Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato

Genetics

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1807-1817

  Eshed, Yuval ^a   Zamir, Dani ^b  

^a Department of Field Crops ^*  (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

BREEDING; EPISTASIS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOZYGOTE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REVIEW; TOMATO;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII;

EID: 0029799522     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. COCKERHAM, C. C., and Z. B. ZENG, 1996 Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437-1456.
2. COUPLAND, G., 1995 Genetic and environmental control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Trends Genet. 11: 393-397.
3. DE-VICENTE, M. C., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1993 QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
4. DOEBLEY, J., and A. STEC, 1991 Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129: 285-295.
5. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and C. GUSTUS, 1995 teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
6. DUNNET, C. W., 1955 A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50: 1096-1121.
7. EDWARDS, M. D., C. W. STUBER and J. F. WENDEL, 1987 Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116: 113-125.
8. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1994 Introgressions from Lycopersicon pennellii can improve the soluble-solids yield of tomato hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 891-897.
9. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1995 Introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
10. ESHED, Y., G. GERA and D. ZAMIR, 1996 A genome-wide search for wild-species alleles that increase horticultural yield of processing tomatoes. Theor. Appl. Genet. (in press).
11. FALCONER, D. S., 1989 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. GOLDMAN, I. L., I. PARAN and D. ZAMIR, 1995 Quantitative trait locus analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon cheesmanii cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 925-932.
13. HAYMAN, B. I., 1958 The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12: 371-390.
14. KOORNNEEF, M., C. J. HANHART and J. H. VAN DER VEEN, 1991 A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 57-66.
15. LARK, K. G., K. CHASE, F. ADLER, L. M. MANSUR and J. H. ORF, 1995 Interactions between quantitative trait loci in soybean in which trait variation at one locus is conditional upon a specific allele at another. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 4656-4660.
16. LIN, Y., K. F. SCHERTZ and A. H. PATERSON, 1995 Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across Poacceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics 141: 391-411.
17. LONG, A. D., S. L. MULLANEY, L. A. REID, J. D. FRY, C. H. LANGLEY et al., 1995 High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 1273-1291.
18. MORENO-GONZALEZ, J., and J. W. DUDLEY, 1981 Epistasis in related and unrelated maize hybrids determined by three methods. Crop Sci. 21: 644-651.
19. PATERSON, A. H., S. DAMON, J. D. HEWITT, D. ZAMIR, H. D. RABINOWITCH et al., 1991 Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197.
20. POWELL, W., W. T. B. THOMAS, D. M. THOMPSON, J. S. SWANSTON and R. WAUGH, 1992 Association between rDNA alleles and quantitative traits in doubled haploid populations of barley. Genetics 130: 187-194.
21. POWERS, L., 1941 Inheritance of quantitative characters in crosses involving two species of Lycopersicon. J. Agric. Res. 63: 149-174.
22. SAS INSTITUTE, 1994 JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide: version 3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
23. SPICKETT, S. G., and J. M. THODAY, 1966 Regular responses to selection. 3. Interactions between located polygenes, Genet. Res. 7: 96-121.
24. STUBER, C. W., S. E. LINCOLN, D. W. WOLFF, T. HELENTJARIS and E. S. LANDER, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
25. TANKSLEY, S. D., 1993 Mapping polygenes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27: 205-233.
26. TANKSLEY, S. D., M. W. GANAL, J. C. PRINCE, M. C. DE VICENTE, M. W. BONIERABALE et al., 1992 High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes: biological inferences and practical applications. Genetics 132: 1141-1160.
27. WADDINGTON, C. H., 1942 Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150: 563-565.
28. XIAO, J., J. LI, L. YUAN and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.