Comparative analysis of protein domain organization

Genome Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 343-353

  Ye, Yuzhen ^a   Godzik, Adam ^a  

^a BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; ARCHAEAL PROTEIN; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARCHAEBACTERIUM; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GENOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUKARYOTE; GENOME ANALYSIS; HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PYROCOCCUS; REVIEW; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICS;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; HAEMOPHILUS; HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZAE; PYROCOCCUS; PYROCOCCUS HORIKOSHII;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; ARCHAEAL PROTEINS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENOME; GENOME, ARCHAEAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME, PLANT; HUMANS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 1542286754     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.1610504     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Aasland, R., Gibson, T.J., and Stewart, A.F. 1995. The PHD finger: Implications for chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 56-59.
2. Anantharaman, V., Koonin, E.V., and Aravind, L. 2001. TRAM, a predicted RNA-binding domain, common to tRNA uracil methylation and adenine thiolation enzymes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 197: 215-221.
3. Apic, G., Gough, J., and Teichmann, S.A. 2001. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J. Mol. Biol. 310: 311-325.
4. Aravind, L. and Koonin, E.V. 1998. The HD domain defines a new superfamily of metal-dependent phosphohydrolases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 469-472.
5. Aravind, L. and Koonin, E.V. 2000. The U box is a modified RING finger - A common domain in ubiquitination. Curr. Biol. 10: R132-R134.
6. Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Eppig, J.T., et al. 2000. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25: 25-29.
7. Bashton, M. and Chothia, C. 2002. The geometry of domain combination in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 315: 927-939.
8. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Etwiller, L., Eddy, S.R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K.L., Marshall, M., and Sonnhammer, E.L. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 276-280.
9. Birney, E., Kumar, S., and Krainer, A.R. 1993. Analysis of the RNA-recognition motif and RS and RGG domains: Conservation in metazoan pre-mRNA splicing factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 5803-5816.
10. Borden, K.L. and Freemont, P.S. 1996. The RING finger domain: A recent example of a sequence-structure family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6: 395-401.
11. Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A.F., Altschul, S.F., and Koonin, E.V. 1997. A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 11: 68-76.
12. Carballo, E., Lai, W.S., and Blackshear, P.J. 1998. Feedback inhibition of macrophage tumor necrosis factor-α production by tristetraprolin. Science 281: 1001-1005.
13. Dokholyan, N.V., Shakhnovich, B., and Shakhnovich, E.I. 2002. Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 14132-14136.
14. Enright, AJ. and Ouzounis, C.A. 2001. Functional associations of proteins in entire genomes by means of exhaustive detection of gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2: RESEARCH0034.
15. Enright, A.J., Iliopoulos, I., Kyrpides, N.C., and Ouzounis, C.A. 1999. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature 402: 86-90.
16. Evans, R.M. and Hollenberg, S.M. 1988. Zinc fingers: Gilt by association. Cell 52: 1-3.
17. Frishman, D., Mokrejs, M., Kosykh, D., Kastenmuller, G., Kolesov, G., Zubrzycki, I., Gruber, C., Geier, B., Kaps, A., Albermann, K., et al. 2003. The PEDANT genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 207-211.
18. Galperin, M.Y. and Koonin, E.V. 2000. Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 609-613.
19. George, D.G., Hunt, L.T., Yeh, L.S., and Barker, W.C. 1985. New perspectives on bacterial ferredoxin evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 22: 20-31.
20. Guelzim, N., Bottani, S., Bourgine, P., and Kepes, F. 2002. Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nat. Genet. 31: 60-63.
21. Hershko, A., Ciechanover, A., and Varshavsky, A. 2000. The ubiquitin system. Nat. Med. 6: 1073-1081.
22. Hoch, J.A. 2000. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3: 165-170.
23. Holland, P.W.H. 1999. Gene duplication: Past, present and future. Cell Dev. Biol. 10: 541-547.
24. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1998. Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures. Proteins 33: 88-96.
