Interanimation: Repositioning possibilities in educational contexts

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 534-549

  Mariage, Troy V ^a   Paxton Buursma, Debra J ^a   Bouck, Emily C ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044221724     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370060901     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. Allington, R. L. (1991). The legacy of "slow it down and make it more concrete." In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 19-29). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
2. Artiles, A. J., & Trent, S. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 410-437.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Ball, D. L., & Lampert, M. (1999). Multiples of evidence, time, and perspective: Revising the study of teaching and learning. In E. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman, (Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 371-398). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Banks, J. A., & McGee-Banks, C. (2001). Multi-cultural education. New York: Wiley.
6. Barnes, D. (1992). From communication to curriculum (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
7. Barth, R. S. (2001). The culture builder. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 6-11.
8. Bell, L. A. (1997). Theoretical foundations for social justice in education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook (pp. 3-15). New York: Routledge.
9. Bloome, D. (1986). Building literacy communities. Theory Into Practice, 15, 71-76.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11. Brophy, J. (2002). Discussion. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 333-358). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
12. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice (Vol. 10). New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Burbules, N. C., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Theory and research on teaching as dialogue. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1102-1121). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-522.
16. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Chatterji, M. (2002). Models and methods for examining standards-based reforms and accountability initiatives: Have the tools of inquiry answered pressing questions on improving schools? Review of Educational Research, 72, 345-386.
18. Chouliarki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
19. Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers' instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
20. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. London: Belknap Press.
21. Collins, K. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Council for Exceptional Children. (2001). Performance-based standards. Arlington, VA: Author.
23. Cutter, J., Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. (2002). Supporting inclusion through case-based vignette conversations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 186-200.
24. Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
25. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
26. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., Hock, M. F., Knight, J., et al., (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 96-108.
27. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72, 433-479.
28. De Valenzuela, J. S., Connery, M. C., & Musanti, S. (2000). The theoretical foundations of professional development in special education: Is sociocultural theory enough? Remedial and Special Education, 21, 110-120.
29. Dixon, C., de la Cruz, E., Green, J., Lin, L., & Brandts, L. (1992). Do you see what we see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 29-36.
30. Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly mentally retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 23, 5-21.
31. Eisner, E. (Ed.). (1985). Learning and teaching ways of knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2001. No Child Left Behind. United States Department of Education.
33. Elmore, R. F. (2002). Hard questions about practice. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 22-25.
34. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäkí (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory, (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Englert, C. S., Berry, R., & Dunsmore, K. (2001). A case study of the apprenticeship process: Another perspective on the ap-prentice and the scaffolding metaphor. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 152-171.
36. Englert, C. S., & Dunsmore, K. (2002). A diversity of teaching and learning paths: Teaching writing in situated activity. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 81-130). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
37. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Mariage, T., Rozendal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 253-275.
38. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Mariage, T. V., & Tarrant, T. K. (1998). Accelerating reading progress in early literacy project classrooms: The potential to return students to grade level. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 142-159.
39. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading "POSSE." Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123-138.
40. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. (2003). The sociocultural model in special education interventions: Apprenticing students in higher-order thinking. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 450-467). New York: Guilford Press.
41. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., Fear, K. L., & Gregg, S. L. (1988). A case for writing intervention: Strategies for writing informational text. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 98-113.
42. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Mariage, T. (1994). Developing a school-based discourse for literacy learning: A principled search for understanding. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 2-32.
43. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Mariage, T. (1998), A multi-year literacy intervention: Transformation and personal change in the community of the early literacy project. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 255-277.
44. Englert, C. S., Rozendal, M., & Mariage, M. (1994). Fostering the search for understanding: A teacher's strategies for working in students' "zones of proximal development." Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 187-204.
45. Fairclough, N. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 183-211). New York: Routledge.
46. Finn, C. E., Rotherman, A. J., & Hokanson, C. R. (2001). Rethinking special education for a new century. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.
47. Florio-Ruane, S., & Raphael, T. E. (2001). Reading lives: Creating and sustaining learning about culture and literacy education in teacher study groups. In C. Clark (Ed.), Talking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp. 64-81). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
49. Freire, P. (2002). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
50. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for sustaining research-based practice in the schools: A case study. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(6), 1-14.
