QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: A few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 53, Issue 377, 2002, Pages 2089-2098

  Causse, M ^a   Saliba Colombani, V ^a   Lecomte, L ^a   Duffe P ^a   Rousselle, P ^a   Buret, M ^b  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b UMR A 408 INRA University of Avignon   (France)

Author keywords

Aroma; Lycopersicon esculentum; Organoleptic quality; QTL; Sensory analysis; Texture

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; GENES; PH EFFECTS; PLANTS (BOTANY); SUGARS;

TITRATABLE ACIDITY;

FRUITS;

CITRUS; CITRUS LIMON; EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME;

EID: 0036793625     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erf058     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, Moshonas MG. 1991. Quantitative analysis of flavour and other volatiles and for certain constituents of two tomato cultivars during ripening. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 116, 265-269.
2. Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Einstein MA, Malundo TMM, Cart BT, Shewfelt RL, Tandon KS. 1998. Relationship between sensory and instrumental analysis for tomato flavour. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 123, 906-915.
3. Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB. 1997. QTL cartographer. A reference manual and tutorial for QTL mapping. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
4. Bernacchi D, Beck-Bunn T, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley S. 1998. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97, 381-397.
5. Bertin N, Guichard S, Leonardi C, Longenesse JJ, Langlois D, Navez B. 2000. Seasonal evolution of the quality of fresh greenhouse tomatoes under Mediterranean conditions, affected by air vapour pressure deficit and plant fruit load. Annals of Botany 85, 741-750.
6. Causse M, Saliba-Colombani V, Buret M, Lesschaeve I, Schlich P, Issanchou S. 2001. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 2. Mapping QTLs for sensory attributes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 273-283.
7. Chen FQ, Foolad MR, Hyman J, St Clair DA, Beeleman RB. 1999. Mapping QTLs for lycopene and other fruit traits in a Lycopersicon esculentumxL, pimpinellifolium cross and comparison of QTLs across tomato species. Molecular Breeding 5, 283-299.
8. Davies JN, Hobson GE. 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit-the influence of environment, nutrition and genotype. Critical Review of Food Science and Nutrition 15, 205-280.
9. Decoene C. 1995. Tomates, qu'en pensent les consommateurs? Infos-Ctifl 112, 8-11.
10. Eshed Y, Zamir D. 1996. Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Genetics 143, 1807-1817.
11. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289, 85-88.
12. Fulton TM, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD. 1997. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95, 881-894.
13. Goldman IL, Paran I, Zamir D. 1995. Quantitative locus analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a Lycopersicon esculentumxLycopersicon cheesmanii cross. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90, 925-932.
14. Harker FR, Redgwell RJ, Hallett IC, Murray SH. 1997. Texture of fresh fruit. Horticultural Reviews 20, 121-224.
15. Hobson GE, Bedford L. 1989. The composition of cherry tomatoes and its relation to consumer acceptability. Journal of Horticultural Science 64, 321-329.
16. Hobson GE, Gough C, Townley C. 1990. Measuring consumer reaction to the flavour of fresh tomatoes. Acta Horticulturae 259, 107-116.
17. Janse J, Schols M. 1995. Une préférence pour un goût sucrés et non farineux. Groenten+Fruit 26, 16-17.
18. Kader AA, Morris LL, Stevens MA, Albright-Holton MA. 1978. Composition and flavour quality of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by some postharvest handling procedures. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 103, 6-13.
19. Kader AA, Stevens MA, Albright-Holton M, Morris LL, Algazi M. 1977. Effect of fruit ripeness when picked on flavour and composition in fresh market tomatoes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 102, 724-731.
20. Korol A, Ronin Y, Itzcovich A, Peng J, Nevo E. 2001. Enhanced efficiency of QTL mapping analysis based on multivariate complexes of quantitative traits. Genetics 157, 1789-1803.
21. Krumbein A, Auerswald H. 1998. Characterization of aroma volatiles in tomatoes by sensory analyses. Nahrung 42, 395-399.
22. Langlois D, Etievant PX, Pierron P, Jorrot A. 1996. Sensory and instrumental characterisation of commercial tomato varieties. Zeitsch Lebens Unters Forsch 203, 534-540.
23. Malundo TMM, Shewfelt RL, Scott JW. 1995. Flavour quality of fresh market tomato. Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biology and Technology 6, 103-110.
24. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD. 1988. Resolution of quantitative traits into mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335, 721-726.
25. Petersen KK, Willumsen J, Kaack K. 1998. Composition and taste of tomatoes as affected by increased salinity and different salinity sources. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73, 205-215.
26. Petro-Turza M. 1987. Flavour of tomato and tomato products. Food Review International 2, 309-351.
27. Pflieger S, Lefebvre V, Causse M. 2001. The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review. Molecular Breeding 7, 275-291.
28. Ratanachinakorn B, Klieber A, Simons DH. 1997. Effect of short-term controlled atmospheres and maturity on ripening and eating quality of tomatoes. Postharvest Biology and Technology 11, 149-154.
29. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Gervais L, Philouze J. 2000. Efficiency of AFLP, RAPD and RFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome. Genome 43, 29-40.
30. Saliba-Colombani V, Causse M, Langlois D, Philouze J, Buret M. 2001. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 1. Mapping QTLs for physical and chemical traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 259-272.
31. Stern DJ, Buttery RG, Teranishi R, Louisa L. 1994. Effect of storage and ripening on fresh tomato quality. Part I. Food Chemistry 49, 225-231.
32. Stevens MA. 1979. Tomato quality: Potential for developing cultivars with improved flavour. Acta Horticulturae 93, 317-329.
33. Stevens MA. 1986, Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breeding Reviews 4, 273-311.
34. Stevens MA, Kader AA, Albright-Halton M, Algazi M. 1977. Genotypic variation for flavour and composition in fresh market tomatoes. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 102, 680-689.
35. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, et al. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132, 1141-1160.
36. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T. 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92, 213-224.