25. Hou, J., Sims, G.E., Zhang, C., and Kim, S.H. 2003. A global representation of the protein fold space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 2386-2390.
26. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z.N., and Barabasi, A.L. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407: 651-654.
27. Jeong, H., Mason, S.P., Barabasi, A.L., and Oltvai, Z.N. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411: 41-42.
28. Joazeiro, C.A., Wing, S.S., Huang, H., Leverson, J.D., Hunter, T., and Liu, Y.C. 1999. The tyrosine kinase negative regulator c-Cbl as a RING-type, E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase. Science 286: 309-312.
29. Jones, D., Crowe, E., Stevens, T.A., and Candido, E.P. 2002. Functional and phylogenetic analysis of the ubiquitylation system in Caenorhabditis elegans: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, ubiquitin-activating enzymes, and ubiquitin-like proteins. Genome Biol. 3: RESEARCH0002.
30. Kanno, M., Hasegawa, M., Ishida, A., Isono, K., and Taniguchi, M. 1995. mel-18, a Polycomb group-related mammalian gene, encodes a transcriptional negative regulator with tumor suppressive activity. EMBO J. 14: 5672-5678.
31. Katz, R.A. and Jentoft, J.E. 1989. What is the role of the cys-his motif in retroviral nucleocapsid (NC) proteins? Bioessays 11: 176-181.
32. Kelley, B.P., Sharan, R., Karp, R.M., Sittler, T., Root, D.E., Stockwell, B.R., and Ideker, T. 2003. Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 11394-11399.
33. Kriventseva, E.V., Koch, I., Apweiler, R., Vingron, M., Bork, P., Gelfand, M.S., and Sunyaev, S. 2003. Increase of functional diversity by alternative splicing. TIG 19: 124-128.
34. Lovering, R., Hanson, I.M., Borden, K.L., Martin, S., O'Reilly, N.J., Evan, G.I., Rahman, D., Pappin, D.J., Trowsdale, J., and Freemont, P.S. 1993. Identification and preliminary characterization of a protein motif related to the zinc finger. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 2112-2116.
35. Mande, S.S., Sarfaty, S., Allen, M.D., Perham, R.N., and Hol, W.G. 1996. Protein-protein interactions in the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex: Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase complexed with the binding domain of dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase. Structure 4: 277-286.
36. Marchler-Bauer, A., Anderson, J.B., DeWeese-Scott, C., Fedorova, N.D., Geer, L.Y., He, S., Hurwitz, D.I., Jackson, J.D., Jacobs, A.R., Lanczycki, C.J., et al. 2003. CDD: A curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 383-387.
37. Marcotte, E.M., Pellegrini, M., Ng, H.L., Rice, D.W., Yeates, T.O., and Eisenberg, D. 1999a. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285: 751-753.
38. Marcotte, E.M., Pellegrini, M., Thompson, M.J., Yeates, T.O., and Eisenberg, D. 1999b. Combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402: 83-86.
39. Minieka, E. 1978. Path algorithms. In Optimization algorithms for networks and graphs, pp. 41-84. Marcel Dekkar, New York.
40. Mott, R., Schultz, J., Bork, P., and Ponting, C.P. 2002. Predicting protein cellular localization using a domain projection method. Genome Res. 12: 1168-1174.
41. Mulder, N.J., Apweiler, R., Attwood, T.K., Bairoch, A., Barrell, D., Bateman, A., Binns, D., Biswas, M., Bradley, P., Bork, P., et al. 2003. The InterPro database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 315-318.
42. Muratani, M. and Tansey, W.P. 2003. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4: 192-201.
43. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
44. Musco, G., Stier, G., Joseph, C., Castiglione Morelli, M.A., Nilges, M., Gibson, T.J., and Pastore, A. 1996. Three-dimensional structure and stability of the KH domain: Molecular insights into the fragile X syndrome. Cell 85: 237-245.
