Structural similarity to bridge sequence space: Finding new families on the bridges

Protein Science

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1305-1314

  Shah, Parantu K ^a,b   Aloy, Patrick ^a   Bork, Peer ^a,b   Russell, Robert B ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Domain family; Evolution; Protein structure; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENOME; FACTUAL DATABASE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS;

PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 17744375780     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.041187405     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alexander, J.M., Nelson, C.A., van Berkel, V., Lau, E.K., Studts, J.M., Brett, T.J., Speck, S.H., Handel, T.M., Virgin, H.W., and Fremont, D.H. 2002. Structural basis of chemokine sequestration by a herpes virus decoy receptor. Cell 111: 343-356.
2. Aloy, P., Oliva, B., Querol, E., Aviles, F.X., and Russell, R.B. 2002. Structural similarity to link sequence space: New potential superfamilies and implications for structural genomics. Protein Sci. 11: 1101-1116.
3. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
4. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Etwiller, L., Eddy, S.R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K.L., Marshall, M., and Sonnhammer, E.L. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 276-280.
5. Blattner, F.R., Plunkett 3rd, G., Bloch, C.A., Perna, N.T., Burland, V., Riley, M., Collado-Vides, J., Glasner, J.D., Rode, C.K., Mayhew, G.F., et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277: 1453-1474.
6. Cuff, J.A., Clamp, M.E., Siddiqui, A.S., Finlay, M., and Barton, G.J. 1998. JPred: A consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 14: 892-893.
7. Dietmann, S., Fernandez-Fuentes, N., and Holm, L. 2002. Automated detection of remote homology. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 362-367.
8. Eddy, S.R. 1998. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14: 755-763.
9. Eswaramoorthy, S., Gerchman, S., Graziano, V., Kycia, H., Studier, F.W., and Swaminathan, S. 2003. Structure of a yeast hypothetical protein selected by a structural genomics approach. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 59: 127-135.
10. Fraser, C.M., Gocayne, J.D., White, O., Adams, M.D., Clayton, R.A., Fleischmann, R.D., Bult, C.J., Kerlavage, A.R., Sutton, G., Kelley, J.M., et al. 1995. The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 270: 397-403.
11. Goffeau, A., Barrell, B.G., Bussey, H., Davis, R.W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F., Hoheisel, J.D., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., et al. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274: 546, 563-567.
12. Gough, J. and Chothia, C. 2002. SUPERFAMILY: HMMs representing all proteins of known structure. SCOP sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 268-272.
13. Gough, J., Karplus, K., Hughey, R., and Chothia, C. 2001. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 903-919.
14. Griffiths-Jones, S. and Bateman, A. 2002. The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics 18: 1243-1249.
15. Grishin, N.V. 2001. Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 167-185.
16. Heger, A., and Holm, L. 2001. Picasso: Generating a covering set of protein family profiles. Bioinformatics 17: 272-279.
17. Heikinheimo, P., Goldman, A., Jeffries, C., and Ollis, D.L. 1999. Of barn owls and bankers: A lush variety of α/β hydrolases. Structure Fold. Des. 7: R141-R146.
18. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1996. The FSSP database: Fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 206-209.
19. Hoskins, J., Alborn Jr., W.E., Arnold, J., Blaszczak, L.C., Burgett, S., DeHoff, B.S., Estrem, S.T., Fritz, L., Fu, D.J., Fuller, W., et al. 2001. Genome of the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae strain R6. J. Bacteriol. 183: 5709-5717.
20. Huang, A.M. and Rubin, G.M. 2000. A misexpression screen identifies genes that can modulate RAS1 pathway signaling in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 156: 1219-1230.
21. Huynen, M., Doerks, T., Eisenhaber, F., Orengo, C., Sunyaev, S., Yuan, Y., and Bork, P. 1998. Homology-based fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 280: 323-326.
22. Ingelfinger, J.A., Mosteller, F., Thibodeau, L.A., and Ware, J.H. 1987. Biostatistics in clinical medicine. Macmillan, New York.
23. Jaroszewski, L., Rychlewski, L., and Godzik, A. 2000. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments. Protein Sci. 9: 1487-1496.
24. Jeanmougin, F., Thompson, J.D., Gouy, M., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 403-405.
25. Karplus, K., Barrett, C., and Hughey, R. 1998. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14: 846-856.
26. Kelley, L.A., MacCallum, R.M., and Sternberg, M.J. 2000. Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. 299: 499-520.
27. Koretke, K.K., Russell, R.B., and Lupas, A.N. 2001. Fold recognition from sequence comparisons. Proteins Suppl. 5: 68-75.
