Electronic and Spectroscopic Studies of the Non-Heme Reduced Binuclear Iron Sites of Two Ribonucleotide Reductase Variants: Comparison to Reduced Methane Monooxygenase and Contributions to O2 Reactivity

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 3777-3788

  Wei, Pin Pin ^a   Skulan, Andrew J ^a   Mitić, Natasa ^a   Yang, Yi Shan ^a,c   Saleh, Lana ^b   Bollinger Jr , J Martin ^b   Solomon, Edward I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMILTONIANS; IRON; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROTEINS; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS;

CIRCULAR DICHROISM (CD); DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY (DFT);

ENZYME KINETICS;

ASPARTIC ACID; CARBOXYLIC ACID; ENZYME VARIANT; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR; HEME; IRON; METHANE MONOOXYGENASE; OXYGEN; OXYGENASE; RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASE; WATER;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMOREACTIVITY; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRONICS; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GEOMETRY; HAMILTONIAN ANALYSIS; LIGAND BINDING; MAGNETIC CIRCULAR DICHROISM; MAGNETISM; MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS; REDUCTION; SPECTROSCOPY; VARIABLE TEMPERATURE VARIABLE FIELD MAGNETIC CIRCULAR DICHROISM;

BINDING SITES; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; FERROUS COMPOUNDS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NONHEME IRON PROTEINS; OXYGEN; OXYGENASES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RIBONUCLEOTIDE REDUCTASES; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED;

