SSIOD: The next generation

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Kury, P ^a   Grabosch, T ^a   Horn Von Hoegen, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENDING (DEFORMATION); DETECTORS; OPTICAL DESIGN; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; STRESS ANALYSIS; ULTRAHIGH VACUUM;

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; LATTICE STRAIN; SURFACE STRESS; THERMAL DEPENDENCE;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 13744255749     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1844191     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. A. Pimpinelli and J. Villain, Physics of Crystal Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
2. J. W. Gibbs, The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs (Longmans-Green, London, 1906).
3. E. Bauer, Z. Kristallogr. 110, 372 (1958).
4. E. Bauer, Appl. Surf. Sci. 11-12, 479 (1982).
5. J. B. Hannon, F.-J. M. zu Heringdorf, J. Tersoff, and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4871 (2001).
6. J. B. Hannon, H. Hibino, N. C. Bartelt, B. S. Schwartzentruber, T. Ogino, and G. L. Kellogg, Nature (London) 405, 552 (2000).
7. J. R. Christman, Fundamentals of Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1988).
8. H. S. P. Wong, B. Doris, E. Gusev, M. Jeong, E. C. Jones, J. Kedzierski, Z. Ren, K. Rim, and H. Shang, International Symposium on VLSI technology, systems and applications, IEEE Proceedings of Technical Papers vii+318, 13 (2003).
9. S. Takagi, T. Mizuno, T. Tezuka, N. Sugiyama, T. Numata, K. Usada, Y. Moriyama, S. Nakaharai, J. Koga, A. Tanabe et al., IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 999, 3.3.1 (2003).
10. P. M. Mooney, S. J. Koester, H. J. Hovel, J. O. Chu, K. K. Chan, J. L. Jordan-Sweet, J. A. Ott, N. Klymco, and D. M. Mocuta, AIP Conf. Proc. 683, 213 (2003).
11. T. Maeda, T. Numata, T. Mizuno, K. Usuda, A. Tanabe, T. Tezuka, S. Nakaharai, J. Koga, T. Irisawa, T. Moriyama et al., IEEE Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures xii +313, 133 (2004).
12. G. G. Stoney, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 82, 172 (1909).
13. K. Kitahara, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 33, 3673 (1994).
14. P. M. Marcus, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7460 (1996).
15. W. A. Brantley, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 534 (1973).
16. P. Kury and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Rev. Sci. Instram. 75, 1357 (2004).
17. H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. Rep. 29, 193 (1997).
18. H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. Rep. 35, 71 (1999).
19. D. Sander, S. Ouazi, A. Enders, T. Gutjahr-Löser, V. S. Stepanyuk, D. I. Bazhanov, and J. Kirschner, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 4165 (2002).
20. D. Sander, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 809 (1999).
21. R. Koch, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 9519 (1994).
22. R. O. E. Vijgen and J. H. Dautzenberg, Thin Solid Films 270, 264 (1995).
23. D. Sander and H. Ibach, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4263 (1991).
24. D. Sander, A. Enders, and J. Kirschner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 4734 (1995).
25. G. Moulard, G. Contoux, G. Motyl, G. Gardet, and M. Courbon, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 736 (1998).
26. A. J. Schell-Sorokin and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1039 (1990).
27. G. J. Leusink, T. G. M. Oosterlaken, G. C. A. M. Janssen, and S. Radelaar, Rev. Sci. Instram. 63, 3143 (1992).
28. W. Brückner and H. Griessmann, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 3662 (1998).
29. R. E. Martinez, W. M. Augustyniak, and J. A. Golovchenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1035 (1990).
30. R. D. Twesten and J. M. Gibson, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17628 (1994).
31. G. F. Cardinale, D. G. Howitt, W. M. Clift, K. F. McCarty, D. L. Medlin, P. B. Mirkarimi, and N. R. Moody, Thin Solid Films 287, 214 (1996).
32. R. E. Mihailovich, T. Koscica, and R. J. Zeto, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2483 (1996).
33. V. Buck, Z. Phys. B 33, 349 (1979).
34. G. Degand, P. Muller, and R. Kern, Surf. Rev. Lett. 4, 1047 (1997).
35. P. Müller and R. Kern, Surf. Sci. 301, 386 (1994).
36. A. J. Schell Sorokin and R. M. Tromp, Surf. Sci. 319, 110 (1994).
37. P. Zahl, P. Kury, and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 69, 481 (1999).
38. Footnote 1: Still, if angular fluctuations of the beam are present, a net effect will occur even at a differential setup.
39. S. Grafström, U. Harbarth, J. Kowalski, R. Neumann, and S. Noehte, Opt. Commun. 65, 121 (1988).
40. C. W. Siders, E. W. Gaul, M. C. Downer, A. Babine, and A. Stepanov, Rev. Sci. Instram. 65, 3140 (1994).
41. R. J. Hill and S. F. Clifford, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 892 (1978).
42. N. Bobroff, Appl. Opt. 26, 2676 (1987).
43. F. E. Ammouri, A. Soufiani, and J. Taine, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 38, 3135 (1995).
44. V. V. Vorob'ev, V. M. Osipov, V. S. Sirazetdinov, A. D. Starikov, T. A. Sheremet'eva, G. N. Filipov, and D. G. Titerton, J. Opt. Technol. 66, 974 (1999).
45. D. G. Waters, Ph.D. thesis, Arizona State University (2000).
46. P. Kury and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 2211 (2004).
47. K. Dahmen, S. Lehwald, and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 446, 161 (1999).
48. K. Dahmen, H. Ibach, and D. Sander, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 231, 74 (2001).
49. S. Nolte, C. Momma, H. Jacobs, A. Tünnermann, B. N. Chichkov, B. Wellegehausen, and H. Welling, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 2716 (1997).
50. C. Momma, B. N. Chichkov, S. Nolte, F. v. Alvensleben, A. Tünnermann, H. Welling, and B. Wellegehausen, Opt. Commun. 129, 134 (1996).
51. C. Momma, S. Nolte, B. N. Chichkov, F. v. Alvensleben, and A. Tünnermann, Appl. Surf. Sci. 109/110, 15 (1997).
52. P. E. Thompson, M. E. Twigg, D. J. Godbey, and K. D. Hobart, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 1077 (1993).
53. W. C. Young and R. G. Budynas, Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002).
54. T. Höpfl, D. Sander, and J. Kirschner, Am. J. Phys. 69, 1113 (2001).
55. L. Bergmann and C. Schäfer, Lehrbuch der Experimentalphysik, Band 1: Mechanik Akustik Wärme, 10th ed. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1990).
56. M. Horn-von Hoegen, B. H. Müller, T. Grabosch, and P. Kury, Phys. Rev. B 70, 235313 (2004).
57. T. Grabosch, Masters thesis, Institute for Laser and Plasma Physics, University of Essen (2001).
58. P. Zahl, M. Bierkandt, S. Schröder, and A. Klust, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 1222 (2003).
59. Footnote 2: "Resolution" in surface stress measurements is usually meant as the noise-equivalent signal, that is a signal with a statistical significance of 1σ. It should be noted that this definition makes il critical lo estimate the sensitivity of a specific experimental setup by the detectable bending radius alone: the mechanical noises are reduced by using a thicker sample and therefore the noise-equivalent signal gets smaller, but in fact the stress detection limit will increase, since it scales with the square of the sample thickness [see Eq. (1)].