28. Letunic, I., Goodstadt, L., Dickens, N.J., Doerks, T., Schultz, J., Mott, R., Ciccarelli, F., Copley, R.R., Ponting, C.P., and Bork, P. 2002. Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 242-244.
29. Lo Conte, L., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T.J., Chothia, C., and Murzin, A.G. 2002. SCOP database in 2002: Refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 264-267.
30. McGinnis, S. and Madden, T.L. 2004. BLAST: At the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: W20-W25.
31. McGuffin, L.J. and Jones, D.T. 2003. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 19: 874-881.
32. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., and Jones, D.T. 2000. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405.
33. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
34. Ohlson, T., Wallner, B., and Elofsson, A. 2004. Profile-profile methods provide improved fold-recognition: A study of different profile-profile alignment methods. Proteins 57: 188-197.
35. Ollis, D.L., Cheah, E., Cygler, M., Dijkstra, B., Frolow, F., Franken, S.M., Harel, M., Remington, S.J., Silman, I., Schrag, J., et al. 1992. The α/β hydrolase fold. Protein Eng. 5: 197-211.
36. Orengo, C.A., Pearl, F.M., and Thornton, J.M. 2003. The CATH domain structure database. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44: 249-271.
37. Panchenko, A.R. and Bryant, S.H. 2002. A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments. Protein Sci. 11: 361-370.
38. Pandit, S.B., Gosar, D., Abhiman, S., Sujatha, S., Dixit, S.S., Mhatre, N.S., Sowdhamini, R., and Srinivasan, N. 2002. SUPFAM - A database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: Implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 289-293.
39. Rodriguez, A.C. and Stock, D. 2002. Crystal structure of reverse gyrase: Insights into the positive supercoiling of DNA. EMBO J. 21: 418-426.
40. Rost, B. and Sander, C. 1994. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 19: 55-72.
41. Russell, R.B. and Barton, G.J. 1992. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: Assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins 14: 309-323.
42. Russell, R.B., Sasieni, P.D., and Sternberg, M.J. 1998. Supersites within super-folds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J. Mol. Biol. 282: 903-918.
43. Rychlewski, L., Jaroszewski, L., Li, W., and Godzik. A. 2000. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci. 9: 232-241.
44. Schmidt, S., Bork, P., and Dandekar, T. 2002. A versatile structural domain analysis server using profile weight matrices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42: 405-407.
45. Schonbrun, J., Wedemeyer, W.J., and Baker, D. 2002. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 348-354.
46. Schoorlemmer, J. and Goldfarb, M. 2001. Fibroblast growth factor homologous factors are intracellular signaling proteins. Curr. Biol. 11: 793-797.
47. Shi, J., Blundell, T.L., and Mizuguchi, K. 2001. FUGUE: Sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol. 310: 243-257.
48. Shimono, A., Okuda, T., and Kondoh, H. 1999. N-myc-dependent repression of ndr1, a gene identified by direct subtraction of whole mouse embryo cDNAs between wild type and N-myc mutant. Mech. Dev. 83: 39-52.
49. Sowdhamini, R., Burke, D.F., Huang, J.F., Mizuguchi, K., Nagarajaram, H.A., Srinivasan, N., Steward, R.E., and Blundell, T.L. 1998. CAMPASS: A database of structurally aligned protein superfamilies. Structure 6: 1087-1094.
50. Suetake, T., Tsuda, S., Kawabata, S., Miura, K., Iwanaga, S., Hikichi, K., Nitta, K., and Kawano, K. 2000. Chitin-binding proteins in invertebrates and plants comprise a common chitin-binding structural motif. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 17929-17932.
51. Teichmann, S.A., Chothia, C., and Gerstein, M. 1999. Advances in structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 390-399.
52. Todd, A.E., Orengo, C.A., and Thornton, J.M. 2001. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 1113-1143.
53. _. 2002. Plasticity of enzyme active sites. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 419-426.
54. Williams, M.G., Shirai, H., Shi, J., Nagendra, H.G., Mueller, J., Mizuguchi, K., Miguel, R.N., Lovell, S.C., Innis, C.A., Deane, C.M., et al. 2001. Sequence-structure homology recognition by iterative alignment refinement and comparative modeling. Proteins Suppl. 5: 92-97.
55. Wolf, Y.I., Brenner, S.E., Bash, P.A., and Koonin, E.V. 1999. Distribution of protein folds in the three superkingdoms of life. Genome Res. 9: 17-26.
56. Zhang, C. and Kim, S.H. 2003. Overview of structural genomics: From structure to function. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7: 28-32.
57. Zhang, H., Huang, K., Li, Z., Banerjei, L., Fisher, K.E., Grishin, N.V., Eisenstein, E., and Herzberg, O. 2000. Crystal structure of YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae (HI1434) at 1.8 Å resolution: Functional implications. Proteins 40: 86-97.