A molecular phylogenetic study of the palmae (Arecaceae) based on atpB, rbcL, and 18S nrDNA sequences

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 92-112

  Hahn, William J ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RBCL PROTEIN, PLASTID; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE;

ARECACEAE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ARECACEAE; DNA, PLANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ARECACEAE; ARECOIDEAE; BORASSEAE; CARYOTEAE; CEROXYLOIDEAE; CORYPHOIDEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; NYPA; THRINACINAE;

EID: 0036005518     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351502753475899     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Asmussen, C. B., W. J. Baker, and J. Dransfield. 2000. Phylogeny of the palm family (Arecaceae) based on rps16 intron and trnL-trnF plastid DNA sequences. Pages 525-535 in Systematics and evolution of monocots (K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison, eds.). CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia.
2. Asmussen, C. B., and M. L. Chase. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palms. Am. J. Bot. 88:1103-1117.
3. Baker, W. J., C. B. Asmussen, S. C. Barrow, J. Dransfield, and T. A. Hedderson. 1999. A phylogenetic study of the palm family (Palmae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences from the trnL-trnF region. Plant Syst. Evol. 219:111-126.
4. Baker, W. J., J. Dransfield, and T. A. Hedderson. 2000. Phylogeny, character evolution, and a new classification of the Calamoid palms. Syst. Bot. 25:297-322.
5. Ballard, J. W. O., M. K. Thayer, A. F. Newton, Jr., and E. R. Grismer. 1998. Data sets, partitions, and characters: Philosophies and procedures for analyzing multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47:367-396.
6. Bremer, B., R. K. Jansen, B. Oxelman, M. Backlund, H. Lantz, and K.-J. Kim. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny-Case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48:413-435.
7. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
8. Bult, C., M. Källersjö, and Y. Suh. 1992. Amplification and sequencing of 16/18S rDNA from gel-purified total plant DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 10:273-284.
9. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, P. J. Rudall, M. F. Fay, W. J. Hahn, S. Sullivan, J. Joseph, T. J. Givnish, K. J. Sytsma, and J. C. Pires. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: An assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. Pages 3-26 in Systematics and evolution of monocots (K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison, eds.). CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia.
10. Cooper, A., and R. A. Fortey. 1998. Evolutionary explosions and the phylogenetic fuse. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:151-156.
11. De Quieroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
12. Donoghue, M. J., and M. J. Sanderson. 1992. The suitability of molectdar and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pages 340-368 in Molecular systematics of plants (P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York.
13. Dransfield, J., I. K. Ferguson, and N. W. Uhl. 1990. The Coryphoid palms: Patterns of variation and evolution. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 77:802-815.
14. Dransfield, J., and N. W. Uhl. 1986. An outline of a classification of the palms. Principes 30:3-11.
15. Dransfield, J., and N. W. Uhl. 1998. Palmae. Pages 306-389 in Families and genera of vascular plants: Vol. 4. Flowering plants. Monocotyledons (K. Kubitzki, ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. Eyre-Walker, A., and B. S. Gaut. 1997. Correlated rates of synonymous site evolution across plant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:455-460.
17. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410
19. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogeny: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
21. Frati, F., C. Simon, J. Sullivan, and D. L. Swofford. 1997. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in Collembola. J. Mol. Evol. 44:145-158.
22. Gaut, B. S., B. R. Morton, B. C. McCaig, and M. T. Clegg. 1996. Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: Synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10274-10279.
23. Gaut, B. S., S. V. Muse, W. D. Clark, and M. T. Clegg. 1992. Relative rates of nucleotide substitution at the rbcL locus in monocotyledonous plants. J. Mol. Evol. 35:292-303.
24. Goldman, N. J. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
25. Goldman, N. J., J. P. Anderson, And A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
26. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47:9-17.
27. Gu, X., Y.-X. Fu, and W.-H. Li. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:546-557.
28. Hahn, W. J. 1999. Molecular systematic studies of the Palmae. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 83:47-60.
29. Hahn, W. J., and K. J. Sytsma. 2000. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Southeast Asian genus Caryota (Palmae) Syst. Bot. 24:558-580.
30. Halanych, K. M. 1998. Lagomorphs misplaced by more characters and fewer taxa. Syst. Biol. 47:138-146.
31. Harley, M. M., and W. J. Baker. 2001. Pollen aperture morphology in Arecaceae: Application within phylogenetic analyses and a summary of the fossil record for palm-like pollen. Grana 40:45-77.
32. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
33. Hendy, M. D., and D. Penny. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:297-309.
