Genetics of hybrid incompatibility between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum

Genetics

Volumn 169, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 355-373

  Moyle, Leonie C ^a   Graham, Elaine B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIPLOIDY; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; GENETIC MODEL; GENOME; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; HYBRIDIZATION; NEAR ISOGENIC LINE; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEED FERTILITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCTION;

HIRSUTUM; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM; SOLANUM; SOLANUM HABROCHAITES;

EID: 13744262010     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.029546     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. ALPERT, K. B., S. GRANDILLO and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Fw-2.2 - a major QTL controlling fruit weight is common to both red-fruited and green-fruited tomato species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 994-1000.
2. ARNQVIST, G., M. EDVARDSSON, U. FRIBERG and T. NILSSON, 2000 Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10460-10464.
3. ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
4. BARBASH, D. A., D. F. SIINO, A. M. TARONE and J. ROOTE, 2003 A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5302-5307.
5. BARTON, N. H., and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1984 Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 133-164.
6. BERNACCHI, D., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1997 An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum X L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861-877.
7. BERNACCHI, D., T. BECK-BUNN, D. EMMATTY, Y. ESHED, S. INAI et al., 1998a Advanced backcross QTL analysis of tomato. II. Evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 170-180.
8. BERNACCHI, D., T. BECK-BUNN, Y. ESHED, J. LOPEZ, V. PETIARD et al., 1998b Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 381-397.
9. BRADSHAW, H. D., and D. W. SCHEMSKE, 2003 Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426: 176-178.
10. BRADSHAW, H. D., S. M. WILBERT, K G. OTTO and D. W. SCHEMSKE, 1995 Genetic-mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376: 762-765.
11. BRINK, R. A., and D. C. COOPER, 1947 The endosperm in seed development. Bot. Rev. 13: 423-541.
12. BULL, J. J., 1983 Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Benjamin Cummings, Reading, MA.
13. COYNE, J. A., 1992 Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
14. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1989a Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
15. COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1989b Two rules of speciation, pp. 180-207 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by D. OTTE and J. A. ENDLER. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
16. COYNE, J. A., S. SIMEONIDIS and P. ROONEY, 1998 Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 150: 1091-1103.
17. CROW, J. F., and M. KIMURA, 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.
18. DAVIS, A. W., and C.-I WU, 1996 The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 143: 1287-1298.
19. DE NETTANCOURT, D., 2001 Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer, Berlin.
20. DOBZHANSKY, T., 1936 Studies on hybrid sterility II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113-135.
21. DOBZHANSKY, T., 1951 Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
22. DOGANLAR, S., A. FRARY, H. M. KU and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2002 Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45: 1189-1202.
23. DOI, K., K. TAGUCHI and A. YOSHIMURA, 1999 RFLP mapping of S20 and S21 for F1 pollen semi-sterility found in backcross progeny of Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima. Rice Genet. Newsl. 16: 65-67.
24. DUNNETT, C. W., 1955 A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50: 1096-1121.
25. EHLENFELDT, M. K., and R. ORTIZ, 1995 Evidence on the nature and origins of endosperm dosage requirements in Solanum and other angiosperm genera. Sex. Plant Reprod. 8: 189-196.
26. EL-ASSAL, S. E. D., C. ALONSO-BLANCO, A. J. M. PEETERS, V. RAZ and M. KOORNNEEF, 2001 A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat. Genet. 29: 435-440.
27. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1995 An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
28. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1996 Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Genetics 143: 1807-1817.
29. FISHMAN, L., and J. H. WILLIS, 2001 Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55: 1932-1942.
30. FRARY, A., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2001 The molecular map of tomato, pp. 405-420 in DNA Based Markers in Plants, edited by R. L. PHILIPS and I. K. VASIL. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
31. FRARY, A., T. C. NESBITT, S. GRANDILLO, E. VAN DER KNAAP, B. CONG et al., 2000 fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
32. FRIDMAN, E., T. PLEBAN and D. ZAMIR, 2000 A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4718-4723.
33. GRANT, V., 1963 The Origin of Adaptations. Columbia University Press, New York.
34. GORMAN, S. W., and S. MCCORMICK, 1997 Male sterility in tomato. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16: 31-53.
35. GOTTLIEB, L. D., 1984 Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am. Nat. 123: 681-709.
36. HARTL, D. L., and A. G. CLARK, 1989 Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37. HARUSHIMA, Y., M. NAKAGAHRA, M. YANO, T. SASAKI and N. KURATA, 2001 A genome-wide survey of reproductive barriers in an intraspecific hybrid. Genetics 159: 883-892.
