Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2580-2598

  Tao, Yun ^a,b   Hartl, Daniel L ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genomic conflict; Hybrid female sterility; Hybrid lethality; Hybrid male sterility; Meiotic drive; Sex ratio; Speciation

Indexed keywords

SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MAURITIANA; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 0345526405     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01501.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aguadé, M., N. Miyashita, and C. H. Langley. 1992. Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. Genetics 132:755-770.
2. Ashburner, M. 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
3. Bull, J. J. 1983. The evolution of sex-determining mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
4. Caballero, A., P. D. Keightley, and M. Turelli. 1997. Average dominance for polygenes: drawbacks of regression estimates. Genetics 147:1487-1490.
5. Cabot, E. L., A. W. Davis, N. A. Johnson, and C.-I. Wu. 1994. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics 137:175-189.
6. Charlesworth, B., J. A. Coyne, and H. A. Orr. 1993. Meiotic drive and unisexual hybrid sterility: a comment. Genetics 133: 421-424.
7. Civetta, A., and R. S. Singh. 1995. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1085-1095.
8. Clark, A. G., and D. J. Begun. 1998. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149:1487-1493.
9. Clark, A. G., M. Aguade, T. Prout, L. G. Harshman, and C. H. Langley. 1995. Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:189-201.
10. Clark, A. G., D. J. Begun, and T. Prout. 1999. Female X male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283: 217-220.
11. Clark, A. G., E. T. Dermitzakis, and A. Civetta. 2000. Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54: 1030-1035.
12. Coulthart, M. B., and R. S. Singh. 1988. Low genic variation in male-reproductive-tract proteins, between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species, D. simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 182-191.
13. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1993. Further evidence against meiotic-drive models of hybrid sterility. Evolution 47:685-687.
14. Coyne, J. A., B. Charlesworth, and H. A. Orr. 1991. Haldane's rule revisited. Evolution 45:1710-1714.
15. Davis, A. W., and C.-I. Wu. 1996. The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1287-1298.
16. Davis, A. W., E. G. Noonburg, and C.-I. Wu. 1994. Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genetics 137:191-199.
17. Dermitzakis, E. T., J. P. Masly, H. M. Waldrip, and A. G. Clark. 2000. Non-Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males. Genetics 154:687-694.
18. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
19. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection: A Compelete Variovum Edition, 1999. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
20. Frank, S. A. 1991a. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45:262-267.
21. _. 1991b. Haldane's rule: a defense of the meiotic drive theory. Evolution 45:1714-1717.
22. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
23. _. 1956. The estimation of viabilities. J. Genet. 54:294-296.
24. Hamilton, W. D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477-488.
25. Heino, T. I., A. O. Saura, and V. Sorsa. 1994. Maps of the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Dros. Info. Serv. 73:621-738.
26. Hollocher, H., and C-I. Wu. 1996. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulons clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143:1243-1255.
27. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
28. Hughes, K. A. 1995. The evolutionary genetics of male life-history characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 49:521-537.
29. Hurst, L. D., and A. Pomiankowski. 1991. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128: 841-858.
30. Jablonka, E., and M. J. Lamb. 1991. Sex chromosomes and speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 243:203-208.
31. Jaenike, J. 2001. Sex chromosome meiotic drive. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:25-49.
32. Johnson, N. A., and C.-I. Wu. 1992. An empirical test of the meiotic drive models of hybrid sterility: sex-ratio data from hybrids between Drosophila simulons and Drosophila sechellia. Genetics 130:507-511.
33. Lancefield, D. E. 1929. A genetic study of crosses of two races or physiological species of Drosophila obscura. Z. Indukt. Abstam. Vererbung. 52:287-317.
34. Laurie, C. C. 1997. The weaker sex is heterogametic: 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics 147:937-951.
35. Lindsley, D. L., and K. T. Tokuyasu. 1980. Spermatogenesis. Pp. 226-294 in M. Ashburner and T. R. F. Wright, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York.
36. Lindsley, D. L., and G. G. Zimm. 1992. The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
37. Lifschytz, E., and D. L. Lindsley. 1972. The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:182-186.
38. Liu, J. J., J. M. Mercer, L. F. Stam, G. C. Gibson, Z.-B. Zeng, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142:1129-1145.