34. Hershkovitz, M., W. J. Hahn, and E. A. Zimmer. 1999. Ribosomal DNA evolution and plant systematics. Pages 268-326 in Advances in plant molecular systematics (P. Hollingworth, R. Bateman, and R. Gornall, eds.). Taylor and Francis, London.
35. Hillis, D. M., and M. T. Dixon. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:411-453.
36. Hoot, S. B., A. Culham, and P. R. Crane. 1995. The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:194-207.
37. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
38. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46: 69-74.
39. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
40. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and D. M. Hillis. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
41. Jukes, T. H., and C. H. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-123 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. M. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
42. Kim, J. 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45:363-374.
43. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
44. Kishino, H., T. Miyata, and M. Hasegawa. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30:151-160.
45. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
46. Kusukawa, N., R. Uemori, K. Asaca, and I. Kato. 1990. Rapid and reliable protocol for direct sequencing of material amplified by the polymerase chain reaction. BioTechniques 9:66-72.
47. Lanave, C., G. Preparata, C. Saccone, and G. Serio. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:86-93.
48. Lewis, C., and J. J. Doyle. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene malate synthase in the Palm family (Arecaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:409-420.
49. Maddison, W. P., M. J. Donoghue, and D. R. Maddison. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33:83-103.
50. Mallatt, J., and J. Sullivan. 1998. 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1706-1718.
51. Moore, H. E., Jr. 1960. A new subfamily of palms-The Caryotoideae. Principes 4:102-117.
52. Moore, H. E., Jr. 1973. The major groups of palms and their distribution. Gentes Herb. 11:27-141.
53. Naylor, G. J. P., and W. M. Brown. 1998. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:61-76.
54. Olmstead, R. G., H. J. Michaels, K. M. Scott, and J. D. Palmer. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:249-265.
55. Poe, S. 1998. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling. Syst. Biol. 47:18-31.
56. Poe, S., and D. L. Swofford. 1999. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 398:299-300.
57. Sanderson, M. J. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: A critique. Syst. Biol. 44:299-320.
58. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-1795.
59. Shimodaira, H., and H. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
60. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. J. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, K. C. Nixon, and J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133:381-461.
61. Steele, M. A., D. Huson, and P. J. Lockhart. 2000. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 49:225-232.
62. Stevenson, D. W., and Loconte, H. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. Pages 543-578 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution (P. J. Rudall, P. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.
63. Stiller, J. W., and B. D. Hall. 1999. Long-branch attraction and the rDNA model of early eukaryotic evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1270-1279.
64. Sullivan, J., J. A. Markert, and C. W. Kirkpatrick. 1997. Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. Syst. Biol. 46:426-440.
65. Sullivan, J., and D. L. Swofford. 1997. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mammal. Evol. 4:77-86.
66. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
67. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
68. Taylor, B., and A. Powell. 1982. Isolation of plant DNA and RNA. Focus 4:4-6.
69. Uhl, N. W., and J. Dransfield. 1987. Genera Palmarum: A classification of palms based on the work of Harold E. Moore, Jr. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
70. Uhl, N. W., and J. Dransfield. 1999. Genera Palmarum after ten years. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 83:245-253.
71. Uhl, N. W., J. Dransfield, J. I. Davis, M. A. Luckow, K. S. Hansen, and J. J. Doyle. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among palms: Cladistic analyses of morphological and chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Pages 623-661 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution (P. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.
72. Whelan, S., and N. Goldman. 1999. Distributions of statistics used for the comparison of models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1292-1299.
73. Wilson, M. A., B. Gaut, and M. T. Clegg. 1990. Chloroplast DNA evolves slowly in the palm family (Arecaceae). Mol. Bol. Evol. 7:303-314.
74. Yang, Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
75. Yang, Z. 1994b. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:294-307.
76. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 13:555-556.
77. Yang, Z., N. Goldman, and A. Friday. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximimum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.
78. Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50:408-424.
79. Zurawski, G., B. Perrot, W. Bottonley, and P. R. Whitfeld. 1981. The structure of the gene for the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase from spinach chloroplast DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:3251-3270.