EID: 1642395353     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0374731     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Wallar, B. J.; Lipscomb, J. D. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2625-2657.
2. Merkx, M.; Kopp, D.; Sazinsky, M.; Blazyk, J.; Muller, J.; Lippard, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2782-2807.
3. Baik, M. H.; Newcomb, M.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2385-2420.
4. Liu, Y.; Nesheim, J. C.; Paulsen, K. E.; Stankovich, M. T.; Lipscomb, J. D. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 5223-5233.
5. Stubbe, J.; Nocera, D. G.; Yee, C. S.; Chang, M. C. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2167-2202.
6. Yang, Y. S.; Baldwin, J.; Ley, B. A.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8495-8510.
7. Shanklin, J.; Cahoon, E. B. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 611-641.
8. Solomon, E. I.; Brunold, T. C.; Davis, M. I.; Kemsley, J. N.; Lee, S. K. ; Lehnert, N.; Neese, F.; Skulan, A. J.; Yang, Y. S.; Zhou, J. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 235-349.
9. Yang, Y. S.; Broadwater, J. A.; Pulver, S. C.; Fox, B. G.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2770-2783.
10. Nordlund, P.; Eklund, H. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1995, 5, 758-766.
11. Liu, K. E.; Valentine, A. M.; Wang, D. L.; Huynh, B. H.; Edmondson, D. E.; Salifoglou, A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10174-10185.
12. Fox, B. G.; Liu, Y.; Dege, J. E.; Lipscomb, J. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 540-550.
13. R2 is the subunit of RNR that contains the binuclear iron active site. MMOH is the hydroxylase component of MMO.
14. Whittington, D. A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 827-838.
15. Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Krebs, C.; Vicol, A.; Chen, S.; Ley, B. A.; Edmondson, D. E.; Huynh, B. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1094-1095.
16. peroxo.
17. Sturgeon, B. E.; Burdi, D.; Chen, S. X.; Huynh, B. H.; Edmondson, D. E.; Stubbe, J.; Hoffman, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7551-7557.
18. Krebs, C.; Chen, S. X.; Baldwin, J.; Ley, B. A.; Patel, U.; Edmondson, D. E.; Huynh, B. H.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12207-12219.
19. Baldwin, J.; Voegtli, W. C.; Khidekel, N.; Moenne-Loccoz, P.; Krebs, C.; Pereira, A. S.; Ley, B. A.; Huynh, B. H.; Loehr, T. M.; Riggs-Gelasco, P. J.; Rosenzweig, A. C.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7017-7030.
20. Logan, D. T.; Su, X.-D.; Åberg, A.; Regnström, K.; Hajdu, J.; Eklund, H.; Nordlund, P. Structure 1996, 4, 1053-1064.
21. Voegtli, W. C.; Khidekel, N.; Baldwin, J.; Ley, B. A.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Rosenzweig, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3255-3261.
22. Rosenzweig, A. C.; Nordlund, P.; Takahara, P. M.; Frederick, C. A.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 409-418.
23. Both His118 and His241 are monodentate on all structures described and remain so for the rest of this paper.
24. Pulver, S. C.; Tong, W. H.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Stubbe, J.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12664-12678.
25. Logan, D. T.; deMare, F.; Persson, B. O.; Slaby, A.; Sjoberg, B. M.; Nordlund, P. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 10798-10807.
26. 2) indicates that both irons are bridged by the same oxygen on the carboxylate which binds in a bidentate fashion to one Fe.
27. Whittington, D. A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 827-838.
28. Dunietz, B. D.; Beachy, M. D.; Cao, Y. X.; Whittington, D. A.; Lippard, S. J.; Friesner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2828-2839.
29. Torrent, M.; Musaev, D. G.; Basch, H.; Morokuma, K. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 59-76.
30. Lovell, T.; Han, W. G.; Liu, T. Q.; Noodleman, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5890-5894.
31. Torrent, M.; Musaev, D.; Morokuma, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 322-327.
32. Lovell, T.; Li, J.; Noodleman, L. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5267-5278.
33. Lovell, T.; Li, J.; Noodleman, L. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 7, 799-809.
34. Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Crabtree, R. H.; Nordlund, P. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 314-317.
35. Voegtli, W. C.; Sommerhalter, M.; Saleh, L.; Baldwin, J.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Rosenzweig, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15822-15830.
36. Solomon, E. I.; Pavel, E. G.; Loeb, K. E.; Campochiaro, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 144, 369-460.
37. Moenne-Loccoz, P.; Baldwin, J.; Ley, B. A.; Loehr, T. M.; Bollinger, J. M., Jr. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 14659-14663.
38. Gill, S. C.; von Hippel, P. H. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 182, 319-326.
39. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
40. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 4524.
41. Perdew, J. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 33, 8822.
42. BP86 was selected as the functional in this investigation as there is a good correlation between the electronic structure of biferric peroxo complexes and that predicted by BP86 calcuations (Brunold, T. C.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5674-5690).
43. Skulan, A. J., manuscript in preparation.