39. Lyman, R. F., F. Lawrence, S. V. Nuzhdin, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 277-292.
40. Morton, N. E., J. F. Crow, and H. J. Muller. 1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 42:855-863.
41. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
42. Mukai, T., S. I. Chigusa, L. E. Mettler, and J. F. Crow. 1972. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:335-355.
43. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearings of the "Drosophila" work on systematics. Pp. 185-268 in J. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
44. O'Neill, S. L., A. A. Hoffmann, and J. H. Werren, eds. 1997. Influential passengers: microbes and invertebrate reproduction. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
45. Orr, H. A. 1993. Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature 361:532-533.
46. _. 1997. Haldane's rule. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:195-218.
47. Perez, D. E., and C.-I. Wu. 1995. Further characterizations of the Odysseus locus of hybrid sterility in Drosophila: one gene is not enough. Genetics 140:201-206.
48. Perez, D. E., C.-I. Wu, N. A. Johnson, and M.-L. Wu. 1993. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulons clade: DNA marker-assisted mapping and characterization of a hybrid-male sterility gene, Odysseus (Ods). Genetics 134:261-275.
49. Pomiankowski, A., and L. D. Hurst. 1993. Genomic conflicts underlying Haldane's rule. Genetics 133:425-432.
50. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
51. Presgraves, D. C., and H. A. Orr. 1998. Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282:952-954.
52. Price, C. S. C. 1997. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388:663-666.
53. Price, C. S. C., C. H. Kim, J. Posluszny, and J. A. Coyne. 2000. Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:2028-2037.
54. Price, C. S. C., C. H. Kim, C. Groulund, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulons species complex. Evolution 55:81-92.
55. 1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
56. Prowell, D. P. 1998, Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera. Pp. 309-319 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
57. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2002. The evolution of hybrid infertility: perpetual coevolution between gender-specific and sexually antagonistic genes. Genetica 116:179-188.
58. Roff, D. A., and T. A. Mousseau. 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58:103-118.
59. Sandler, L., and E. Novitski. 1957. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat. 41:105-110.
60. Sawamura, K. 1996. Maternal effect as a cause of exceptions for Haldane's rule. Genetics 143:609-611.
61. Silver, L. M. 1993. The peculiar journey of a selfish chromosome: mouse t haplotypes and meiotic drive. Trends Genet. 9:250-254.
62. Simmons, M. J., and J. F. Crow. 1977. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11:49-78.
63. Singh, R. S., and R. J. Kulathinal. 2000. Sex gene pool evolution and speciation: a new paradigm. Genes Genet. Syst. 75:119-130.
64. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
65. Swanson, W. J., Z. Yang, M. F. Wolfner, and C. F. Aquadro. 2001. Positive Darwinian selection drives the evolution of several female reproductive proteins in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2509-2514.
66. Tao, Y., D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2001. Reproductive isolation associated with sex-ratio segregation distortion in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13183-13188.
67. Tao, Y., S. Chen, D. L. Hartl and C. C. Laurie. 2003a. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. I. Differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164:1383-1397.
68. Tao, Y., Z.-B. Zeng, J. Li, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2003b. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. II. Mapping hybrid male sterility loci on the third chromosome. Genetics 164: 1399-1418.
69. Temin, R. G., B. Ganetzky, P. A. Powers, T. W. Lyttle, S. Pimpinelli, P. Mimitri, C.-I. Wu, and Y. Hiraizumi. 1991. Segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic and molecular analysis. Am. Nat. 137:287-331.
70. True, J. R., B. S. Weir, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819-837.
71. Tsaur, S.-C., and C.-I. Wu. 1997. Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:544-549.
72. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.
73. _. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
74. Werren, J. H., and L. W. Beukeboom. 1998. Sex determination, sex ratios, and genetic conflict. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:233-261.
75. Wu, C.-I. 1992. A note on Haldane's rule: hybrid inviability versus hybrid sterility. Evolution 46:1584-1587.
76. Wu, C.-I., and A. W. Davis. 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142:187-212.
77. Wu, C.-I., and H. Hollocher. 1998. Subtle is nature. Pp. 339-351 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
78. Wu, C.-I., N. Johnson, and M. F. Palopoli. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: Why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.
79. Wyckoff, G. J., W. Wang, and C.-I. Wu. 2000. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403: 304-309.