45. Neuwald, A.F. and Landsman, D. 1997. GCNS-related histone N-acetyltransferases belong to a diverse superfamily that includes the yeast SPT10 protein. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22: 154-155.
46. Newman, M.E.J., Strogatz, S.H., and Watts, D.J. 2001. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. 64: 026118.
47. Orengo, C.A., Michie, A.D., Jones, S., Jones, D.T., Swindells, M.B., and Thornton, J.M. 1997. CATH - A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5: 1093-1108.
48. Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Appl. Biosci. 12: 357-358.
49. Pao, G.M. and Saier, M.H.J. 1995. Response regulators of bacterial signal transduction systems: Selective domain shuffling during evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 40: 136-154.
50. Patthy, L. 1999. Protein evolution, pp. 142-183. Blackwell Science, Malden.
51. Pellegrini, M., Marcotte, E.M., Thompson, M.J., Eisenberg, D., and Yeates, T.O. 1999. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 4285-4288.
52. Ponting, C.P., Blake, D.J., Davies, K.E., Kendrick-Jones, J., and Winder, S.J. 1996. ZZ and TAZ: New putative zinc fingers in dystrophin and other proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21: 11-13.
53. Ravasz, E., Somera, A.L., Mongru, D.A., Oltvai, Z.N., and Barabasi, A.-L. 2002. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297: 1551-1555.
54. Reizer, J. and Saier, M.H.J. 1997. Modular multidomain phosphoryl transfer proteins of bacteria. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 407-415.
55. Rychlewski, L., Jaroszewski, L., Li, W., and Godzik, A. 2000. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci. 9: 232-241.
56. Saier, M.H.J. and Reizer, J. 1994. The bacterial phosphotransferase system: New frontiers 30 years later. Mol. Microbiol. 13: 755-764.
57. Saurin, A.J., Borden, K.L., Boddy, M.N., and Freemont, P.S. 1996. Does this have a familiar RING? Trends Biochem. Sci. 21: 208-214.
58. Schultz, J., Milpetz, F., Bork, P., and Ponting, C.P. 1998. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 5857-5864.
59. Servant, F., Bru, C., Carrere, S., Courcelle, E., Gouzy, J., Peyruc, D., and Kahn, D. 2002. ProDom: Automated clustering of homologous domains. Brief Bioinform. 3: 246-251.
60. Shakhnovich, B.E., Dokholyan, N.V., DeLisi, C., and Shakhnovich, E.I. 2003. Functional fingerprints of folds: Evidence for correlated structure-function evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 326: 1-9.
61. Shen-Orr, S.S., Milo, R., Mangan, S., and Alon, U. 2002. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coil Nat. Genet. 31: 64-68.
62. Snel, B., Bork, P., and Huynen, M.A. 2002. The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 5890-5895.
63. Sofia, H.J., Chen, G., Hetzler, B.G., Reyes-Spindola, J.F., and Miller, N.E. 2001. Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: Functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 1097-1106.
64. +-dependent DNA ligase encoded by a eukaryotic virus. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 36100-36109.
65. 54-dependent transcriptional activators. J. Bacteriol. 185: 1757-1767.
66. Tatusov, R.L., Mushegian, A.R., Bork, P., Brown, N.P., Hayes, W.S., Borodovsky, M., Rudd, K.E., and Koonin, E.V. 1996. Metabolism and evolution of Haemophilus infiuenzae deduced from a whole-genome comparison with Escherichia coll. Curr. Biol. 6: 279-291.
67. Wagner, A. and Fell, D.A. 2001. The small world inside large metabolic networks. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268: 1803-1810.
68. Wuchty, S. 2001. Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1694-1702.
69. Yaseen, N.R. and Blobel, G. 1999. Two distinct classes of Ran-binding sites on the nucleoporin Nup-358. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 5516-5521.