38. HARUSHIMA, Y., M. NAKAGAHRA, M. YANO, T. SASAKI and N. KURATA, 2002 Diverse variation of reproductive barriers in three intraspecific rice crosses. Genetics 160: 313-322.
39. HODGES, S. A., J. B. WHITTALL, M. FULTON and J. Y. YANG, 2002 Genetics of floral traits influencing reproductive isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Am. Nat. 159: S51-S60.
40. HOGENBOOM, N. G., 1972 Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. I. The genus Lycopersicon, its breeding barriers and the importance of breaking those barriers. Euphytica 21: 221-227.
41. HOLLOCHER, H., and C.-I WU, 1996 The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143: 1243-1255.
42. IKEHASHI, H., and H. ARAKI, 1988 Multiple alleles controlling F1 sterility in remote crosses of rice (Oryza sativa). Jpn. J. Breed. 38: 283-291.
43. JOHNSTON, S. A., T. P. N. DEN NIJS, S. J. PELOQUIN and R. E. HANNEMAN, 1980 The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 57: 5-9.
44. KATSIOTIS, A., R. E. HANNEMAN and R. A. FORSBERG, 1995 Endosperm balance number and the polar-nuclear activation hypothesis for endosperm development in interspecific crosses of Solanaceae and Gramineae respectively. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 848-855.
45. KEARNS, C. A., and D. W. INOUYE, 1993 Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, CO.
46. KIM, S. C., and L. H. RIESEBERG, 1999 Genetic architecture of species differences in annual sunflowers: implications for adaptive trait introgression. Genetics 153: 965-977.
47. KIM, S. C., and L. H. RIESEBERG, 2001 The contribution of epistasis to species differences in annual sunflowers. Mol. Ecol. 10: 683-690.
48. KONDO, K., M. YAMAMOTO, R. ITAHASHI, T. SATO, H. EGASHIRA et al., 2002 Insights into the evolution of self-compatibility in Lycopersicon from a study of stylar factors. Plant J. 30: 143-153.
49. KUBO, T., M. EGUCHI and A. YOSHIMURA, 2001 A new gene for F1 pollen sterility located on chromosome 12 in Japonica/Indica cross of rice. Rice Genet. Newsl. 18: 54.
50. LAURIE, C. C., 1997 The weaker sex is heterogametic: 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics 147: 937-951.
51. LESTER, R. N., and J. H. KANG, 1998 Embryo and endosperm function and failure in Solanum species and hybrids. Ann. Bot. 82: 445-453.
52. LEVIN, D. A., 2000 The Origin, Expansion, and Demise of Plant Species. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
53. LI, Z. K., S. R. M. PINSON, A. H. PATERSON, W. D. PARK and J. W. STANSEL, 1997 Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an intersubspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics 145: 1139-1148.
54. LIU, Y. S., L. H. ZHU, J. S. SUN and Y. CHEN, 2001 Mapping QTLs for defective female gametophyte development in an inter-subspecific cross in Oryza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 1243-1251.
55. LU, J., W. H. LI and C.-I WU, 2003 Comment on "Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence - accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes". Science 302: 988b.
56. MARIN, I., 1996 Genetic architecture of autosome-mediated hybrid male sterility in Drosophila. Genetics 142: 1169-1180.
57. MARTIN, F. W., 1962 Distribution and interrelationships of incompatibility barriers in the Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. complex. Evolution 17: 519-528.
58. MASUELLI, R. W., 2001 Mitotic-cycle time and the development of embryo and endosperm in compatible and incompatible crosses in tuber-bearing Solanum species. Genome 44: 426-431.
59. MATSUBARA, K., T. KHIN and Y. SANO, 2003 A gene block causing cross-incompatibility hidden in wild and cultivated rice. Genetics 165: 343-352.
60. MENDELSON, T. C., 2003 Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57: 317-327.
61. MILLER, J. C., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1990 RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 437-448.
62. MONFORTE, A. J., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2000 Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43: 803-813.
63. MOYLE, L. C., M. S. OLSON and P. TIFFIN, 2004 Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58: 1195-1208.
64. MULLER, H. J., 1939 Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. 14: 185-268.
65. MYBURG, A. A., C. VOGL, A. R. GRIFFIN, R. R. SEDEROFF and R. W. WHETTEN, 2004 Genetics of postzygotic isolation in eucalyptus: whole-genome analysis of barriers to introgression in a wide interspecific cross of Eucalyptus grandis and E. globulus. Genetics 166: 1405-1418.
66. NAVARRO, A., and N. H. BARTON, 2003 Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57: 447-459.
67. NAVEIRA, H. F., 1992 Location of X-linked polygenic effects causing sterility in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauriliana. Heredity 68: 211-217.
68. NAVEIRA, H. F., and A. FONTDEVILA, 1986 The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. 12. The genetic basis of sterility in hybrids between Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. serido from Argentina. Genetics 114: 841-857.
69. NAVEIRA, H. F., and X. R. MASIDE, 1998 The genetics of hybrid male sterility in Drosophila, pp. 330-338 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. W. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
70. NESBITT, T. C., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2002 Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162: 365-379.
71. NOOR, M. A. F., K. L. GRAMS, L. A. BERTUCCI and J. REILAND, 2001 Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12084-12088.
72. ORR, H. A., and J. A. COYNE, 1992 The genetics of adaptation - a reassessment. Am. Nat. 140: 725-742.
