Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 15-32

  Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan ^a   Magnusson, Shirley J ^b   Collins, Kathleen M ^b   Cutter, Jane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035580848     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511293     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (1995). Case studies of full inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 109-180.
2. Blumenfeld, P. C., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students' involvement and use of learning strategies in science. Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 235-250.
3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Carlisle, J. F., & Chang, V. (1996). Evaluation of academic capabilities in science by students with and without learning disabilities and their teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 18-34.
6. Collins, K.M. (1999). "Do you think I'm proper?" A case study of the making of educational exclusion, ability, achievement, and identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
7. Cutter, J., Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (work in progress). Reconstructing group work as an intervention to support the learning of identified students in challenging science instruction.
8. Dalton, B., Morocco, C., Tivnan, T., & Mead, P. (1997). Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(6), 670-684.
9. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. Englert, C., Tarrant, K., & Rozendal, M. (1993). Educational innovations: Achieving curricular change through collaboration. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(4), 441-473.
11. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65(1), 23-35.
12. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
14. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). Learning environments as a site of science education reform: An illustration using interdisciplinary guided inquiry. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 43-50.
16. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science tor students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62(4), 377-411.
17. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 249-261.
18. Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research in case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Miller, M. (1999). The opportunities and challenges of guided inquiry science experiences for students with special needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
20. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown., N. (1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5-19.
22. Palincsar, A. S., Collins, K., Marano, N., & Magnusson, S. J. (2000). Investigating the engagement and learning of students with learning disabilities in guided inquiry science teaching. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 31, 240-251.
23. Polkinghorne, D. (1997). Reporting qualitative research as practice. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text (pp. 135-153). Albany: State University of New York Press.
24. Rogoff, B. (1997). Cognition as a collaborative process. In Cognitive, language, and perceptual development (R. S. Siegler & D. Kuhn, eds.), Vol. 2, Handbook of Child Psychology (W. Damon, ed.). New York: Wiley.
25. Schwab, J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In S. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6-30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
26. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. M. (1994). The construction of scientific knowledge by students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 307-321.
27. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 157-201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25, 233-269.
30. White, B., & Frederiksen, C. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
31. Woodward, J., & Noell, J. (1991). Science instruction at the secondary level: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(5), 277-284.