44. Geometry convergence criteria were as follows: change in total energy, ΔE < 5e-5 hartrees, maximum local energy gradient, δE/δS < 4.5e-4 hartrees/Å, δE/δS(RMS) < 3e-4 hartrees/Å, ΔS < 1.8e-3 Å, ΔS(RMS) < 1.2e-5 Å. Frequency calculations to verify that true minima had been attained were not possible as Jaguar 4.1 and subsequent Jaguar 5.0 have not implemented parallelized analytical frequency determination, Such calculations will be performed once this functionality has been added.
45. The residue truncation was performed as follows: the α-carbon was replaced by a hydrogen atom with concomitant shortening of the α-C-β-C bond to 1.08 Å, with the β-C retaining its original position. This hydrogen was then frozen in all geometry optimizations.
46. -. The positions of the heavy atoms (C, N, O) were frozen along with the positions of hydrogens replacing carbon atoms. Q43 and Q87 were modeled differently (as formamide and ammonia, respectively) as the R-group nitrogen of Q43 was located 2.8 Å from a carboxylate oxygen on D237 suggesting hydrogen bonding between these two residues which may have been of importance to the geometry of the active site. W/F48 residue, the second substitution from wt, was not included in the model as it does not coordinate to either iron or iron-coordinated residues.
47. 2-) by the D84E substitution and the introduction of a water molecule which is hydrogen-bonded to E84 in the variant.
48. Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299-310.
49. CD was taken on a solution at 5 °C while MCD data were taken on a glass at 1.6 K.
50. Solomon, E. I.; Pavel, E. G.; Loeb, K. E.; Campochiaro, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 144, 369-460.
51. Because the CD/MCD of the R2-W48F/D84E are almost the same as the single variant, they are not included for clarity.
52. Pulver, S.; Froland, W. A.; Fox, B. G.; Lipscomb, J. D.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115. 12409-12422.
53. -1 for the single variant and are included in Supporting Information S2.
54. Stevens, P. J. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1974, 25, 201.
55. Zhang, Y.; Gebhard, M. S.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5162-5175.
56. Schatz, P. N.; Mowery, R. L.; Krausz, E. R. Mol. Phys. 1978, 35, 1537-1557.
57. Bennet, D. E.; Johnson, M. K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1987, 911, 71-80.
58. -1 band in Figure 2b.
59. -1, equally good fits could be obtained using an axial (z-polarized) or rhombic (y-polarized) model.
60. Strand, K. R.; Yang, Y. S.; Andersson, K. K.; Solomon, E. I. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 12223-12234
61. Hendrich, M. P.; Munck, E.; Fox, B. G.; Lipscomb, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5861-5865.
62. These starting geometries included (4C, 4C), (4C, 5C), and (5C, 5C) with E84 and E204 mono- or bidentate and E115 and E238 in μ-1,3 or μ-1,1 bridging geometries.
63. Lee, D.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2704-2719.
64. Baik, M. H.; Lee, D.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. Isr. J. Chem. 2001, 41, 173-186.
65. Gehring, S.; Haase, W. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1989, 176, 513-522.
66. Haase, W.; Gehring, S. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1985, 2609-2613.
67. Muhonen, H.; Pajunen, A.; Hamalainen, R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1980, 36, 2790-2793.
68. Rosenzweig, A. C.; Frederick, C. A.; Lippard, S. J.; Nordlund, P. Nature 1993, 366, 537-543.
69. Assarsson, M.; Andersson, M. E.; Hogbom, M.; Persson, B. O.; Sahlin, M.; Barra, A. L.; Sjoberg, B. M.; Nordlund, P.; Graslund, A. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 26852-26859.
70. Herold, S.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 145-156.
71. Tolman, W. B.; Liu, S.; Bentsen, J. G.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 152-164.
72. Blondin, G.; Girerd, J. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 1359-1376.
73. Goodenough, J. B. Phys. Rev. 1955, 79, 564.
74. Kanamori, J. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1959, 10, 87.
75. Reem, R. C.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1216-1226.
76. The interaction is complicated by the nonzero torsion angle between the two iron atoms and the carboxylate (ψ = 32°), which leads to mixing of the carboxylate in-plane and out-of-plane O(2p) and causes the relationship between the carboxylate orbitals to be less clear in figures 12c and 12d (in contrast with figures 12a and 12b in which the perpendicular orientation of the bridging E238 O(2p) orbitals is well illustrated).
77. Bollinger, J. M., Jr.; Krebs, C.; Vicol, A.; Chen, S.; Ley, B. A.; Edmondson, D. E.; Huynh, B. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1094-1095.
78. It should be noted that the steric interaction between Y122 and E84 is not required in the geometry optimizations to reproduce the bidentate coordination of E84 to Fe1 (Figure 10). The model used for the R2-W48F/D84E active site replaces the Y122 residue with a water molecule where C is modeled by a hydrogen (with its coordinates frozen during the optimizations) and O as the water oxygen (also frozen during optimization). Thus, there is no phenyl ring present to interact with the aliphatic chain of E84, although the effects of this interaction, the addition of TIP93 and the displacement of Y122 relative to wt, are included.
79. Liu, K. E.; Nesheim, J. C.; Lee, S.-K.; Lipscomb, J. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 24662-24665.
80. Ormo, M.; deMare, F.; Regnstrom, K.; Aberg, A.; Sahlin, M.; Ling, J.; Loehr, T. M.; Sanders-Loehr, J.; Sjoberg, B. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267.
81. Gassner, G. T.; Lippard, S. J. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 12768-12785.