51. Fullan, M. G. (1991). Sources of educational change. In M. Fullan & S. Stiegebauer (Eds.), The new meaning of educational change (pp. 325-344). New York: Teachers' College Press.
52. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: Routledge Falmer.
53. Gallimore, R., Goldenberg, C., & Weisner, T. S. (1993). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(4), 537-539.
54. Gee, J. P. (1989a). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171(1), 5-19.
55. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor-Francis.
56. Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 120-130.
57. Gindis, B. (1999a). Introduction of Dr. Gita L. Vygodskaya. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 329.
58. Gindis, B. (1999b). Vygotsky's vision: Reshaping the practice of special education for the 21st century. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 333-340.
59. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
60. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
61. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Heap, J. L. (1991). A situated perspective on what counts as reading. In C. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Toward a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 103-139). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
63. Heras, A. I., Yeager, B., Floriani, A., Dixon, C., Jennings, L., & Green, J. (1992, December). Santa Barbara Discourse Group: Two languages, one community: An examination of educational possibilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
64. Heshusius, L. (1989). The newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403-415.
65. Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1999). The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
66. Koch, K. (2000). Zero tolerance. Congressional Quarterly Researcher, 187-204.
67. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
68. Kozol, J. (1995). Amazing grace: The lives of children and the conscience of a nation. New York: Harper Perennial.
69. Ladner, M., & Hammons, C. (2001). Special but unequal: Race and special education. In C. H. Finn, A. J. Rotherham, & J. C. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.
70. Lagemann, E. C. (1999). An auspicious moment for education research? In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 3-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Lee, C. D. (2000). Signifying in the zone of proximal development. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 191-225). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74. Lemke, J. L. (1998a). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, L. Labbo, M. McKenna & R. Kiefer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Lemke, J. L. (1998b). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
76. Lemke, J. L. (2003, February 28 and March 1). Modeling change: The dynamics of place, time, and identity. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Ethnography in Education Forum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
77. Little, J. W. (1998). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233-262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78. Louis, K., Kruse, S., & Raywid, M. (1996). Putting teachers at the center of reform: Learning schools and professional communities. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 80(580), 9-21.
79. MacArthur, C. (2003). What have we learned about learning disabilities from qualitative research?: A review of studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 450-467). New York: Guilford Press.
80. Mariage, T. V. (2000). Constructing educational possibilities: A sociolinguistic examination of meaning-making in "sharingchair." Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 79-103.
81. Mariage, T. V. (2001). Features of an interactive writing discourse: Conversational involvement, conventional knowledge, and internalization in "morning message." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 172-196.
82. Mariage, T. V., Englert, C. S., & Garmon, M. A. (2000). The teacher as "more knowledgeable other" in assisting literacy learning with special needs students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 299-336.
83. Mariage, T. V., & Garmon, M. A. (2003a). A case of educational change: Improving student achievement through a school/ university partnership. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 215-233.
84. Mariage, T. V., & Garmon, M. A. (2003b). Expanding the potential of school/university collaboration: General and special education as partners in improving student achievement in a rural pds. In D. Wiseman & S. Knight (Eds.), The impact of school-university collaboration on K-12 student outcomes (pp. 49-69).
85. Mariage, T. V., & Patriarca, L. (in press). Improving student outcomes through systemic reforms: Accountability, coherence, individuation, and culture. In Focus on results. Charlotte, MI: Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
86. Mariage, T. V., Patriarca, L., Garmon, M. A., Ziazi, Z., & Cassidy, E. (2003). An educational change heuristic: Participant discussion and critique. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
87. McCarthey, S. J. (1991). Authors, text, and talk: The internalization of dialogue from social interaction in writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
88. McCarthey, S. J. (1992). The influences of classroom discourse on student texts: The case of Ella. In Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
89. McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. London: Routledge.
90. McLaren, P. (1997). Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
91. McNulty, M. (2003). Dyslexia and the life course. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 363-381.
92. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93. Morocco, C. C., Hindin, A., Mata-Aguilar, C., & Mott, E. A. (2002). The role of conversation in a thematic understanding of literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 144-157.
