A case study of the apprenticeship process: Another perspective on the apprentice and the scaffolding metaphor

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 152-171

  Englert, Carol Sue ^a   Berry, Ruth ^b   Dunsmore, KaiLonnie ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c 334 Erikson Hall ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; COOPERATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HANDWRITING; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; LITERATURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; READING; WRITING;

CHILD; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HANDWRITING; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; METAPHOR; PEER GROUP; READING; RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; WRITING;

EID: 0039561307     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221940103400205     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Barnes, D. (1993). Supporting exploratory talk for learning. In K. M. Pierce & C. J. Gilles (Eds.), Cycles of meaning: Exploring the potential of talk in learning communities (pp. 17-34). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Baynham, M. (1995). Literacy practices: Investigating literacy in social contexts. New York: Longman.
4. Biemiller, A., & Meichenbaum, D. (1998). The consequences of negative scaffolding for students who learn slowly - A commentary on C. Addison Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 365-369.
5. Butler, D. L. (1998). In search of the architect of learning: A commentary on scaffolding as a metaphor for instructional interactions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 374-385.
6. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The power of literacy and the literacy of power. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 63-89). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8. Durrell, D., & Catterson, J. (1980). Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
9. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp.19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Englert, C. S. (1992). Writing instruction from a sociocultural perspective: The holistic, dialogic, and social enterprise of writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 153-172.
11. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Mariage, T. V., Rozendal, M. S., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1996). The Early Literacy Project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Remedial and Special Education,
12. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1996). A sociocultural perspective: Teaching ways-of-thinking and ways-of-talking in a literacy community. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 157-167.
13. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research in education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed.) New York: Macmillan.
14. Erickson, F., & Schultz, L. (1977). When is a context? Some issues of theory and method on the analysis of social competence. Quarterly Newsletter for Comparative Human Development, 1(1), 5-10.
15. Evertson, C., & Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), The third handbook for research on teaching (pp. 162-213). New York: Macmillan.
16. Forman, E. A., & McCormick, D. E. (1995). Discourse analysis: A sociocultural perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 150-158.
17. Forman, E. A., & McPhail, J. (1993). Vygotskyian perspective on children's collaborative problem-solving activities. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 213-229). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
19. Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169. Itasca: F.E. Peacock.
20. Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. LeCompte & J. Goests (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 228-291). New York: Academic Press.
21. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1979). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
22. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
23. Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21, 303-407.
24. Hedegaard, M. (1996). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 171-195) New York: Routledge.
25. Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom learning. In D. Hicks (Eds.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 104-141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse and social practice. New York: Peter Lang.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lemke, J. L. (1987, April). Talking science: Content, conflict and semantics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
29. Martin, J. R. (1993). A contextual theory of language. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 116-136). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
30. Martin, J. R., & Rothery, J. Grammar: Making meaning in writing. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 137-153). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
31. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 324-348.
32. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Minick, N. (1996). The development of Vygotsky's thought: An introduction to Thinking and Speech. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 28-53). New York: Routledge.
35. Morgan, W. (1997) Critical literacy in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
36. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318-335.
37. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh - A response to C. Addison Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 370-373.
38. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. L. (1994). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
39. Putney, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & Durn, R. (in press). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry: Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Reid, D. K. (1998). Scaffolding: A broader view. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 386-396.
41. Reid, D. K., Robinson, S. J., & Bunsen, T. D. (1995). Empiricism and beyond: Expanding the boundaries of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 131-141.
42. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
43. Rogoff, B. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child Development, 65, 45-65.
44. Rogoff, B., Malkin, C., & Gilbride, K. (1984). Interaction with babies as guidance in development. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children's learning in the zone of proximal development (pp. 31-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Rose, M. (1999). "Our hands will know": The development of tactile diagnostic skill - teaching, learning, and situated cognition in a physical therapy program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30, 133-160.
46. Roth, W. M. (1998). Designing communities. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
47. Roth, W., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
48. Rueda, R., Gallego, M. A., & Moll, L. C. (2000). The least restrictive environment: A place or a context? Remedial and Special Education, 21, 70-78.
49. Schaffer, H. R. (1996). Joint involvement episodes as context for development. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 251-280). New York: Routledge.
50. Skrtic, T. M., Sailor, W., & Gee, K. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion: Democratic themes in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142-157.
51. Slosson, R. L. (1963). Slosson oral reading test. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
52. Stone, C. A. (1998). Moving validated instructional practices into the classroom: Learning from examples about the rough road to success. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 121-125.
53. Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 410-441.
54. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1996). L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 53-74). New York: Routledge.
57. Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300-322.
58. Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R., Perry, N., & Sawatsky, K. (1986). The efficacy of a self-questioning summarization strategy for use by underachievers and learning disabled adolescents in social studies. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2(1), 20-36.