrouzek K.W. Repeated events in rapid lists: part 1. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1670-1688.
43. Whittlesea B.W.A., Wai K.H. Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect. Psychological Research. 60:1997;173-182.
44. Ziegler J.C., Perry C. No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition. 68:1998;B53-B62.