94. National Staff Development Council. (2001). Standards for staff development-Revised. Oxford, OH: Author.
95. Newman, F., & Wehlage, G. (1997). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
96. Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
97. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2003). Teaching to change the world (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
98. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orches-trating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Okolo, C. M., Ferretti, R. P., & MacArthur, C. D. (2002). Westward expansion and the ten-year-old mind: Teaching for historical understanding in a diverse classroom. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 299-331). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
100. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1-2), 73-98.
101. Palincsar, A. S. (1998b). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
102. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
103. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2000, March). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations in science education (CIERA Report No. 2-007). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
104. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., Collins, K. M., & Cutter, J. (2001). Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 15-32.
105. Pardini, P. (2000). Data, well done. Journal of Staff Development, 22(1), 12-18.
106. Patriarca, L., Mariage, T. V., & Garmon, M. A. (2003). Developing schools into learning organizations: Focus on continuous improvement and enhanced student outcomes. Leading Change. Retrieved April 2004. From http://www.cemm.org
107. Patriarca, L., & Ziazi, Z. (2003, April). Sustainability and reculturing: What is sustained and what is sustaining? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
108. Patton, J. M., & Townsend, B. L. (1999). Ethics, power, and privilege: Neglected considerations in the education of African-American learners with special needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 276-286.
109. Paxton-Buursma, D. J. (2004). An apprenticeship in attuned discourse: Opening literacy affordances through multiple semiotics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, in preparation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
110. Peterson, P., McCarthey, S., & Elmore, R. (1996). Learning from school restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 119-153.
111. Popkewitz, T., & Fendler, L. (Eds.). (1999). Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics. New York: Routledge.
112. Poplin, M. S. (1988a). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 403-415.
113. Poplin, M. (1988b). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389-400.
114. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
115. Pugach, M. C., & Johnson, L. J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners, collaborative schools. Denver: Love.
116. Pugach, M. C., & Seidle, B. L. (1998). Responsible linkages between diversity and disability: A challenge for special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 319-333.
117. Rodis, P. (2001). Forging identities, tackling problems, and arguing with culture: Psychotherapy with persons who have learning disabilities. In P. Rodis, A. Garrod, & M. L. Boscardin (Eds.), Learning disabilities and life stories (pp. 205-230). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
118. Rodis, P., Garrod, A., & Boscardin, M. L. (Eds.). (2001). Learning disabilities and life stories. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
119. Roth, K. J. (2002). Talking to understand science. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 197-262). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
120. Roth, W. M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
121. Rueda, R. (1991). Assisted performance in writing instruction with learning disabled students. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 403-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
122. Schmoker, M. (2001). Results: The key to continuous school improvement (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
123. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educa-tional theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
124. Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
125. Siddle-Walker, V. (1998). Their highest potential: An African-American school community in the segregated South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
126. Skiba, R., & Peterson, R. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66, 335-346.
127. Skrtic, T. M. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver: Love.
128. Skrtic, T. M. (Ed.). (1995a). Holism and special education: There is no substitute for real life purposes and processes. New York: Teachers College Press.
129. Skrtic, T. M. (1995b). Special education and student disability as organizational pathologies: Toward a metatheory of school organization and change. In T. M. Skrtic (Ed.), Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for post-modernity (pp. 190-232). New York: Teachers College Press.
130. Sleeter, C. (2000). Epistemological diversity in research on preservice teacher preparation for historically underserved children. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 25, pp. 209-250). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
131. Sparks, D., & Hirsch, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and National Staff Development Council.
132. Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Refraining and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387-431.
133. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
134. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., & Englert, C. S. (1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 277-307). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
135. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A., Fitchett-Bazemore, K., McDaniel, L., & Coleman-Sorrell, A. (2002). Addressing theory, ethics, power, and privilege in inclusion research and practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 11-22.
136. Vygodskaya, G. L. (1999). Vygotsky and problems of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 330-332.
137. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
138. Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a "language-based theory of learning." Linguistics and Education, 6, 41-90.
139. Wells, G. (1999a). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
140. Wells, G. (1999b). Language and education: Reconceptualizing education as dialogue. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 135-155.
141. Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinksy (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51-85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
142. Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building, In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (Vol. 9, pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
143. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
144. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
145. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.