73. OSTERBERG, M. K., O. SHAVORSKAYA, M. LASCOUX and U. LAGERCRANTZ, 2002 Naturally occurring indel variation in the Brassica nigra COL1 gene is associated with variation in flowering time. Genetics 161: 299-306.
74. PARAN, I., and D. ZAMIR, 2003 Quantitative traits in plants: beyond the QTL. Trends Genet. 19: 303-306.
75. PERALTA, I. E., and D. M. SPOONER, 2001 Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon Mill. Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1888-1902.
76. PILLEN, K., O. PINEDA, C. B. LEWIS and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1996 Status of genome mapping tools in the taxon Solanaceae, pp. 281-308 in Genome Mapping in Plants, edited by A. H. PATERSON. R. G. Landes, Austin, TX.
77. PRESGRAVES, D. C., 2002 Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56: 1168-1183.
78. PRESGRAVES, D. C., 2003 A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955-972.
79. PRESGRAVES, D. C., and H. A. ORR, 1998 Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282: 952-954.
80. PRESGRAVES, D. C., L. BALAGOPALAN, S. M. ABMAYR and H. A. ORR, 2003 Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
81. PRICE, T. D., and M. M. BOUVIER, 2002 The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56: 2083-2089.
82. QUIROS, C. F., 1991 Lycopersicon cytogenetics, pp. 67-81 in Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, edited by P. K. GUPTA and T. TSUCHIYA. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
83. REMINGTON, D. L., and M. D. PURUGGANAN, 2003 Candidate genes, quantitative trait loci, and functional trait evolution in plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: S7-S20.
84. RICK, C. M., 1979 Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum, pp. 667-679 in The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, edited by J. G. HAWKES, R. N. LESTER and A. D. SKELDING.
85. RICK, C. M., 1995 Tomato, pp. 452-457 in Evolution of Crop Plants, edited by J. SMARTT and N. W. SIMMONDS. Longman Scientific & Technical, London.
86. RICK, C. M., J. F. FOBES and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1979 Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 132: 279-298.
87. RIESEBERG, L. H., 2001 Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 351-358.
88. RIESEBERG, L. H., S. J. E. BAIRD and K. A. GARDNER, 2000 Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 205-224.
89. SANO, Y., 1986 International Rice Genetics Symposium, pp. 109-118. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
90. SASA, M. M., P. T. CHIPPINDALE and N. A. JOHNSON, 1998 Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52: 1811-1820.
91. SILVA, R. F., R. B. KOCH and E. L. MOORE, 1982 Effect of extraction procedures on tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) seed germination and vigour. Seed Sci. Technol. 10: 187-191.
92. SLOTMAN, M., A. DELLA TORRE and J. R. POWELL, 2004 The genetics of inviability and male sterility in hybrids between Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis. Genetics 167: 275-287.
93. SOBRIZAL, Y., Y. MATSUZAKI and A. YOSHIMURA, 2002 Mapping of pollen semi-sterility gene, S28(t), on rice chromosome 4. Rice Genet. Newsl. 19: 80-81.
94. STEBBINS, G. L., 1950 Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
95. STEPHAN, W., and C. H. LANGLEY, 1998 DNA polymorphism in Lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics 150: 1585-1593.
96. STEVENS, M. A., and C. M. RICK, 1986 Genetics and breeding, pp. 33-109 in The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, edited by J. G. ATHERTON and J. RUDICH. Chapman & Hall, London.
97. SWANSON, W. J., and V. D. VACQUIER, 2002 Reproductive protein evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 161-179.
98. TANKSLEY, S. D., M. W. GANAL, J. P. PRINCE, M. C. DEVICENTE, M. W. BONIERBALE et al., 1992 High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
99. TAO, Y., and D. L. HARTL, 2003 Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57: 2580-2598.
100. TAO, Y., S. N. CHEN, D. L. HARTL and C. C. LAURIE, 2003a Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164: 1383-1397.
101. TAO, Y., Z-B. ZENG, J. LI, D. L. HARTL and C. C. LAURIE, 2003b Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. II. Mapping hybrid male sterility loci on the third chromosome. Genetics 164: 1399-1418.
102. TILLEY, S. G., P. A. VERRELL and S. J. ARNOLD, 1990 Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation - a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2715-2719.
103. TING, C. T., S. C. TSAUR, M. L. WU and C.-I WU, 1998 A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282: 1501-1504.
104. TRUE, J. R., B. S. WEIR and C. C. LAURIE, 1996 A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142: 819-837.
105. TURELLI, M., and H. A. ORR, 1995 The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140: 389-402.
106. TURELLI, M., and H. A. ORR, 2000 Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
107. WALBOT, V., and M. M. S. EVANS, 2003 Unique features of the plant life cycle and their consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 369-379.
108. WU, C.-I, and A. W. DAVIS, 1993 Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation - the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142: 187-212.
109. WU, C.-I, and H. HOLLOCHER, 1998 Subtle is nature: the genetics of species differentiation and speciation, pp. 339-351 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. W. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
110. WU, C.-I, N. A. JOHNSON and M. F. PALOPOLI, 1996 Haldane's rule and its legacy: Why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 281-284.
111. ZAMIR, D., 2001 Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 983-989.
112. ZAR, J. H., 1984 Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.