A class of transpose Jacobian-based NPID regulators for robot manipulators with an uncertain kinematics

Journal of Robotic Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 527-539

  Huang, C Q ^a   Wang, X G ^a   Wang, Z G ^a  

^a MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; END EFFECTORS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; INVERSE KINEMATICS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; POSITION CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); THREE TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CARTESIAN DYNAMICS; INVERSE JACOBIAN; JACOBIAN MATRIX ERROR;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 0036875815     PISSN: 07412223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rob.10058     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R. Kelly and A. Coello, Analysis and experimentation of transpose Jacobian-based Cartesian regulators, Robotica 17 (1999), 303-312.
2. Z. Doulgeri and S. Arimoto, A force commanded impedance control for a robot finger with uncertain kinematics, Int J Robot Res 18 (1999), 1013-1029.
3. C.C. Cheah, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Feedback control for robotic manipulator with uncertain kinematics and dynamics, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Belgium 1998, 3607-3612.
4. C.C. Cheah, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Feedback control of robotic manipulators with an uncertain Jacobian matrix, J Rob Syst 16 (1999a), 119-134.
5. C.C. Cheah, S. Kawamura, S. Arimoto, and K. Lee, PID control of robotic manipulator with uncertain Jacobian matrix, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Michigan, 1999(b), pp. 494-499.
6. F. Miyazaki and Y. Masutani, Robustness of sensory feedback control based on imperfect Jacobian, Robotic Research: The 5th International Symposium, H. Miura and S. Arimoto (Editors), Cambridge, MIT Press, MA, 1990, pp. 201-208.
7. S. Arimoto, Control theory of nonlinear mechanical systems-A passivity-based and circuit-theoretic approach, Clarendon, Oxford, U.K., 1996.
8. B. Armstrong, D. Neveel, and T. Kusik, New results in NPID control: tracking, integral control, friction compensation and experimental results, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Michigan, 1999, pp. 837-842.
9. B. Armstrong and A. Wade B., Nonlinear PID control with partial state knowledge: damping without derivatives, Int J Robot Res 19 (2000), 715-731.
10. S. Arimoto and F. Miyazaki, Stability and robustness of PID feedback control for robot manipulators of sensory capability, M. Brady and R.P. Paul (Editors), Robotics Research: First International Symposium, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1984, pp. 783-799.
11. J.T. Wen and S. Murphy, PID control for robot manipulator, Technical Report 54, CIRSSE, 1990.
12. Z. Qu and J. Dorsey, Robust tracking control of robots by linear feedback law, IEEE Trans Automat Control 36 (1991), 1081-1084.
13. S. Arimoto, Fundamental problems of robot control, Part I, Innovations in the realm of robot servo-loops, Robotica 13 (1995), 19-27.
14. V. Santibanez and R. Kelly, Global convergence of the adaptive PD controller with computed feedback for robot manipulators, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Belgium, 1999, pp. 1831-1836.
15. V. Santibanez and R. Kelly, A class of nonlinear PID global regulators for robot manipulators, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robotics and Automation, Belgium, 1998, pp. 3601-3606.
16. de Wit C. Canudas, B. Siciliano, and G. Bastin (Editors), Theory of robot control, 2nd, Springer-Verlag, London, 1997, pp. 61-63.
17. P. Tomei, Adaptive PD controller for robot manipulators, IEEE Trans Robotics and Automation 7 (1991), 565-570.